@seyedjavadmiri
👍1

Channel
@seyedjavadmiri
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,107subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001000676684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seyedjavadmiri |
| Created | 8 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seyedjavadmiri |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 4,107 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 4,103 | -8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 4,111 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:46 | 4,105 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 4,109 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 4,116 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 4,124 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 4,129 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 4,130 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 4,133 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 4,121 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 4,129 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 4,132 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:10 | 4,132 | -1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 4,133 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 27 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 137 | 87.3% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 12.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@seyedjavadmiri
👍1
Malcolm X is often written off as a slogan or a threat. Join the first Black studies professor in the UK, Kehinde Andrews, as he restores Malcolm X's radical clarity. Malcolm was not a detour from civil rights, but its sharpest diagnosis. Andrews argues alongside him that racism is structural, global, and enduring, not a moral glitch. Integration without justice was never liberation. Malcolm’s challenge remains un…
👍2
@seyedjavadmiri
👍4
غلامحسین ساعدی نام این اثر را "آشغالدونی" گذاشت نه "آشغال" اما چرا؟ آشغال در ساختار زبانی "اسم" است و به معنای "چیز دور ریختنی" و "بیارزش" است اما در معنای مجازی به "آدم پست و به دردنخور" هم آشغال گفته میشود. اما جالب است ساعدی از مفهوم "آشغالدونی" که فرم محاورهای "آشغالدانی" است را برای توصیف خود استفاده کرده است. آشغالدان چیست؟ آشغالدان جایگاه یا ظرف نگهداری آشغال است. آشفالدان در چارچوب دستور زبان به عنوان "اس…
👍2👎2
"تفسیر تئوریک جنگ رمضان" عنوان جدیدترین اثر سیدجواد میری است که بزودی به انگلیسی به چاپ خواهد رسید. این شاید اولین کتاب در سطح جهانی به زبان انگلیسی درباره جنگ ظالمانه آمریکا علیه مردم ایران باشد. در این کتاب تلاش شده است ریشههای تئوریک دیکتاتوری سیارهای آمریکا مورد بازخوانی و واکاوی قرار بگیرد. سیدجواد میری @seyedjavadmiri
👍15👎2
کتاب "غلامحسین دینانی در بستر فلسفه جهانی" به چاپ رسید. این شاید اولین اثر درباره فلسفه استاد دینانی در سطح جهانی باشد. سیدجواد میری @seyedjavadmiri
👎8👍6
کتاب "بحران هرمنوتیک، تاریخ و تکنولوژی: فلسفه رضا داوری اردکانی" شاید دومین اثر درباره استاد داوری در سطح جهانی باشد که به آراء ایشان پرداخته است. سیدجواد میری @seyedjavadmiri
👍4
ساعدی از طریق این تقابل، یک پرسش بنیادین در تاریخ معاصر تفکر حتی پیش از فوکو در جهانی که ذیل سیطره دیکتاتوری سیارهای کاپیتالیستی قرار گرفته است میپرسد و آن سوال این است که آیا جامعه باید بر اساس منطق پادگان (سرکوب و انضباط نظامی) اداره شود، یا بر اساس منطق درمان-گاه (مراقبت، آسیبشناسی و درمان)؟ این بنیادیترین پرسشی است که سوشیال تئوری انتقادی ساعدی بر آن ابتناء یافته است و تاکنون کمتر از این منظر تئوریک در فضای ج…
👍2
به نظرم این تحلیل میتواند روزنه جدیدی بر روی مطالعات تئوریک درباره آراء و افکار ساعدی به روی ما بگشاید و این تصور که او صرفاً یک نویسنده رمان و فیلمنامهنویس بود را واسازی کند. با این خوانش میتوان گفت ما به نوعی دست بر روی یکی از بنیادیترین، درخشانترین و کمتر دیدهشدهترین ابعاد اندیشهٔ غلامحسین ساعدی گذاشته است. مسئلهٔ «نظم اجتماعی» (Social Order) و دوگانهٔ «نظم پادگانی/فرمانی» در برابر «نظم مراقبتی/درمانی»، نه…
👍2
@seyedjavadmiri
👍11
غلامحسین ساعدی و پرسش از "نظم اجتماعی" آیا ساعدی در باب "طبیعت نظم اجتماعی" اندیشیده بود؟ در رمان "تاتار خندان" اپیزودی وجود دارد که پزشک روستا با خودش در حال گفتگویی درونی است و از خلال این گفتگوی درونی به مسائل پیرامون خود میاندیشد. او میگوید "همه چیز به موقع، سر ساعت معین و با نظم و ترتیب. درمانگاه را [رجب] با پادگان نظامی عوضی گرفته، هیچکس حق ندارد این نظم را بشکند یا مقررات موجود را به هم بریزد، کار را به جا…
👍6
۶. بازیهای نرد و شطرنج: دیالکتیک جبر، اختیار و بازی کیهانی (Lila, Divine Play, Cosmic Game) پیشنهاد اشراقی برای بازی شطرنج و نرد به پزشک، آموزش قوانین روان و جهان هستی است: • شطرنج: مظهر عقلانیت، نقشه، استراتژی و آگاهیِ هشیارانه است. • تختهنرد: مظهر جبر، تاس (تقدیر)، تصادف و تسلیم در برابر بازی روزگار است. • اشراقی با تعلیم این دو بازی، به پزشک یاد میدهد که چگونه میان «عقل و تقدیر» و میان «ارادهٔ ایگو و قوانین…
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @seyedjavadmiri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سیدجواد میری مینق” (@seyedjavadmiri), 4,107 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seyedjavadmiri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.