6.30空

Channel
梦莹的宝藏基地
@GxGxggsc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
357subscribers
+54 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004420261236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GxGxggsc |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GxGxggsc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 357 | +54 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 303 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 303 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 43.5%
- avg views ÷ 357 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 155
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (12 September 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,173 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
上海【喜茶】作业报告 👧艺名: #莹莹 ⛳位置: #普陀 真光路地铁站 🤖课表: https://t.me/xichalssh/33852 📒小作文: 下午3点约了个p,进门看到老师,长的很不错,说话也很温柔,很热情,做的服务是真的好,目前在个价位里面,除了我做的4t店,(但是比大部分4t店里的技师服务还好)cj这几次暂时真的没有其他的个体比得上了,服务很到位,上位很强,每次每次快出的时候我都得赶紧找机会停下来,总结服务意识很强烈,服务也很到位,可以留着复刷!推荐 💁反馈人: gfcd
9.40空
梦莹的宝藏基地 pinned a photo
🎰 普陀梦莹老师优惠抽奖活动 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-老猫福利榜【上海】 🎫 加入-上海老猫修车闲聊(免费上榜) 🎫 加入-梦莹的宝藏基地 🎁 奖品内容: 单次半价, × 1 💡 活动说明: 💡 活动说明: (1)中奖者7天内使用优惠卷,超时作废 (2)中奖者必须去使用优惠卷并提交老师报告(转赠需要联系老师同意) (3)中奖不去乱占用抽奖名额或是中奖去后不给老师写报告将被移除群聊 (4)开奖后请24小时内联系老师兑奖 @Mengying258 (5)提交评价报告联系老猫:@laomaoguanjia2_bot (6)提交报告会获得相应积分 积分用处可在群聊查看 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年09月20日 17时00分00秒
5.20空
【老师艺名】:梦莹 【老师位置】:#普陀 【老师价格】: 800/p/40min 1500/pp/80min 【老师联系】:@Mengying258 【双向联系】:@Mengying258_bot 【老师频道】:@GxGxggsc 【约课请跟老师说老猫看到的】 【提交报告获取积分兑换奖品】 ------------------------------- 【闲聊群】【报告榜】【提交报告】
4.40有位置
#梦莹 #普陀 老师榜单:https://t.me/shkccj/21987 下午3点约了个p,进门看到老师,长的很不错,说话也很温柔,很热情,做的服务是真的好,目前在个价位里面,除了我做的4t店,(但是比大部分4t店里的技师服务还好)cj这几次暂时真的没有其他的个体比得上了,服务很到位,上位很强,每次每次快出的时候我都得赶紧找机会停下来,总结服务意识很强烈,服务也很到位,可以留着复刷!推荐
起床预约了哥哥们
11点半还有空位,没有人的话,今天就休息啦!
休息下,和朋友出去吃个饭,9.00回来哦
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @GxGxggsc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“梦莹的宝藏基地” (@GxGxggsc), 357 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GxGxggsc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.