Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Servus farsi

Channel

Servus farsi

@servus_farsi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

567subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002443897483
TypeChannel
Username@servus_farsi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 16 February 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/servus_farsi

Growth

567568567.53 September 2026 — 568 subscribers3 September 2026 — 568 subscribers11 September 2026 — 567 subscribers3 September 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 567–568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 23:57567-1
3 Sept 2026, 08:15568no change
3 Sept 2026, 08:00568first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7544.9%
6438.3%
🔥137.78%
🤗63.59%
👏31.80%
🥰21.20%
❤‍🔥10.599%
🆒10.599%
👌10.599%
💯10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC274 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

لینک اموزش خط به خط این کتاب https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOQP1SxqN0kg&si=U3Jp294AOK-GJzSu دوستان گرامی لطفا از ویدیوی بالا که در یوتیوب گذاشتم حمایت کنید. اگر حمایت کافی نباشه مجبور میشم ادامه فعالیت برای این سطح رو تمومش کنم. مطمئن باشید به روشی متفاوت و کاملا اساسی تدریس کردم. سطح ویدیو A هست ولی تا سطح C1 با هم پیش میریم اگ با من شروع کنید❤️

6

12 Oct 2025, 06:00 UTC≈1,140 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔰 Meinetwegen به خاطر من / از نظر من / برای من که مهم نیست 🔹 نوع کلمه: Adverb (قید) ⸻ ✅️ مثال‌ها: • Meinetwegen kannst du gehen. از نظر من می‌تونی بری. • Wenn du meinetwegen bleibst, fühl dich nicht verpflichtet. اگه فقط به خاطر من می‌مونی، احساس اجبار نکن. • Meinetwegen können wir das so machen. برای من که فرقی نداره، می‌تونیم این‌طوری انجامش بدیم. • – Leihst du mir dein Auto? – Meinetwegen. – ماشینتو قرض می

7🔥2❤‍🔥1

12 Oct 2025, 05:53 UTC876 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

(0:00) اسم من استیچ است. (0:02) استیچ، مشکلی ندارم. (جمله ای که راجبش امروز یاد میگیریم) (0:04) اگر استیچ نبود... (صحبت قطع می‌شود) (0:08) آیا استیچ الان باید به کشتی برود؟ (0:11) بله. (0:13) آیا استیچ می‌تواند خداحافظی کند؟ (0:16) بله. (0:17) متشکرم. (0:24) شما کی هستید؟ (0:27) این خانواده من است. (0:29) من همه چیز را خودم پیدا کردم. (0:34) کوچک و از هم پاشیده است. (0:37) اما خوب هم هست. (0:39) بله، خیلی

👍2

12 Oct 2025, 05:52 UTC876 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

(0:00) Mein Name Stitch. (0:02) Meinetwegen Stitch. (جمله ای که راجبش امروز یاد میگیریم) (0:04) Wenn Stitch nicht gewesen wäre... (0:08) Muss Stitch jetzt in das Schiff? (0:11) Ja. (0:13) Darf Stitch Wiedersehen sagen? (0:16) Ja. (0:17) Dankeschön. (0:24) Wer seid ihr? (0:27) Das ist meine Familie. (0:29) Ich habe sie ganz alleine gefunden. (0:34) Sie ist klein und kaputt. (0:37) Aber auch gut. (0:39)

5

16 Mar 2025, 07:46 UTC≈2,050 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Was ist das Gegenteil des Verbs "fangen" ? متضاد فعل "fangen" کدام گزینه است؟

  1. anfangen21%
  2. werfen42%
  3. auffangen37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍94🔥2

16 Mar 2025, 07:45 UTC≈2,020 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📌 Der Ausdruck "Lass uns Fangen spielen" bedeutet auf Deutsch "Lass uns Fangen spielen" oder "Lass uns ein Fangspiel machen". In dieser Phrase: "Lass uns" bedeutet „Lass uns“ oder „Komm, wir“ und wird verwendet, um eine Einladung oder Vorschlag zu machen. "Fangen" bedeutet "Fangen" oder das Spiel, bei dem eine Person versucht, die anderen zu fangen. Dieser Ausdruck wird normalerweise verwendet, um zu einem energis

👍11

16 Mar 2025, 07:45 UTC≈1,750 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

- Na komm schon, Zeke! Lass uns Fangen spielen! Du bist dran! + Klar! Okay, wo sind die Faultiere? In solchen Höhlen sieht man nie Faultiere. Ist euch das aufgefallen? Guck mal, Manny! Ein Mammut! ترجمه : - بیا دیگه زیک! بیا گرگم به هوا بازی کنیم! نوبت توئه! + البته! خب، تنبل‌ها (حیوان تنبل) کجان؟ تو این جور غارها هیچ‌وقت تنبل پیدا نمی‌شه. شما هم متوجه شدین؟ نگاه کن مَنی! یه ماموت! 🎬 Ice Age 2002 @Servus_farsi

8👍3🔥1

1 Mar 2025, 15:55 UTC≈1,610 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Welcher Artikel hat das Wort Ahnung ? آرتیکل کلمه Ahnung چیست ؟

  1. Der15%
  2. Die80%
  3. Das4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍71

1 Mar 2025, 15:55 UTC≈1,430 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📌Das Wort "Ahnung" bedeutet im Deutschen eine Art "Vermutung" oder "gefühlte Vorstellung" über etwas, das man nicht genau weiß. Es drückt aus, dass man eine vage Idee oder ein unklarer Eindruck über etwas hat, aber keine präzisen Informationen. Oft wird es verwendet, wenn jemand keine genauen Kenntnisse zu einem Thema hat, aber irgendwie ein Gefühl oder eine grobe Vorstellung davon hat. Im Allgemeinen wird "Ahnung"

👍72

1 Mar 2025, 15:54 UTC≈1,270 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

+ Was hat das nur zu bedeuten? - Keine Ahnung! ترجمه : + فقط این یعنی چی؟ - ایده ای ندارم ! 🎬 Harry Potter 2001 @Servus_farsi

3👍3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @servus_farsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Mar 2025, 07:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz302 voters

Was ist das Gegenteil des Verbs "fangen" ? متضاد فعل "fangen" کدام گزینه است؟

  1. anfangen21%
  2. werfen42%
  3. auffangen37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Mar 2025, 15:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz234 voters

Welcher Artikel hat das Wort Ahnung ? آرتیکل کلمه Ahnung چیست ؟

  1. Der15%
  2. Die80%
  3. Das4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Feb 2025, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz174 voters

Welcher Artikel hat das Wort Blödsinn? آرتیکل کلمه Blödsinn چیست؟

  1. Die12%
  2. Das34%
  3. Der54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2025, 09:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz125 voters

Welche Option ist das Antonym des Wortes ,,Stur" ? کدام گزینه متضاد کلمه "Stue,, است؟

  1. weich22%
  2. trotzig23%
  3. flexibel55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Feb 2025, 12:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz151 voters

Welche Option ist ein Synonym für das Verb ,,klopfen" ? کدام گزینه با فعل "klopfen,, مترادف است؟

  1. schlagen72%
  2. brechen18%
  3. öffnen11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2025 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Servus farsi” (@servus_farsi), 567 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/servus_farsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.