约约约

Channel
上海丝足抓龙筋🐉姗姗🦋
@shanshanZLJ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
398subscribers
+118 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003836890727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shanshanZLJ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shanshanZLJ |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 398 | +20 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 378 | +57 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:14 | 321 | +37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 284 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 280 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
又是幸福的一天❤️
19号回归哦
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
最近在老家休息,开课了会通知哦
Photo, posted without a caption
开课咯开课咯❤️
【验证时间】:2026-08-01 【联系老师】:@shanshan0985 【老师艺名】:珊珊 【验证留名】:STAN 【颜值评分】:9 【人照评分】:9 【身材评分】:9 【科室环境】:9 【服务评分】:10 【态度评分】:10 【出击金额】:1099 【推荐指数】:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 【约课记录】: 【服务过程】第一次体验抓龙筋,看了一圈决定去珊珊老师那里一试究竟。 老师家在大世界附近,一个很老派的高楼建筑。进门后就被老师的颜值击中了,这颜真是长我心坎上了。洗完澡后先是正常的按摩,然后开始正题。犹豫了半天没尝试前列腺保养,于是乎战场主要就集中在xjj上了。抓龙筋真的和打飞机很不一样,明明一开始是不带色色的纯保养,但老师就是可以轻而易举地让我梆硬,过程非常舒服感觉很新奇。当老师开始摩挲龟头的时候,我知道爽的要来了。老师用各种手法和脚法让我一直处于很舒服很刺激,差一点就要射但是不会真的射出来的感觉,爽的时候那感觉比做爱要舒服刺激多了,…
感谢哥哥的真实反馈🌹
上海【喜茶】作业报告 👧艺名: 抓龙筋珊珊(点击查看) 🆔联系: @shanshan0985 ⛳位置: #黄浦 瑞福小区 📒小作文: 第一次体验抓龙筋,看了一圈决定去珊珊老师那里一试究竟。 老师的家在大世界附近,一个很老派的高楼建筑。进门后就被老师的颜值击中了,这颜值深得我心啊。洗完澡后先是正常的按摩,然后开始正题。犹豫了半天没尝试前列腺保养,于是乎战场主要就集中在龙筋上了。抓龙筋真的和打飞机很不一样,明明一开始是不带色色的纯保养,但老师就是可以轻而易举地让你梆硬,过程非常舒服但不是色色的那种,就很新奇。当老师开始摩挲龟头的时候,我知道爽的要来了。老师可以用各种手法(脚法)让你一直处于很舒服很刺激的状态但就是不让你射出来,爽的时候那感觉比做爱要舒服刺激多了,有种龟头要爆炸的感觉。最后老师开始冲刺,我也在老师的引导下交了。 珊珊老师是个很有亲和力的姑娘,聊得很愉快,真的是很新奇的体验,完全不是群友说的“就是打飞机”。如果…
Video, posted without a caption
【验证时间】:2026-07-28 【联系老师】:@shanshan0985 【老师艺名】:珊珊 【验证留名】:** 【颜值评分】:9 【人照评分】:9 【身材评分】:8.5 【科室环境】:9 【服务评分】:10 【态度评分】:10 【出击金额】:10p套餐C工兵 【推荐指数】:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 【约课记录】: 【服务过程】半年前就刷过珊珊老师,这次看到有工兵半价,果断拍下约课复刷。 课室在比较市中心位置的老小区,没有门禁不用登记,走廊有点黑,但隔音很好,由于老师也会住在课室,卫生条件有保障。 进门和老师说了一下之前刷过两次,老师自信表示今天看看她的手法进步,交完水费冲洗出来开始服务。 先是让我趴着按背和按腿,晚上11点的尾课都保持力度到位,不得不佩服老师们的体力。按摩和指划手法很不错,精油推大腿感觉也很好。 接下来是前列腺,这次还是和以往一样,选择了“来都来了”,结果也和以往一样,感受了几分钟,体验很独特,然后我过于紧张导致做不下去…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shanshanZLJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海丝足抓龙筋🐉姗姗🦋” (@shanshanZLJ), 398 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shanshanZLJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.