Join our other channel where we post these daily: https://t.me/+O8pIFotsR-45ZGY0

Channel
SHARP SENSE | Sports Systems
@sharpsensesports
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,018subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002111855620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharpsensesports |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharpsensesports |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 1,018 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 1,023 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 1,028 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 1,035 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 1,040 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 1,042 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 1,049 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 1,055 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 1,057 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 1,062 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 1,062 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 44.3% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 31.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 4.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2024 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
2/2 today ✅✅
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Yesterdays Free odds drop alerts were on point 👌🏼✅ Join our other Free private channel where these are posted daily: https://t.me/+O8pIFotsR-45ZGY0 Follow our educational content and explanations to understand how our systems work 📚
❤2👏2🔥2
Join our other channel where we will be posting free insights, plays and educational content. Track our journey in there ⬇️ https://t.me/+O8pIFotsR-45ZGY0
VALUE BETTING MADE EASY! 🎯 It’s time you’re told the truth! You won’t get “Rich” from by following bets ❌ but you can make a good side income using proven strategies like ours. We are launching the Odds Drop Alert Channel 🤖 Far more powerful than a tipping service, this strategy is where serious bettors are quietly profiting. 🧠 Here’s how it works: Sharp bookmakers like Pinnacle (known as the most accurate bookie…
Our ROI with the Free Plays this year sits at 18.8%! 🔥🔥🔥 I don’t joke when I say it’s one of the best, if not the best on this platform. Take a look at what google says a pro’s ROI should be 😉 Crazy to be doing this from the free ones alone. I know I’ve made a lot of you some good money. Let’s keep it going! 💰
🔥2😁2
SHARP SENSE | Sports Systems pinned a photo
Join our other private channel where our daily free plays are posted ‼️⤵️ https://t.me/+rByIz7LRtWwzYzA8
👍7❤2🔥2
Just updated the spreadsheet… Our ROI for the Free Plays alone is 12.30% 📈🔥 This is way above average, Google states, a professional makes a 3-6% ROI so for us to be doing this just from the plays we give for free is very good. Even though some losses here and there, on the long term good profit can be made. Many channels give out plays but are they actually profitable and worth following? 🤷🏼♂️
❤3👍2😁2
Once again, the free play wins. Make sure to join our other private channel guys where they are posted 👆🏼✅
Remember to join our other private channel where our free plays will be posted ‼️⤵️ https://t.me/+rByIz7LRtWwzYzA8
❤6🎉3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sharpsensesports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bestchamp_free · 107,685
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SHARP SENSE | Sports Systems” (@sharpsensesports), 1,018 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharpsensesports.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.