6 measurements spanning 23 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 709–802 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 09:47
791
+16
24 Aug 2026, 09:57
775
+47
16 Aug 2026, 16:25
728
+4
8 Aug 2026, 14:57
724
+4
8 Aug 2026, 02:15
720
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:18
720
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
46.5%
avg views ÷ 791 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
18 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,209
Reactions total
130
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
484 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5314383453062464424
107
22.1%
💘
82
16.9%
custom 5314468029558457541
72
14.9%
🍓
48
9.92%
custom 5316591053367706221
41
8.47%
custom 5314789439141085562
29
5.99%
custom 5292159733199840136
24
4.96%
custom 5316886130505842171
23
4.75%
custom 5298958533285421258
17
3.51%
custom 5260272946806532152
14
2.89%
custom 5289836173072573049
14
2.89%
🦄
9
1.86%
custom 5316649537937376083
4
0.826%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 484 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shami_manga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Добро пожаловать на канал
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
Здесь вы найдёте переводы китайских и корейских новелл в жанрах BL и гет.
💋 Гет
1⃣ «Всё, я сдаюсь, больше не играю» (индустрия развлечений)
2⃣ «В погоне за летом»
🔞 BL | Корея
1⃣ «Фаворит императора»
2⃣ «Цвет гортензии»
🔞BL | Тайланд
1⃣ «Двое дерзких "плохих парней" в милом режиме тайно переписываются как подружки в чате»
🔞 BL | Китай
1⃣ «Мятежные ученики»
…
🥹🥹РОЗЫГРЫШ НА🔀🔀🔀
🍬🔀🔀🔀150 ЗВЕЗД🥹🥹
🥹🥹🥹УСЛОВИЯ 🥹🥹🥹
• Написать в комментариях свой порядковый номерок.
• Быть подписанными на канал (скрин подписки кидать в комментарии)
🥹НА ЭТОМ ВСЕ 🥹🩷🥹🥹
Дополнительные номерки можно получить поделившись этим постом с друзьями.
❤️🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
1 Место — 100 ⭐
2 Место — 25 ⭐
3 Место — 25 ⭐
🥹🥹🥹🌿🌿🌿
🥹🤩🥹ИТОГИ 10 АВГУСТА 🥹
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
🥹 🥹🥹Домашняя кошка Нора не любит больших собак🥹🥹
. : ° °.🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
🥹ГЛАВА 6🥹🥹🥹
𐌿ρᥱд⃝⃝⃝ыдущᥲя — Сᴧᴇдую⃝щᴀя
🥹ВСЕ ГЛАВЫ 🥹🍵🍵🍵
Перевод🥹Ичи
Тайп🥹 Ичи
Клин🥹Ичи
— дать на ням-ням 🥹🥹
2202206710918272 (сбер)
🥹🥹🥹🥹💓💓
🥹🥹Неизменный Ю Вон🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🤍🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🩷🔀🔀🔀✴️✴️✴️✴️🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
🥹🥹🥹Описание 🥹🥹🩷
🥹💓🥹Предлагаем вам окунуться в мир депрессии, насилия, издевательств, сумасшествия (все как мы любим). Два героя снова встретились спустя время. Их запутанные отношения зародились еще в школе, и теперь снова начнутся во взрослой жизни.Ю Вон - офисный работник, который терпит издевательства начальника и коллег. До Хун - успешный руководитель, приход…
🥹🥹Твоя собачья любовь🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🤍🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🩷🔀🔀🔀✴️✴️✴️✴️🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
🥹🥹🥹Описание 🥹🥹🩷
🥹💓🥹«Прекрасный президент студсовета и обычный хулиган. Пробирающая до дрожи история встречи двух юношей!» «Просто слушаться чьих-то приказов, получать за это похвалу… Я лишь хочу прожить жизнь, не делая ничего, кроме этого». Неужели это всего лишь грешная сказочная мечта? Именно таким было простое желание Акиры Таманои, самого обычного старшекл…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shami_manga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 327,337 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Şamİ| Вишнёвый краш | Испорченный и жуткий | Монстр и призрак | Контр Краш | неизменный ю вон” (@shami_manga), 791 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shami_manga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
