Немного о сексе после 40💫
custom 54517210882559365855custom 52605672551455392534custom 54158254266332028402

Channel
@shamahanscaya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
682subscribers
+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001496101929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shamahanscaya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shamahanscaya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 682 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 694 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 706 | +81 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 625 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 619 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 620 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 620 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5451721088255936585 | 56 | 37.3% | |
| custom 5415825426633202840 | 35 | 23.3% | |
| custom 5364201435858744869 | 32 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5260567255145539253 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5251251621404368435 | 10 | 6.67% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немного о сексе после 40💫
custom 54517210882559365855custom 52605672551455392534custom 54158254266332028402
"Я больше никогда не пойду на сайты знакомств" 👩 Обычно это говорится после очередного захода, где ты: Три вечера листала анкеты; отвечала на одинаковые "привет, как дела?"; пыталась понять, нормальный он или опять что-то мутное; вытягивала переписку на себе; И потом снесла нафиг приложение с ощущением, что зря потратила время, не так то они в принципе были и нужны, эти отношения🦄🤡 А на самом деле, суть вовсе не …
custom 53642014358587448693custom 54158254266332028402
Когда после выходных сложно прийти в себя😲
custom 54517210882559365855
Мужчина может пригласить тебя на свидание, уже почти решив, что отношений между вами не будет.🐱 Вчера я переслушивала интервью с мужчинами про знакомства. И один из них совершенно спокойно сказал: "Я на 90% понимаю, что ничего не получится. Но мне интересно встретиться и посмотреть, что она за человек". Романтика внезапно покинула чат 😄 Женщина обычно думает: "Раз пригласил, значит, я ему понравилась и он рассмат…
custom 53642014358587448695custom 54158254266332028403
Маршрут перестроен🚀
custom 54158254266332028407custom 54517210882559365851
Уровень самооценки - Маша.🩷 Похоже, у Джуда нет шансов😁
custom 54158254266332028404custom 54517210882559365853custom 52512516214043684352
"Я никогда не выбирала мужчину. Меня выбирали." Кейс после аудита знакомств. Елена два года была свободна, знакомилась на сайтах и ходила на встречи. Но все происходило без системы. Появлялся мужчина, проявлял интерес, звал на свидание - и дальше она решала, нравится он ей или нет. То есть выбор вроде бы был. Но только среди мужчин, которые уже выбрали ее. Точка А: - нет четкого понимания, какого мужчину она ищет…
custom 53642014358587448695
Срочный сбор! Авито запускает знакомства. У кого уже появилось? Я пока у себя в аккаунте не вижу. Интересно, какие параметры будут в объявлении? 😜 Что думаете?)
custom 54158254266332028404custom 52512516214043684352custom 52605672551455392531
Когда на сайтах уже всех посмотрела 😂
custom 54517210882559365856custom 54158254266332028402
Шамаханская pinned a photo
Почему тебе пишут не те мужчины🤔 И дело не в возрасте. Чаще проблема в том, как ты выглядишь в анкете, какое впечатление создаешь и каких мужчин зовешь своей подачей. Я Софья Шамаханская, дейтинг-продюсер и стратег в знакомствах. Дважды выходила замуж с дейтинг приложений и больше 15 лет знаю этот рынок изнутри. Работаю с женщинами после 35, которые сейчас в поиске отношений и хотят получать больше подходящих зн…
custom 53642014358587448698
Когда следуешь трендам и нашла себе парня помоложе 🎯🥂
custom 54517210882559365854custom 52605672551455392532
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shamahanscaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шамаханская” (@shamahanscaya), 682 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shamahanscaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.