Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Команда депутата Севостьянова Сергея! За Калининград!

Channel

Команда депутата Севостьянова Сергея! За Калининград!

@sevostyanov39

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

355subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001707149316
TypeChannel
Username@sevostyanov39
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sevostyanov39

Growth

354355354.57 August 2026 — 354 subscribers8 August 2026 — 354 subscribers15 August 2026 — 355 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 354–355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:54355+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:46354no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:15354first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 355 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total269
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 12 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3526.5%
🔥2115.9%
1410.6%
👏86.06%
🤡86.06%
custom 520221595401611868775.30%
🤬75.30%
😱64.55%
😢53.79%
💯43.03%
👌32.27%
💔32.27%
😁32.27%
🤔32.27%
🤝21.52%
10.758%
🤨10.758%
🤮10.758%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC69 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#Хитров #самовыдвиженец #выборы #Калининград Наш товарищ идет самовыдвиженцем! Наш товарищ по Левому фронту Владимир Хитров 5 августа подал все необходимые документы для регистрации в порядке самовыдвижения кандидатом в городской Совет депутатов Калининграда. Так получилось, что для сбора подписей избирателей у нас было 3 дня. Сделано невероятное, и мы собрали 78 подписей избирателей при необходимом минимуме в 76. В

👍74🔥2🤡1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC200 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Товарищи, земляки и новые жители области! Приближаются выборы в Горсовет Калининграда и Законодательное Собрание области. Многие спрашивают, участвую ли я. Ответ - да. После массовых выдавливаний и исключений из КПРФ, в тч меня, где я пробыл 15 лет, я думал, как и ряд наших товарищей, от какой партии можно выдвинуться, так как самовыдвиженцев сейчас практически не регистрируют. Нам с вами (тк депутат наразрывно до

👍13👏7🔥4🤝2🤡21👌1

18 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC185 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ливневые желоба у Северного вокзала

👍6🔥62👌2🤡1

16 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC194 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что не ясного?! Лжекпрф сливает округ. Я уверен, что бесплатно такие дела не делаются. В случае, если настоящий Евгений Ган (на фото) пойдёт от другой партии или самовыдвиженцем, в бюллетене будет ещё один Ган, за которого люди будут голосовать случайно. Голоса расползутся, и у Евгения Гана будет меньше шансов победить. Интервью Евгения Гана Новому Калининграду. Кпрф воздержалась от комментариев. https://t.me/newkal_

🔥5🤔3🤡2🤬21😢1

11 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC297 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что лжекоммунисты сольют Гана, я ванговал ещё года два назад, ибо всё на столько ясно, что дальше некуда. Удивительна наивность такого опытнейшего и возрастного политика, который видел, как "партия" выкинула из себя порядка 50-100 идейных и активных коммунистов, фактически, уничтожила женское движение при кпрф и Комсомол. Напомню, Евгений Ган - знаковый и авторитетнейший политик из сторонников идей социализма. Был Пр

😱6💔3😢3🤡2

10 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC191 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @d_batyrshin

Поговорил в итогах недели о топливном кризисе, ожидании «Карты калининградца» и о скандалах с так называемым благоустройством в Калининграде, связанных с повреждением деревьев на Полоцкой и Северном вокзале и ликвидацией исторической брусчатки на Галицкого: «Все эти случаи объединяет то, что дорожные работы велись одной и той же компанией — «Мосинжиниринг». Это уже не первые претензии к дорожникам, но ситуация повто

💯4👍3

4 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC162 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С 80-тилетием Калининграда! Процветания, социально-экономического развития, комфорта нам и нашему городу! 🎉🎆

4custom 52022159540161186873🔥2👍1

4 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Пассажиро- и грузоперевозки должны функционировать!" - депутат С. Севостьянов. 30 июня направлено в администрацию Калининграда и Правительство области предложение продумать и принять меры, которые в услових дефицита нефтепродуктов, не позволят встать общественному транспорту и грузоперевозкам.

👍4👏1🔥1😁1

3 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC139 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Программа Дня города Калининграда!

custom 520221595401611868741🔥1🤮1

2 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC147 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всё, как я и говорил, ярких и идейных коммунистов в "кпрф" давят, выдавливают и исключают. https://t.me/vizioner_rf/18672 Предвыборная зачистка в КПРФ набирает обороты К не выдвижению Рашкина в одномандатном округе в Иркутской области, несмотря на поддержку иркутского обкома, добавилось и не выдвижение его в местном списке КПРФ. Отозвали с одномандатных округов в Москве Парфенова и Обухова. Если Обухова поставили н

🤬41😁1😢1

1 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC125 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @newkal_streamPhoto

#ЭксклюзивНК ❗️Аминов о грубом отношении к коллегам-депутатам: «Их честь и достоинство я не затронул» Председатель Горсовета Олег Аминов во время заключительного заседания 30 июня несколько раз повышал голос и грубил депутатам-коммунистам, когда те озвучивали свои вопросы по повестке. В частности, ему не понравилось, что коммунисты предложили включить в состав счетной комиссии депутата от своей фракции. «У меня та

🤨1🤬1

27 Jun 2026, 09:10 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

https://rutube.ru/video/372b7de1ffd2807248c4d3df34926e74/?r=a/

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sevostyanov39. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Команда депутата Севостьянова Сергея! За Калининград!” (@sevostyanov39), 355 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sevostyanov39.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.