Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 186–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:01
199
-4
10 Sept 2026, 19:15
203
+3
2 Sept 2026, 00:43
200
+5
26 Aug 2026, 19:43
195
+2
13 Aug 2026, 14:38
193
+5
8 Aug 2026, 12:04
188
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:22
188
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
144 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
101
70.1%
❤
27
18.8%
👍
9
6.25%
😁
4
2.78%
🥰
2
1.39%
👎
1
0.694%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shaha_digital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Metaga lead haqida qanday ma'lumot bersak to'g'ri bo'ladi?
Lead sifatini oshirish uchun metaga CAPI bo'yicha ma'lumot yuborish kerak. Buning uchun qadamlar ketma-ketligi mavjud!
1. Lead formani meta + google sheets bilan ulang
2. Lead Status qismiga ushbu ma'lumotlardan birini kiriting:
created — lead forma to'ldirdi (hozirgi holatingiz)
contacted — operator bog'landi
qualified — haqiqiy qiziqish bor, mos mijoz
co…
2 haftadan keyin deyarli tayyor boʻladi!
Targetologlar oramizda boʻlsa savollarga toʻgri va aniq javob berishingizni soʻrab qolardim
https://forms.gle/V66cJksKHoo4GgTaA
Ushbu linkda savollar bor shuni faqat toʻgʻri toʻldirib berishingizni iltimos qilib qolaman!
Targetologlar uchun juda kerakli start-up!
1 oydan beri shu bilan ovoraman. Eng ogʻriqli nuqtaga yechim berilgan
Tez orada tayyor boʻladi!
Nima deb oʻylaysiz?
A/B test - hamma ham bu nima beradi? degan savolni berishadi!
Menda yangi loyiha uchun testga auditoriyalar tayyorladim va yangi loyiha bo'lgani uchun o'rtacha natija narxi qanaqa ekanini bilmadim.
A/B testga reklama yoqdim.
Endi menda raqam bor va o'rtacha natijadan kelib chiqib loyiham uchun prognoz bera olaman
Siz ham ishlating!
O'zbekiston 5:0 hisobida Portugaliyadan yengildi!
Bu post futbol haqida emas. Muvaffaqqiyatli karyera qurish uchun muvaffaqqiyatsizlikdan xulosa qilinadi. Xatolar to'g'irlanib keyin g'alabaga erishiladi.
Har bir sohada success loyihalar qilish uchun avval fail loyihalar qilinadi.
O'zim suhbatlashgan 80% targetologlarning birinchi loyihasi fail bo'lgan. Shaxsan o'zimda ham. Bu qo'rqinchlimi, albatta yo'q. Unda nima…
Auditoriyalar tutashuvi odatda 10% dan kam qilish kerak. Qanchalik kamaytirsangiz budjetdan shunchalik effektiv foydalanayabsiz degani.
Auditoriya tutushuvini kamaytirish budjetdan maksimal effektiv foydalanishga, metrikalarni yaxshiroq va aniqroq ishlatishga, yaxshiroq natija olishga yordam beradi!
Target faqat "BROAD" auditoriya sozlash emas!
Bu holatda reklama yoqsam bo'ladimi? Men yoqqan bo'lardimmi?
Auditoriyalar tutashuvi nima va u targetda qanday ahamiyati bor? Budjetni qanchalik samarali ishlatishda yordam beradi!
Auditoriyaning tutashuv foizi qanchalik baland bo'lsa siz budjetni shunchalik bekorga sarflayabsiz degani, ya'ni xar xil auditoriya yaratdingiz lekin ularning o'xshashligini tekshirmas ekans…
Targeting sohasiga qiziqqan asistent izlayabman
Targeting bo'yicha fundamental bilimlarga ega asistent kerak
Onlayn aloqada bo'lishi va men bilan birga loyihalarda ishlaydi
Maosh berilmaydi. Targetingni real loyihalarda ishlatib kuchaytirmoqchi bo'lganlar uchun
Batafsil: @shahadigital
Birovning haqqi haqida!
Bu postda ozgina bo'lib o'tgan voqealar haqida yozaman.
Oramizda marketing sohasida ishlaganlarning 80% qismida bo'lgan bo'lsa kerak.
Kelishuv qilinadi, ish qilinadi lekin pul yo'q. Biznes egasi yoki hamkor pulga uxlatadi.
Menda juda ko'p bo'lgan va taxminan 4000$ dan oshiq pulga "uxlaganman"
Harakat qilaman doim shartnoma va kelishuvni oldindan olishga, lekin kelishuv asosida natija qili…
Kelishilgandek challenj uchun reaksiya yigʻib beribsizlar!
Vada qilingandek boshlaymiz!
Hozir sizlarga soʻrovnoma tashlayman va aynan shu sorovnoma uchun challenj davom etamiz!
❤3
Signed Shahzodbek Aktamov
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shaha_digital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shaha | Digital Marketing | Blog” (@shaha_digital), 199 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaha_digital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.