4 measurements spanning 34 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 13:36
35
-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:33
36
-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:01
37
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:13
37
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
42.2%
🔥
16
35.6%
👍
3
6.67%
👏
3
6.67%
😍
3
6.67%
🥰
1
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2023 to 16 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔭 ویژه نامه روز نجوم
نشریه علمی ، فرهنگی شباهنگ 🎉🎊
🖇 به مناسبت روز نجوم / ۲۹ اردیبهشت
سال اول / #شماره_سوم / بهار ۱۴۰۳
📡 هوش مصنوعی در اختیار هوافضا
⭐️ استروبیولوژی
✈️ گردشگری فضایی
🪐 تیتان
🎮 معرفی بازی
🎬 معرفی فیلم
📚 معرفی کتاب و ...
📌 طراح و صفحه آرا: میثم صالح زاده
🟠 هیئت تحریریه دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل :
آیناز شیرینی/ مهسا حاجی بابائی / محمدرضا رسولی / عرفان عبادی / آرزو عین اللهی / ثمین رضوانی
🟡 هیئت…
فصلنامه علمی ، فرهنگی شباهنگ
🖇اولین نشریه نجوم دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل
سال اول / #شماره_دوم / زمستان ۱۴۰۲
☠ سرنوشت جسد فضانوردان
🩵 قلب یخی پلوتو
🛰 ماهواره های ایران
📷 فوت و فن عکاسی نجومی
🥁 معرفی موسیقی و ...
📌 صاحب امتیاز و مدیرمسئول: طوبی اصغریان
📌 سردبیر: الهام جهانگیری
📌 طراح و صفحه آرا: میرعلی ساجدی
🔵 هیئت تحریریه دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل :
زهرا آقایی / مبینا طهماسبی زاده / مهسا حاجی بابائی / آیناز شیری…
#حقایق_فضایی
ماه لیمویی شکل ! 🍋
برخلاف شکل ظاهری ماه در آسمان شبانه ما، این ماهواره طبیعی زمین به هیچ وجه کره گرد کاملی نیست.
در واقع کره ماه همچون سایر اجرام کروی منظومه خورشیدی، به شکل یک لیمو با قطبهای تخت و شکم دادگی در اطراف کمربند استوایی آن است.
تصور میشود که این شکل عجیب و غریب کره ماه، در جریان گردش وضعی به گرد خود و فعل و انفعالات مرتبط با همسایه آن یعنی کره زمین، بلافاصله پس از شکلگیری آن ایجاد شده اس…
#رخدادنجومی
اولین بارش شهابی ۲۰۲۴
بارش شهابی ربعی (Quadrantid meteor shower) اولین بارش سال نو میلادی است. ZHR این بارش در زمان اوج یعنی ساعت ۴:۲۳بامداد فردا ۱۴دیماه، حدود ۱۲۰شهاب در ساعت است؛ اما در بارش امسال با وجود نور مزاحم ماه که پس از نیمه شب طلوع میکند، متوقع دیدن شهابهای زیادی نباید بود.
یادآور میگردد که عامل این بارش یک جرم مرموز است و Peter Jenniskens، سیارک2003 EH1 را بعنوان عامل این بارش معرفی کرد. …
◾️ #ما_درون_کیهان_کیهان_درون_ما
زیر آسمان شبی پرستاره...
تماشای رقص سالسای شفقهای قطبی در آغوش فلک
کهکشانِ مادر دستش را به آرامی بر سر آنها کشیده و دامن پر زرق و برقش را میتکاند تا محفل را ستارهباران کند
و در وصف آن سوی فلک نیلگون، میشنوی صدای سکوت را؟
خاموش بمان که زحل، اسطورهی زیبایی و خدای زمان به پهلو خوابیده است تا ژوپیتر را جانشین قدر و عظیم برای سلطنت چندین سالهی خود اعلام کند
و فراتر از قلمروی هلیوس، …
#مرگ_خورشید
وقتی خورشید ما بمیرد، چه اتفاقی برای زمین خواهد افتاد؟
اما آیا خورشید در پایان عمرش برای اخترشناسان احتمالی در سیارههایی که میلیونها سال نوری از ما فاصله دارند، حتی برای مدتی کوتاه قابل مشاهده خواهد بود؟
ستارهشناسان امروزی میگویند مدلهای آنها پیشبینی میکند که خورشید در پایان عمرش یک سحابی سیارهای میشود و کم نور باقی مانده و در نهایت پراکنده و محو میگردد.
البته نام سحابی سیارهای هیچ ربطی به سی…
Signed Elham
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shabahang_mgz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@shabahang_mgz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@itsmongel named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نشریه شباهنگ” (@shabahang_mgz), 35 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shabahang_mgz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.