Channel
@shamelesshonesty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
297subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624592838 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shamelesshonesty |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shamelesshonesty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 297 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 296 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 296 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,748 |
| Reactions total | 190 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
190 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6089234813556890877 | 79 | 41.6% | |
| custom 5217512385551548162 | 50 | 26.3% | |
| custom 5431682969876067744 | 40 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5415607667496336202 | 13 | 6.84% | |
| custom 5330014118952848376 | 7 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5391182136944375215 | 1 | 0.526% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Даже не знаю какой звук приносит удовольствия больше - стон любимого человека или БОЖЕ МОЙ, первое вышедшее из-под твоих пальчиков наконец ПОЛУЧИВШЕЕСЯ БАРРЭ 🥹
custom 521751238555154816212custom 53300141189528483762
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52175123855515481625custom 60892348135568908775
Я наконец смогла подобрать описание чувства, которое вызывает во мне квартира, в которой я нахожусь эту неделю:
custom 54316829698760677447
Сегодня открыла для себя imassage и словила ощущение регистрации ВКонтакте в третьем классе и чат с лучшей подружкой. Вам настоящих валентинок оттуда 😄
custom 52175123855515481626custom 53300141189528483762
Бармен, ты слышал? Пустырника мне и моим парням!
custom 60892348135568908775custom 52175123855515481621
А можно ещё сильнее ветер и ещё красивей закат? 🌟 Фитили на веерах этот чудный морской бриз задул мгновенно! Чашки ещё немножко видно 🌟 Ph.: @binashipitsyna Dnsr: со мной 🌟 Антон Кирюшкин
custom 608923481355689087710custom 52175123855515481622
В Екате мою сумбурность последнего дня поймали чудесные девчонки, очень поднявшие настроение! Ph.: @yalozhka
custom 52175123855515481626custom 60892348135568908772
Сегодня косплею Поистера Классического (стандартно необыкновенного) для вас. Из скина и способностей пока только шапка... 🪄 когда? - 2 августа, сегодня - 21.00 💫 где? - Питер :) - ст.м. Беговая - пляж парка 300-летия наконец-то ногами в песочек
custom 54316829698760677449custom 52175123855515481626custom 60892348135568908774
Video, posted without a caption
custom 60892348135568908774
Ее бы укрыть, ее бы обнять, ее бы раздать Дай бог ее хватит
custom 521751238555154816212custom 54316829698760677447custom 53300141189528483763custom 53911821369443752151
И я локти кусаю, Надо плыть - забываю. Не сугроб, не растаю! Самолёт - полу-желанный, особо без точки назначения, с размытыми целями и прохладной ценой. Город - родной, немного настойчивый, но приятно обнимающий Балтийским бризом, без улиц-сковородок. Стругацких - сказали, интересно и глубоко, по паре страниц в день. Алхимика - вслух по десять глав маме, смотрящей в стену коршуном, сопящей с натугой. Деньги -…
custom 541560766749633620213custom 608923481355689087710custom 54316829698760677446
Мимоходом - ясный Екатеринбург 🤩 Ph.: @Boki_Moon
custom 608923481355689087721custom 54316829698760677449
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @shamelesshonesty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 704,976 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“shameless honesty” (@shamelesshonesty), 297 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shamelesshonesty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.