https://t.me/SharqYulduziJurnali
❤1👎1

Channel
@sharq_yulduzi_jurnali
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
212subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531588903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharq_yulduzi_jurnali |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 4 July 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharq_yulduzi_jurnali |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 212 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 213 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 215 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 219 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 220 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 225 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 226 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 59.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 21.3% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 8.51% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2022 to 26 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/SharqYulduziJurnali
❤1👎1
Бугун Мусо Тошмуҳаммад ўғли Ойбек таваллуд топган кун * * * Хастамен… Фикрга, туйғуга тўлиб — Ой менга ҳамқадам — сокин юрамен. Соғайсам бир куни ёзамен тўйиб, Ҳисларга қалбимни қўшиб ёзамен. ...Кечалар юрурмен телбадай ҳориб – Бошимда ой борур — менга ҳамқадам. Хаёллар учади машъалдай ёниб, Тўйиб ёзажакман бир кун соғайсам...” ОЙБЕК, 1959, 15-август.
👍8❤4😢2❤🔥1👎1🥰1
Buni albatta o‘qing SUKUT SADOSI “Kitobga bejiz “Sukut sadosi” deb nom berilmagan. Bu ikki so‘zda Ikrom Otamurodning ichki olami, tabiati mujassam. Bu sukutni his qilmoq, tinglash, anglash kabi ruhning katta ehtiyoji mavjud. Bu sukut o‘sha hadsiz olamning bepoyon kangul diyorining ramzidir. Unga yetishmoq yo‘lida biz uchun qalb tarjimon va shu qalbgina bizga borlig‘ini namoyon etayotgan sohir ko‘ngil uchun chin …
👍6❤3
https://t.me/mushtumjurnali Сиз таниган, суйган КУЛДИРАДИГАН ВА КУЙДИРАДИГАН “Муштум” журнали яқиндан буён ўз расмий телеграм каналини юргиза бошлади. Каналда: ИЧАКУЗАР ҲАНГОМАЛАР, ҚИЗИҚАРЛИ КАРИКАТУРАЛАР, ҲАЖВИЯЛАР, РИВОЯТЛАР, ҲИКОЯТЛАР, ТАНҚИДИЙ ВА ТАҲЛИЛИЙ ФЕЛЬЕТОНЛАР Бериб борилаяпти. ОБУНА БЎЛИБ, АФСУСЛАНМАЙСИЗ! Каналга обуна бўлинг👇👇👇 https://t.me/mushtumjurnali
👍4
ИШ БОР Адабий танқидчилик деган жониворнинг юзига ёстиқ босиб ўлдиришган. Овози ҳам чиқмади бечоранинг. Бу жиноятни танқид қилишга эса кўпларнинг юраги бетламади. Бироз ўтиб, унинг қабри бошида узундан-узоқ нутқ ўқилди. Духовой оркестр музика чалиб турди... Сўнг “ими-жими”да тарқа-тарқа бўлди. Кейинчалик, маза-матрасиз нарсаларни ўқиб, ўзимизча дўқ урдик. “Қани, адабий танқидчилик? Қарамайдими адабиётга? Ҳамма ёқни…
👍2
Янги очилган «ШАРҚ ЮЛДУЗИ» каналимизга марҳамат! 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/SharqYulduziJurnali
👍3
Ассалому алайкум! Адабиёт ва санъат шундай бир мўъжизаки, унинг энг яхши намуналарини ҳаммага бирдек манзур қилиб бўлмайди. Баъзан шундай бўладики, фалсафий теран, юксак бадиий дид билан ёзилган асарлардан кўра, ҳаёт икир-чикирларини ифодалаган асарларнинг харидорлари ва унинг гулдурос қарсаклар билан қарши олувчилари кўпроқ бўлади. Албатта, қочди-қувди ҳақидаги асарлар енгил ўқилади. Лекин, афсуски, унинг салмоғи …
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02hv2Eh4VgXF6PnYquoQM3WXS8rcm6NHaQnG6JYevxo1QHGyAMAuDVwAaYewjxVdN5l&id=100034721984724
Замонавий қирғиз адабиётининг истеъдодли вакилларидан бири Бейшенбай Усубалиевнинг "Минг" сарлавҳали ҳикоясини ўзгача иштиёқ билан таржима қилгандим. Ҳикоя қаҳрамонлари содда ва самимийлиги билан ўқувчининг эътиборига сазовор бўлади. Нуфузли ва нуфусли "Шарқ юлдузи" журналининг 2022 йил 6-сонида чоп этилган ҳикоя учун журнал бош муҳаррири ва таҳририят аъзоларига миннатдорлик билдирамиз. Адабий алоқаларимиз янада муст…
👍2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sharq_yulduzi_jurnali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Шарқ юлдузи" журнали” (@sharq_yulduzi_jurnali), 212 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharq_yulduzi_jurnali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.