Сильно переживала, что буду читать про дачу вдали от дачи, поэтому приехала в Красноярск! Греемся с псицей на солнышке и читаем — погружение тотальное ❤
❤19🔥4

Channel
@shapoval_books
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
323subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002620024991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shapoval_books |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shapoval_books |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 323 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 320 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 319 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 319 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
166 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 95 | 57.2% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 18.1% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 14.5% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 4.82% | |
| custom 5249484362621141855 | 6 | 3.61% | |
| custom 5246893698477739020 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.602% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shapoval_books. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сильно переживала, что буду читать про дачу вдали от дачи, поэтому приехала в Красноярск! Греемся с псицей на солнышке и читаем — погружение тотальное ❤
❤19🔥4
Мои книжные итоги июля Давно не писала и сразу врываюсь с итогами. Букв много 🙂 ❕Татьяна Дыбовская — Проект «Борода» ❕7/10 Люблю разного рода мистификации, в том числе литературные. Писала об этой книге подробно здесь. ❕Леонид Каневский — Совсем другая история ❕7/10 Живая, теплая, домашняя книга. Всю дорогу было ощущение, что я просто сижу за столом с Леонидом Семеновичем, а он травит байки. Рекомендую слушать, …
❤10✍3🔥3
Пища духовная вам на что? Но лично я предпочитаю балансировать, потому что вкусно кушац — это святое (мои подружки щас скажут, что это признак «типичного Тельца»)
😁9❤2custom 52468936984777390202💯1
Вчера целых 4 часа провела на экскурсии в Переделкине: слушала про проектирование поселка, архитектурные особенности дач и, конечно, про жизнь их именитых арендаторов. Самая известная из них — дача Пастернаков — оказалась весьма аскетичной, но все равно впечатляет. Вы представьте: половицы помнят шаги писателя и сегодня скрипят так же, как и под его ногами. За стеклом аккуратно расставлены те же бокалы, звоном котор…
❤20✍5
В запрещенной сети рекомендовала, вам тоже в клювике несу подборку книг на выходные! #чтопочитать
❤12🔥8
Что происходит на этом фото? Принимаются только неправильные ответы
😁15❤5
На словах ты Лев Толстой… Эмиль Золя — на самом деле Лев Толстой? Несу рекомендацию книги о большой литературной мистификации. Я страшно люблю всякие конспирологические теории и мистификации — подумать только, до чего может дойти больная человеческая фантазия. Поэтому мне хватило только загадочного названия «Проект "Борода"», чтобы я тут же начала читать эту книгу. Ну и Багдасарова в качестве рассказчика аудиокниги…
❤15custom 52494843626211418556🔥4
Мои книжные итоги июня Большинство из прочитанного в июне обмануло мои ожидания, и это прекрасно. Ловите кучу букв! ❕Мишель Жан — Кукум ❕5/10 Классный задел! Факт, что это история реального человека, восторгает. Но рассказано сухо, словно это хроника событий. ❕Абрахам Вергезе — Завет воды ❕6/10 Ждала стекла и эмоциональных всплесков, а получила манипуляции и усталость от подробных описаний. Но финал крутой, на т…
❤12🔥11
Какой формат итогов вам ближе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @shapoval_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой формат итогов вам ближе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Почитатели” (@shapoval_books), 323 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shapoval_books.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.