Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

خدمات‌مشاوره‌اطلاعاتی

@shariflibresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003945713196
TypeChannel
Username@shariflibresearch
Descriptionکتابخانه مرکزی، مرکز اسناد و گنجینه دانشگاه صنعتی شریف- خدمات مشاوره اطلاعاتی: همیار پژوهشگران- رسالت اصلی ما توانمندسازی کاربران از طریق ارائه آموزش‌های نوآورانه و مشاوره در اطلاع‌یابی و مهارتهای پژوهشی است. تسهیلگر دکتر مریم اسدی lib_research@sharif.ir
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shariflibresearch

Growth

1338 Aug 2026, 09:05 — 133 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:30 — 133 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:059 Aug 2026, 00:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:30133no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:05133first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.2%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,159
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Videos
1
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1157.9%
🙏526.3%
👍315.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✳️ #اینفوگراف #چگونه_پژوهش_خود_را_به‌صورت_علمی_معرفی_کنیم؟ #روش_پژوهش #روش_تحقیق #پژوهش #آموزش #اینفوگراف #بیان_مساله 🆔@shariflibresearch

2

8 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

*✳️ #چگونه_پژوهش_خود_را_به‌صورت_علمی_معرفی_کنیم؟ یکی از بهترین راه‌ها برای معرفی یک #پژوهش، استفاده از #مثلث_پژوهش است. این مثلث بر سه عنصر اساسی استوار است: #موضوع، #مسئله و #روش. اگر بتوانید ارتباط منطقی میان این سه عنصر را به‌خوبی توضیح دهید، مخاطب به‌راحتی درک خواهد کرد که پژوهش شما چرا انجام شده، چه هدفی را دنبال می‌کند و چگونه به نتایج معتبر دست خواهد یافت. ✔️برای معرفی پژوهش، می‌توانید از دو سناریوی زیر اس

2

5 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✍️ معرفی #هیومنایزر: #دستیار_هوشمند و ابزاری برای طبیعی‌تر کردن متون فارسی اگر از ChatGPT یا سایر #ابزارهای_هوش_مصنوعی برای نوشتن متن استفاده می‌کنید، احتمالاً گاهی احساس کرده‌اید که خروجی‌ها هنوز کمی لحن ماشینی دارند. #هیومنایزر می‌تواند برای حل همین مسئله استفاده شود. این ابزار، متن‌های تولیدشده توسط هوش مصنوعی را بدون تغییر در مفهوم اصلی، به متنی روان، طبیعی و متناسب با شیوه نگارش فارسی تبدیل می‌کند. هدف آن فق

1

4 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC105 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💥#انتخاب_مجله #انتخاب_نشریه_مناسب #مجلات_ISI #JCR سه فایل بالا #فهرست_مجلات یک درصد و ۱۰ درصد برتر JCR و مجلات Nature Index👆👆 تهیه از سوی روابط عمومی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف 🆔 @shariflibresearch

1

3 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

برای سهولت به استناد فرسته‌های بالا👆 #اینفوگراف #بخش_روش‌شناسی ترسیم شده است. #روش‌شناسی #نوشتن_روش‌شناسی #مقاله‌نویسی #نگارش_علمی #اینفوگراف 🆔 @shariflibresearch

🙏21

3 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💥#چگونه_بخش_روش‌شناسی_مقاله_پژوهشی_را_بنویسیم؟ ⭕2. چرا #بخش_روش‌شناسی اهمیت دارد؟ #روش‌شناسی یکی از مهم‌ترین بخش‌های مقاله است؛ زیرا: ✔️اعتبار و باورپذیری یافته‌های پژوهش به کیفیت روش پژوهش بستگی دارد. ✔️نحوه تحلیل و تفسیر نتایج تحت تأثیر روش انتخاب‌شده است. ✔️امکان تکرارپذیری پژوهش را برای سایر پژوهشگران فراهم می‌کند. ✔️داوران و خوانندگان با مطالعه این بخش درباره اعتبار علمی پژوهش قضاوت می‌کنند. ⭕3. بخش #روش‌شناس

1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💥#چگونه_بخش_روش‌شناسی_مقاله_پژوهشی_را_بنویسیم؟ ⭕۱. #روش و #روش‌شناسی چه تفاوتی دارند؟ ✔️روش (Method) روش به فرایند یا مجموعه گام‌هایی گفته می‌شود که پژوهشگر برای دستیابی به هدف پژوهش، گردآوری داده‌ها، تحلیل آن‌ها و پاسخ به سؤال پژوهش طی می‌کند. ✔️روش‌شناسی (Methodology) روش‌شناسی چارچوب فکری و منطقی پژوهش است و مجموعه‌ای از رویکردها، اصول، فنون، شیوه‌ها و ابزارهایی را در بر می‌گیرد که پژوهشگر برای پاسخ به سؤال پژوه

👍21

3 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✳️در ادامه مجموعه آموزش‌های #تکنیک‌های_مقاله‌نویسی، این بار به یکی از مهم‌ترین بخش‌های هر مقاله پژوهشی، یعنی #روش‌شناسی (Methodology / Research Method) می‌پردازیم. ✔️اگر همراه این مجموعه بوده‌اید، پیش از این درباره #انتخاب_موضوع پژوهش، نگارش #عنوان_مقاله و #نوشتن_مقدمه صحبت کرده‌ایم. ✔️اکنون نوبت آن است که در چند فرسته (پست) ببینیم چگونه بخش روش‌شناسی را به‌گونه‌ای بنویسیم که هم برای داوران قابل اعتماد باشد و هم ا

1🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🔰 *پژوهش بین‌المللی نشان داد؛ پروژه سرن ۳ میلیارد یورو سود خالص اقتصادی ایجاد کرده است* 🔻سازمان سرن، بزرگ‌ترین مرکز پژوهش‌های فیزیک ذرات جهان با عضویت ۲۵ کشور از جمله ایران و همکاری حدود ۱۵ هزار پژوهشگر، استاد و متخصص از بیش از ۸۰ کشور، به مطالعه ساختار بنیادین جهان و قوانین حاکم بر آن می‌پردازد و در ادبیات علم، یکی از شاخص‌ترین نمونه‌های «علم بزرگ» (Big Science) محسوب می‌شود. 🔸یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که بخ

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shariflibresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 966,649 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خدمات‌مشاوره‌اطلاعاتی” (@shariflibresearch), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shariflibresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.