Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شاهنامه فردوسی

Channel

شاهنامه فردوسی

@shahnamehbarayehame

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,987subscribers

+56 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001004941596
TypeChannel
Username@shahnamehbarayehame
Created3 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shahnamehbarayehame

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “شاهنامه” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

2,9312,9872,9595 August 2026 — 2,931 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,931 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,935 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,939 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,944 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,945 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,950 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,958 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,965 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,967 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,964 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,965 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,971 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,973 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,987 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,923–2,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:382,987+14
14 Sept 2026, 04:592,973+2
10 Sept 2026, 12:012,971+6
5 Sept 2026, 16:582,965+1
1 Sept 2026, 15:582,964-3
29 Aug 2026, 07:532,967+2
26 Aug 2026, 08:072,965+7
22 Aug 2026, 21:252,958+8
19 Aug 2026, 02:572,950+5
16 Aug 2026, 03:172,945+1
12 Aug 2026, 16:042,944+5
9 Aug 2026, 19:212,939+4
6 Aug 2026, 23:302,935+4
6 Aug 2026, 05:042,931no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:232,931first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

225 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18481.8%
👍2511.1%
🔥156.67%
👏10.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026

که رستم بُدش نام و بیدار بود خردمند و گُرد و جهاندار بود ستاره‌شمُر بود و بسیارهوش به گفتارش موبد نهاده دو گوش برَفت و گرانمایگان را ببرد هر آنکس که بودند بیدار و گرد برین گونه تا ماه بگذشت سی همی رزم جستند در قادسی بسی کشته شد لشکر از هر دو سوی سپه یک ز دیگر نه برگاشت روی بدانست رستم شمار سپهر ستاره‌شمُر بود و با داد و مهر همی‌گفت کاین رزم را روی نیست رهِ آبِ شاهان بدین جوی نیست

7 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjomanshahnamehpajouhiPhoto

پرهیز از فروکاست مفاهیم؛ ضرورتی بنیادین در خوانش شاهنامه در فلسفه علم و هرمنوتیک، فروکاست‌گرایی به معنای توضیح یک پدیده پیچیده تنها بر پایه یک عامل یا یک سطح از معناست. پل ریکور تأکید می‌کند که متن‌های بزرگ ادبی دارای «فزونی معنا» هستند؛ یعنی هرگز نمی‌توان آن‌ها را به یک تفسیر واحد یا ساده فروکاست. همچنین هانس-گئورگ گادامر در حقیقت و روش نشان می‌دهد که فهم هر متن تاریخی، نیازمند توجه به افق تاریخی و زبانی آن است و …

❤3🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC172 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

همی تاز تا آذرآبادگان به جای بزرگان و آزادگان

❤7

6 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC223 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بزرگان که در قادسی بامنند درشتند و بر تازیان دشمنند

👍8🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC230 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

همی نام جاوید باید نه کام بینداز کام و برافراز نام

👍7❤5🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC263 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjomanshahnamehpajouhiPhoto

پرهیز از فروکاست مفاهیم؛ ضرورتی بنیادین در خوانش شاهنامه پرهیز از فروکاست مفاهیم یکی از بنیادی‌ترین اصول روش‌شناسی در شاهنامه‌پژوهی و به‌طور کلی در مطالعه متون کلاسیک است. بسیاری از سوءبرداشت‌های رایج درباره شاهنامه از آنجا ناشی می‌شود که مفاهیمی چندلایه و تاریخی، به یک معنای امروزی یا تک‌بعدی فروکاسته می‌شوند. شاهنامه، اثری است که در طول بیش از هزار سال، همواره موضوع تفسیرها و برداشت‌های گوناگون بوده است. یکی از…

❤10

5 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC264 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چو بر خسروی گاه بنشست شاد کلاه بزرگی به سر برنهاد چنین گفت کز دور چرخ روان منم پاک فرزند نوشین روان پدر بر پدر پادشاهی مراست خور و خوشه و برج ماهی مراست بزرگی دهم هر که کهتر بود نیازارم آن راکه مهتر بود

❤8🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC291 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هش و دانش و رای دستور ماست زمین گنج و اندیشه گنجور ماست

❤9🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC306 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چنین داد پاسخ که جنگی سوار نباید که سیر آید از کارزار

❤11🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC304 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چنین داد پاسخ که اندر جهان به ما شاد بادا کهان و مهان

❤11🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC302 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

جهاندار چون گشت یزدان‌پرست نیازد به‌بد در جهان نیز دست

❤9🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC296 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ز گفتار ویران نگردد جهان بگو آنچ رایت بود در نهان

❤9🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @shahnamehbarayehame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شاهنامه فردوسی” (@shahnamehbarayehame), 2,987 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shahnamehbarayehame.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.