Channel
@shariaissuperior
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,077subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001580523482 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shariaissuperior |
| Created | 22 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shariaissuperior |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 3,077 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 3,082 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:10 | 3,086 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 3,086 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
509 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 154 | 30.3% | |
| ❤ | 113 | 22.2% | |
| 💯 | 113 | 22.2% | |
| 💔 | 80 | 15.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 3.34% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 2.75% | |
| 💊 | 10 | 1.96% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 1.18% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.393% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2025 to 18 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Jews who promoted him couldn't spare a penny to give him a proper burial. Nor the right-wingers who claimed he was a "hero of free speech". May Allah increase his torment.
🔥89❤18🎉13🆒2💔1
أجبار في الجاهلية خوار في الإسلام؟! Abu Bakr رضي الله عنه told those who advised him to be lenient with the apostates during the apostasy wars: "Are you tyrants in jahiliyyah and cowards in Islam?!" Such is the case of many such as this charlatan "Shaykh" Uthman and many others such as the african american madkhali community. They flaunt, are proud of, and brag about how tough they are due to their crimes in Jahili…
💯22❤4💊3💔2
This is one particularly for you men under 20: Don't make the mistake of listening to old ignorant people who tell you to keep waiting to get married. These are corrupt people that either think it is normal to enter your 30s a virgin or they find it more acceptable for a young man to commit zina for years on end and then marry some young naive girl after they've ruined themselves, rather than doing things the halal w…
❤27🔥3
Have you ever questioned why it is that it was never typical for 'lawyers' to be discussed in the context of the sharia? It is true that some matters in the sharia could be complex to people, and perhaps it would be useful for someone to appoint a knowledgeable person to put their case forth to a qadhi. This however, has never been typical, while in western legal systems it is in fact the norm to the point that negle…
💯10❤2
There is an argument that muqalideen use, that betrays their mental colonization. They say "if everyone were to make ijtihad people may come to extreme conclusions", and when you interrogate them about what sorts of conclusions they mean, you see that it simply equates to "views that displease the kuffar". How does the muqalid, as someone who claims to have no understanding of the sharia, feel nonetheless qualified …
💯14💊3❤2💔2
Ibn Ḥazm said, “Some of them said: ‘Invalidating qiyās is the view of (Ibrāhīm) al-Naẓẓām, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Iskāfī, Jaʿfar ibn Ḥarb, Jaʿfar ibn Mubashshir, ʿĪsā al-Murādī, Abū ʿAfār, and some of the Khawārij. Among them are those who permit marriage to a son’s daughter, grandmothers, and the consumption of a pig’s brain.’ We do not deny that Jews say ‘Lā ilāha illa Allāh,’ and we say it too. But as they me…
❤5💔1
It is far too common that people satisfy themselves with complacency, and sugar over it by calling it 'patience'. As usual a praiseworthy attribute is used to hide wickedness. Patience is for bearing the burden you have been ordered with, but haste is what is demanded when it comes to implementing an order and doing good in the world. "it is they who race to do good deeds, always taking the lead." [Qur'an 23:61]
🔥22
There were people who unironically thought voting for Trump would fix Gaza. Where do you even begin with such people?
💔27💯16❤1🏆1
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MGmPpXtk0tg
❤2
Muslims often criticize atheists for believing they can intuit morals and arrive at them through pure rational discourse. However many Muslims themselves are in fact knee-deep in this, and this is why they find themselves confused when they learn about the permissibility of marrying pubescent people or cousins, or a woman who has been divorced 20 times, or slavery, or war, or the huddud, or inheritance etc. Instead o…
🔥31
Just a reminder that it's legal in many western countries to flog someone if you obtain their consent and that a Muslim is obligated by his religion to submit to the huddud. Do with that information what you will
❤🔥13🔥9💔2
One of the reasons I talk about Ibn Hazm (RH) and his companions so much on here nowadays is in the hopes that someone better than me can do what is needed with this knowledge. I am hardly the best person for this job, but these things are so hidden away that perhaps the only thing missing for the Muslims is for the right person to find this. Somebody charismatic, attractive, patient, young, steadfast, modest, intel…
💯13🏆3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shariaissuperior. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sharia Is Superior” (@shariaissuperior), 3,077 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shariaissuperior.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.