Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Шафир

@shafirtv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,065subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609009699
TypeChannel
Username@shafirtv
Created9 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shafirtv

Growth

2,0652,0702,067.55 August 2026 — 2,070 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,070 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,065 subscribers5 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,064–2,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:312,065-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:502,067-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:192,070no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:002,070first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 2,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (20 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,595
Reactions total358
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 26s
Average length
4m 26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

345 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯13037.7%
👍6318.3%
😁3811.0%
❤‍🔥3510.1%
👏3510.1%
🔥174.93%
🤯154.35%
😢61.74%
51.45%
👀10.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC144 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Фром зе боттом оф май харт эбаут зе ситуэйшн эраунд Ормуз анд Ю Эс - Иран пис дил

❤‍🔥6👏4🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC198 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Многие задаются вопросом: почему всякий раз, когда человечество, казалось бы, выходит на новый уровень развития, обязательно происходит нечто, что трудно объяснить одной только логикой истории? Войны, катастрофы, распады государств, новые глобальные противостояния. Распад СССР. Война США с Ираном. Нынешняя полугорячая, полухолодная война России с Европой. Есть одно необычное объяснение: всё это нужно для того, чтобы

💯13❤‍🔥4👏4🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC209 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VersiaRuPhoto

Пиратский регламент Евросоюз «разрешил» продавать российскую нефть, которую страны ЕС изъяли или конфисковали, не возвращая владельцам ни груз, ни деньги. Брюссель называет это новым санкционным механизмом, но, по сути, если убрать юридические обороты, получится куда проще: чужую нефть можно забрать, продать, а выручку оставить себе. То есть получится банальное воровство. Полная версия статьи по ссылке: https://vers

💯13🔥2❤‍🔥1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC287 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Человеками...

🤯13😢51❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC253 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lomovkaaPhoto

«Украинцам продают не членство в ЕС, а процесс ожидания членства». Секретарь Союза журналистов России, политолог Тимур Шафир в общении с «Ломовкой» прокомментировал заявление СВР РФ, что европейские лидеры категорически отрицают возможность перспективы вступления Украины в ЕС. История с европейским будущим Украины – это сказка про белого бычка. Публично Киеву годами говорят: «Ну, конечно, вы часть Европы, двери отк

👍8🔥3💯2❤‍🔥1👏1

2 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC761 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❓почему захват мигрантами Сеуты - лишь репетиция ❓пора ли переименовывать Европу в Северный Магриб? ❓что ждёт шенгенскую зону дальше? ❗️об этом, и о многом другом - в утреннем эфире с Иваном Каменевым по ссылке https://max.ru/channel_shafir/AZ_Ch-SmLrQ

👍11👏3❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC340 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Так бывает, когда твои пиарщики - дегенераты.

💯24❤‍🔥2🔥1😢1

31 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,050 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

То, что сегодня происходит в Сеуте - не просто миграционный кризис на далёкой испано-марокканской границе. Это репетиция будущего Европы. За сутки в город с населением около 84 тысяч человек вломилось около 60 тысяч минрантов , то есть почти 70% от населения. Это уже не несколько лодок, фургонов иди самолетов с нелегалами, а человеческий поток, который фактически снёс государственную границу. Погибших уже тоже хвата

💯263👏3❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC419 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lomovkaaPhoto

«Это была продажа ожидания защиты». Накануне Зеленский* провел в США переговоры с Трампом. По их итогам стало известно, что Уиткофф и Кушнер впервые посетят Украину в рамках усилий по возобновлению посреднических переговоров с Россией. Кроме того, киевский главарь снова просил ракеты для ПВО, а Трамп якобы подтвердил намерение передать лицензию на производство Patriot. Секретарь Союза журналистов России, политолог

💯11👍3❤‍🔥1👏1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC367 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Политические институты ЕС рассматривают все страны континента как своих союзников в противостоянии с Россией. https://t.me/rtarabicnewsroom/108845

❤‍🔥4💯4👍2🔥1🤯1

28 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC369 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

P.S. Кстати, всем пузырям пузырь надулся и лопнул же в феврале 2021 года. Если кто помнит - он назывался Clubhouse. Знаю людей, которые по нему умудрились даже тренинги провести, нечто в стиле "Clubhouse и будущее человечества". Куда до него ИИ, доткомам или вебу 2.0...

😁6💯2❤‍🔥1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC389 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всегда с удовольствием встречаю - в том числе в действительно стоящих обзорах - фразы типа "...жду, когда этот ИИ-пузырь лопнет". Ну лопнет, дальше что? ИИ и использование его буквально везде и всеми никуда не денутся. И в чём тогда смысл томительного ожидания? Преклонный возраст позволяет мне припомнить такие "лопнувшие пузыри", как например "крах доткомов" аж в 1995 или каком-то там дремучем году. Или пузырь "веб

👍4👏3😁2❤‍🔥1👀1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @shafirtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 429,433 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шафир” (@shafirtv), 2,065 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shafirtv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.