гетеро обычгая ориентация каждого,я поняла тебя
custom 522681728187448645112❤2
Signed котик мин. 67

Channel
@sh3r0povvv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
144subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002038273325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sh3r0povvv |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sh3r0povvv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 144 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 148 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 149 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 149 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
416 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 169 | 40.6% | |
| custom 5226817281874486451 | 114 | 27.4% | |
| custom 5404397781378952893 | 65 | 15.6% | |
| custom 5316921568280994379 | 16 | 3.85% | |
| 💩 | 12 | 2.88% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5321542368975943632 | 10 | 2.40% | |
| custom 5425054160301094541 | 9 | 2.16% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 0.962% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
гетеро обычгая ориентация каждого,я поняла тебя
custom 522681728187448645112❤2
Signed котик мин. 67
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52268172818744864519❤2custom 54043977813789528932
Signed котик мин. 67
какие они все уроды в игре этой от нетфликса мне страшно на них смотреть
custom 522681728187448645110custom 54043977813789528934❤1😱1
Signed котик мин. 67
@saigonopafu @pokaneebu123 @Kaiiy0_fish on X @sourssg @papxjjj #эдит #ивк
custom 522681728187448645120custom 54043977813789528936❤3🍌2
Signed котик мин. 67
у мкня большинство видео чб потому что я виртовская @bykateaddams @miraclebew @tgaxvgp #ивк #эдит
custom 522681728187448645113❤6🍌1
Signed котик мин. 67
у тангю родилась вторая дочка и она опять похожа на ТАНОСА неужели они и дальше будут армию будущих неудачников рожать...
custom 522681728187448645119❤5
Signed котик мин. 67
я чувствую себя будто изменила мне очееь стыдео перед великими тангю простите меня грешную девицу о великие я прошу вас смиловаться и не обрушать на меня свой гнев
custom 52268172818744864517❤5🤡2
Signed котик мин. 67
мем #эдит #мг
❤12custom 54043977813789528932🍌1🤡1
Signed котик мин. 67
КЛЯНУСЬ это намгю
❤19custom 54250541603010945416custom 53169215682809943793
Signed котик мин. 67
это тангю,если бы танос был репером,а намгю был с ним с самого начала
❤16custom 52268172818744864514
Signed котик мин. 67
@murmurphyyy @saigonopafu @fboobaqkzc on X @Kaiiy0_fish on X @sadhungrytired on X @jumsmurck on X @floppachoppass on Tumblr @siskicroca @pokaneebu123 #эдит #ивк
custom 540439778137895289314custom 52268172818744864514❤1custom 54250541603010945411
Signed котик мин. 67
@papxjjj @fboobaqkzc on X @NeTXxa #ивк #анимация
❤23
Signed котик мин. 67
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sh3r0povvv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sh3r0povvv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“декашк” (@sh3r0povvv), 144 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sh3r0povvv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.