Channel
@shanghaibaogaobang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,605subscribers
+1,026 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003066539062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shanghaibaogaobang |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shanghaibaogaobang |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 6,605 | -54 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 6,659 | -44 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 6,703 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 6,716 | -35 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 6,751 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 6,778 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 6,797 | -393 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 7,190 | -425 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 7,615 | -35 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 7,650 | +1,038 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 6,612 | -45 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 6,657 | +1,078 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 5,579 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：26.8.17 【老师花名】：饱饱 【老师联系】：@jiadingbb 【人照相似】：人照一致 【皮肤身材】：身材匀称 【胸型罩杯】：B 【老师类型】：服务满钟大满贯，真魅魔附体 【机车行为】：无 【最终评分】：10 【是否推荐】：特推！！！ 【大概过程】： 总结：二刷完美的饱饱ls，依旧天花板，已经期待再次返食~ 看到ls频道发券，一刷以后，念念不忘，看到机会，果断抽奖，运气更好，两张优惠~ gzs位置依旧，这次直接到正确大门，没有冤枉路。顺利上楼，看到ls依旧热情打招呼~ 有了上次经验，也熟了不少，交了水费，自行快速洗浴，留给后面时间~ 回到房间，ls帮忙擦干，换上性感网眼qqny，我趴下，开始背面。依旧是舒缓按摩起手，肩颈，后背，腿部，臀部都来了一遍，非常舒坦~ 紧接指划，直接把我快感拉满，五指连心，原来连的是我的心啊~ 我的小老弟已经在努力顶床了。然后是魅惑舌技，舔遍全身，舔到肩膀…
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：8.17 【老师花名】：饱饱 【老师联系】：@jiadingbb 【人照相似】：人比照片好看 【皮肤身材】：前凸后翘 【胸型罩杯】：B 【老师类型】：御姐，服务系 【机车行为】：无 【最终评分】：9.5 【是否推荐】：特推 【大概过程】：只能说她和妍妍都不会拍照，本人比照片好看太多。小区进出很方便，课室温馨，服务到位，仔细认真。水多易敏感，胸B，滑起来很舒服。深喉无齿感，会喷水，值得复刷。 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
🔥上海老猫出击报名 🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：2026.8.14 【老师花名】：妍妍 【老师联系】：@muamua03 【人照相似】：人比照片好看 人照一致 【皮肤身材】：白又嫩 【胸型罩杯】：c 【老师类型】：服务型 【机车行为】：很好，满意 【最终评分】：10分 【是否推荐】： 推荐 【大概过程】：人美声甜气质佳肤白貌美大长腿，技术好又能提供给你情绪价值n刷，期待下次见面 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
❤1
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：8月12日 【老师花名】：温迪咖啡 【老师联系】：@wendy88997722 【人照相似】：人比照片好看 【皮肤身材】：匀称 【胸型罩杯】：b 【老师类型】：御姐 【机车行为】：无 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：特推 【大概过程】：兄弟们已经多次推荐，终于有空能约上妹妹，早早来到课室，开门妹妹果然跟频道一样，很有生命力。跟妹妹聊聊天，自然的去洗澡，上床。做爱很自然，妹妹很认真的福利，查抽插反应很真实，正面看着视觉冲击感很强，今天鸡儿很敏感，最后实在忍不住了，跟妹妹在舌吻中尽情释放。完事之后跟妹妹有说有笑聊了半天才不舍得离去，赞，值的返吃的好妹妹 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
【验证日期】:8.12 【妹子花名】：欣欣 【老师联系】@coco99787 【最终评分】：9分 【是否推荐】:推荐 【服务过程描述】：台风天无所事事，翻看相册，看到欣欣照片，有点像初恋的感觉，春风若有怜花意，可否许我再少年，青春的感觉真好，只不过最近正好台风大作，为了见他顶着大雨出击。gzs在宝山万达的公寓楼，停车地铁都很方便 ，gzs装修很不错很新 ，设施也不错，一进门看到欣欣老师，真人和照片几乎一模一样，真人更年轻漂亮，气质也很不错，主要看上去年纪不大，再三确认成年了，进门有点紧张，老师看出来了，立马送上喝的，拿拖鞋，帮忙洗澡，期间还不断找话题，缓解我的紧张情绪，非常贴心，洗完澡有点冷，还擦完休息了一会。然后床上躺了一会，欣欣老师非常健谈，聊了一会缓解了紧张情绪，开始服务，欣欣老师服务很好很卖力，特别是大蟒蛇简直了，虽然不是很熟练但是都看得出用心了，口了一会，开始带套，卧槽那种包裹感，如云朵般丝般顺滑，整个逼逼包裹住鸡巴，…
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：8月12日 【老师花名】：温迪咖啡 【老师联系】： @wendy88997722 【人照相似】：人比照片好看 【皮肤身材】：皮肤光滑匀称有马甲线 【胸型罩杯】：b 【老师类型】：御姐 【机车行为】：无 【最终评分】：10 【是否推荐】： 特推 【大概过程】：和老师约好时间留门，一进去，老师带着猫猫的发箍特别热情的招呼我进门，稍作休息后进浴室洗澡，洗澡结束后，趴在床上，老师开始做背面服务。各种舔舐，吸皮，毒龙然后老师换正面，开始乳胶，吸皮，在蛋蛋二弟周边吸來吸去，感觉差不多了，欲火焚身了，赶紧让老师带套子女上位。刚插进去，BB特别火热，刚进去那一瞬间，就像把鸡儿泡进热水里，太热了。老师一边淫叫，一边不断扭动，我的双手不停拍打着老师的大肥臀。过了一会儿，我拉着老师去镜子那里搞，老师穿上高跟鞋，对着镜子，不断呻吟，后入干累了，带着老师回到床上传教士，老师特别喜欢这个姿势，可以插的很深，老师也高潮了…
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：2026/08/10 【老师花名】：浦东乐乐 【老师联系】：@pdlele678 【人照相似】：人比照片好看 【皮肤身材】：瘦，苗条，长腿 【胸型罩杯】：B 【老师类型】：嫩妹 【机车行为】：无 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：特推 【大概过程】：老师身材好 ，人也好看，比照片好看，穿着一身粉色的装扮，看身材颜值还是可以冲的，下面比较紧，一摸就湿哒哒，综合比较起来还算可以，好评 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：8.5 【老师花名】：浦东乐乐 【老师联系】：@pdlele678 【人照相似】：9 【皮肤身材】：身材好 【胸型罩杯】：B奶 【老师类型】：长腿 完美炮架 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：推荐 【大概过程】：进门看见老师光着的大长腿迎接，提前说好了的，这点好评一下。工作室也方便找，根据老师的路线到了工作室。还算非常不错的。本人比照片好看多了，而且老师的声音还特别地温柔。服务非常主动，制服也是多套选择，老师是我喜欢的苗条类型，(没有一点赘肉)。身材很棒 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：81 【老师花名】：浦东乐乐 【老师联系】：@pdlele678 【人照相似】：9 【皮肤身材】：身材好 【胸型罩杯】：B型 【老师类型】：大长腿 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：推荐 【大概过程】：群里看到讨论老师的腿和身材很棒，还是果断出击吧，约上了老师，跟照片一样让人容易硬。皮肤黄色，腿也修长，老师挺热情主动看着老师脱去衣服那刻立刻热血沸腾，小乳头粉色带凹陷进去的，B型大小显得格外扎眼，下面好紧多水，老师高潮夹得紧。 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：7.31 【老师花名】：乐乐 【老师联系】：@pdlele678 【人照相似】：人照一致，人比照片更加好看 【皮肤身材】：皮肤光滑，身材好 【胸型罩杯】：B 【老师类型】：大长腿 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：特推 【大概过程】：优点就是老师的颜值，非常的OK长相五官精致耐看，第一次的服务，除了满意还是满意，老师对于你想的和你索要的她都非常非常的懂的和配合，比较爽的是她的身材，后入式姿势满足，一双大长腿纤细的腰，水汪汪的BB，是一次很好的cj 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：7月29 【老师花名】：浦东乐乐大长腿 【老师联系】：@pdlele678 【人照相似】：人照一致，真人 【皮肤身材】：身材顶 【胸型罩杯】：b 【老师类型】：嫩妹长腿 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：推荐 【大概过程】：一开门看到是老师本人，盘着长发很清纯，笑起来也很好看，人很瘦，有胸，皮肤正常色，太有型了，看到就有点忍不住了，颜值身材这一块找不出什么瑕疵，10分，下面无异味 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
🔥上海老猫出击报名 【验证日期】：7月27 【老师花名】：浦东乐乐大长腿 【老师联系】：@pdlele678 【人照相似】：人照一致，真人 【皮肤身材】：身材没得话说 【胸型罩杯】：b 【老师类型】：嫩妹长腿 【最终评分】：9 【是否推荐】：推荐 【大概过程】：老师的面容，身材都很好，属于耐看的，168cm以上的大长腿观感十足，皮肤滑嫩还算可以。跟老师做爱，视觉冲击力拉满。老师上位动力十足，各种姿势都很配合 👉点我返回到老师资料详情👈 聊天群 老师总榜 友情提示： 👉报告仅供参考 理性出击 👈
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @shanghaibaogaobang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海报告作业处【老猫】” (@shanghaibaogaobang), 6,605 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shanghaibaogaobang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.