Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˚ʚ♡ɞ˚ Храм Вiтерка˚ʚ♡ɞ˚||🏳️‍🌈

Channel

˚ʚ♡ɞ˚ Храм Вiтерка˚ʚ♡ɞ˚||🏳️‍🌈

@shadrie_fate3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

196subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001563349267
TypeChannel
Username@shadrie_fate3
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shadrie_fate3

Growth

1969 Aug 2026, 20:16 — 196 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:20 — 196 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:1610 Aug 2026, 04:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 195–197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:20196no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:16196first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 196 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.0
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held10 (9 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total230
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
880.0%
😢220.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC14 viewsread 9 August 2026

Крч, завтра як світло дадуть буду колупатися, тому якийсь готові модельки будуть залити туди. Комішен моделс я не прикриваю. :DD #шадрі_щітпост

9 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hualingcoser

Крч. Я хз як я буду там сидіти. Я зробила нову сторінку. Ту де я сиділа з 18 року, видалила. Це мені далось дуже тяжко, але якщо інстаграм так видаляє мої фото скрізь. В мене не було просто тупо вибору, я тільки що потратила час, що б зберегти памʼятні моменти з тієї сторінки, і видалила її. Тому ось нова. Знову ж таки, я не знаю, як я її буду вести, але за підписку я буду дуже вдячна. Знову все починати з початку

2

9 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hualingcoserPhoto

💙🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩💙 Cantarella Буду вдячна за актив 💙 Мяу💙

2

9 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bomi_mei_cosplayPhoto

🪑🛑🪑🛑🅰️🛑🍉🛑🐴🛑🅰️🛑♋️ Мамине намисто одягну І до неба руки простягну. Мамине намисто, щоб цвіла Доля моя!.. Доля, доля моя!.. 🔣photo by little stupid monster 🔣post in Instagram ☢️ #STALKER 2⃣ #FreeStalker

2

9 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC20 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @evi_tsuPhoto

〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ° . · 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ · . · °〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ . ° ·🥈· ° . __________________________________ 🔵Who would have thought that the paths of a cheerful space explorer and a cold, calculating assassin would ever cross? ° 🐟Juno is still trying to understand Earth’s technology, while · ° 🐟Widowmaker seems to have found herself a new target... ° .

9 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC22 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ryabakitchenPhoto

🌟🌟🍎🌟🌟 ❌❌❌🍎 ❌❌🌟🌟🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🌟🌟 ❌hebi hebi day 2 performance "ʏᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ'ᴛ ᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴡɪɴ ɪꜰ ʏᴏᴜ'ʀᴇ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇᴅᴇꜰᴇɴꜱɪᴠᴇ. ᴛᴏ ᴡɪɴ, ʏᴏᴜ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴀᴛᴛᴀᴄᴋ!' © Light ❌❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 "ᴀɴ ᴇʏᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ᴀɴ ᴇʏᴇ, ᴍʏ ꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅ." ©L fd.: death note char.: Light Yagami & L Lawliet photo 1-3: nastya.sverdlova_ph photo 4: tina__photographer_ 🤩: ряба 🪽: філін 🤩#ряба_на_сцені

9 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😃😃😃😃😃 #шадрі_щітпост

😢2

9 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Спробувати для моделей завести етці, чи нє.. #шадрі_щітпост

2

9 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC28 viewsread 9 August 2026

Закон ніби й нічого такого страшного. У випадку з перуками, то ну ніяк не зробити, щоб в коробці було більше 50% вільного простору навіть без наповнювача, зважаючи, що найбільша частина відправок це коробки по 5кг. В ідеалі просто почати робити коробки з оцими вставками висувними картонками, які фіксують перуку внизу, юзати пупирку по мінімуму в один шар або для елементів які дійсно цього потребують й заповнювати віл

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @shadrie_fate3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 316,152 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˚ʚ♡ɞ˚ Храм Вiтерка˚ʚ♡ɞ˚||🏳️‍🌈” (@shadrie_fate3), 196 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shadrie_fate3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.