Channel
@setterbeauty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001938190636 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @setterbeauty |
| Description | Сутулая собака рассказывает о косметике |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/setterbeauty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 104 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 104 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (4 March 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 30 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
68 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 41.2% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 19.1% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 17.6% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Минутка оффтопа про шмот. Знали ли вы о коллаборации Рогова с Zarina? Я нет, пока не наткнулась на маркетплейсе. И понеслась тихая охота. Ностальгическая леопардовая шуба-чебурашка как из детства, шарф-панельки, кричащий прованс на грани домашней одежды с вышивкой крестиком. Я хочу все! Короче, делюсь выловленными шедеврами всратого дизайна из масс-маркета. Отдельный лайк за собачий шмот, жаль, что только для малень…
🥰3
Закончила санскрин от Purito. Продукт рабочий. Без придыханий, но смело можно брать, особенно для сухой кожи. #хорошее
❤4
Прямое включение из постельки. Я болею, да ( Короче, много рекламы у блогеров, много чудесных отзывов о средствах бренда. Отличная упаковка, приятная органолептика и совершенно не работающий продукт, увы. Этот бальзам сушит и возглавляет антирейтинг всех моих бальзамов, оттеночных и ухаживающих. На его фоне оттеночный бальзам Стеллари, который декоративный, это просто вершина ухода за губами в любой сезон. Короче, …
❤4🙏2👍1
Неплохо бы возродить канал. Поэтому под этим постом пусть будет некая рубрика вопрос-ответ. Про банки, ингредиенты, аппараты, чего где добыть и т.д. Я расскажу свое мнение либо накидаю пруфов, если они есть. Может сделаю несколько постов по мотивам. Сейчас у меня куча корейских банок, так что про них мне особенно есть, что сказать.
🔥4❤2
А что вы знаете о счастье?
😁7🔥4❤2
Интересно, есть ли люди, которые боятся ГМО, но используют банки с экзосомами, факторами роста всех мастей, "стволовыми клетками" что на самом деле в лучшем случае кондиционирования среда и PDRN ) Вы там как вообще? Кстати, знали ли вы, что если достаточно хорошо молоть что-то в блендере, получится PDRN? #подумалось
🤣4❤2🤔1
Всем привет! Расскажу про супер отличную банку от VT. Сыворотка с азелаиновой кислотой. Честно признаюсь, это моя первая азелаинка, каким-то образом именно этот актив мне никогда не попадался и сама я не покупала, думая, что не надо. Так вот, надо! Это розовая водичка, очень комфортная, быстро впитывается, но оставляет немного маслянистое ощущение на коже, что легко нивелируется кремом сверху. Сухую кожу не утяжеля…
❤7
А что выберете вы? )
😁6
Сайт не висит и бокс в наличии!
🔥3❤1
[STYLEKOREAN] СЕКРЕТНЫЙ ПРЕДЗАПУСК Бокс для сияющей кожи Скидка 83% — только для вас! Не пропустите! ✨
❤3🔥1
В золотое яблоко привезли кучу новинок! Кисти и наборы ecotools и real techniques, косметика Natasha Denona, Sol de Janeiro и прочая другая запрещенка и модная Корея Braye, новинки Clio. Все такое вкусное! Промокоды работают как правило.
🎉4❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @setterbeauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Больше банок богу банок!” (@setterbeauty), 104 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/setterbeauty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.