Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Servimat

Channel

Servimat

@servimatyoutube

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,068subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001118495832
TypeChannel
Username@servimatyoutube
DescriptionCanal de Youtube
Created4 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/servimatyoutube

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,01210,16010,0866 August 2026 — 10,160 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,160 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,152 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,149 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,146 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,142 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,138 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,134 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,138 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,140 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,139 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,136 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,132 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,126 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,125 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,120 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,116 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,109 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,110 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,111 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,104 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,101 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,098 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,096 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,084 subscribers26 September 2026 — 10,091 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,068 subscribers9 October 2026 — 10,057 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,047 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,043 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,042 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,039 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,038 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,037 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,033 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,032 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,027 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,024 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,016 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,013 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,012 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,014 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,016 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,015 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,013 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,041 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,056 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,059 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,063 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,061 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,066 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,062 subscribers11 November 2026 — 10,061 subscribers13 November 2026 — 10,068 subscribers10,0686 August 202613 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 99 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,990–10,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 22:5610,068+7
11 Nov 2026, 08:3810,061-1
9 Nov 2026, 15:5610,062-4
8 Nov 2026, 06:5610,066+5
7 Nov 2026, 04:4710,061-2
6 Nov 2026, 05:2510,063+4
5 Nov 2026, 02:5010,059+3
4 Nov 2026, 04:0010,056+15
3 Nov 2026, 06:5610,041+28
2 Nov 2026, 06:2710,013-2
1 Nov 2026, 07:0010,015-1
31 Oct 2026, 07:1610,016+2
30 Oct 2026, 04:5710,014+2
29 Oct 2026, 02:0810,012-1
26 Oct 2026, 20:0710,013-3
25 Oct 2026, 20:3610,016-8
23 Oct 2026, 16:2810,024-3
22 Oct 2026, 17:2710,027-5
21 Oct 2026, 11:4510,032-1
20 Oct 2026, 07:1110,033first reading

Engagement

330 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 10,068 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
168
of 330 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held330 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total310,117
Reactions total23,743
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,240
Videos
≈135
Links
≈2,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

45,835 reactions across 330 posts, in 66 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡6,48914.2%
👀4,66710.2%
🤬4,1479.05%
🤔3,9508.62%
🔥3,8918.49%
🤣3,6027.86%
👍2,6225.72%
😱2,2724.96%
💩2,1794.75%
👏1,4613.19%
🖕1,4153.09%
❤1,3362.91%
🤮1,2702.77%
😁9632.10%
🥱8971.96%
🤯8611.88%
🍾4530.988%
😢3640.794%
😭2310.504%
😨2190.478%
46 further kinds2,5465.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 330 of the 330 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,835 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 330 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 330 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @servimatyoutube. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 330 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 168 posts held from the last 30 days (3.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 04:58 UTC774 views85 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ÚLTIMA HORA: 🇺🇸 Informe de la Reserva Federal identifica a la inteligencia artificial como un riesgo importante para el sistema financiero de EE.UU.

🤡55🔥11🥱7👀5🎃2😁2🙉2🍌1

14 Nov 2026, 02:58 UTC≈1,140 views61 reactionsread 14 November 2026

En unos minutos más tenemos programa completamente envivo para hablar sobre todo lo que ha ocurrido en las últimas horas y lo que puede ocurrir. Espero me puedan acompañar, muchas gracias, Saludos https://www.youtube.com/live/BCbWmi9aeD4?si=EnWw9iTaXVlOEy-V

🔥30👍12👀11🤡6🍌1💅1

14 Nov 2026, 02:04 UTC≈1,290 views100 reactionsread 14 November 2026

NOTICIA DE ÚLTIMA HORA: El paro en tierra a nivel nacional finalmente se levanta después de más de cuatro horas

🤔37🤣25😐11🤡9👏6👍5🖕5❤2

14 Nov 2026, 01:55 UTC≈1,410 views124 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Esta es la explicación oficial del secretario de Transporte sobre la masiva afectación de los vuelos en Estados Unidos: "nuestro equipo es muy viejo ya. Se sobrecargó de datos. Y se colapsó" Dice que urgen 15 billones de dólares para renovar el hardware. "Tenemos torres (de tráfico aéreo) de casi cien años".

🤡59🤣43🤮6😁6👎4👍2🔥2🖕1

14 Nov 2026, 01:29 UTC≈1,350 views66 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Hacemos envivo en un rato más. Saludos

👍45❤15😱3👀1👏1🤡1

14 Nov 2026, 01:20 UTC≈1,700 views104 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Los Simpsons y su programación predictiva, saben lo que viene o simplemente le atinan. En redes sociales se ha viralizado un episodio de los Simpsons donde un gran apagón sacude a la ciudad de Springfield exactamente un 17 de Noviembre, casualmente esta fecha coincide con la prueba del Sistema de Alerta de Emergencia en Estados Unidos llevada a cabo por la agencia FEMA. https://youtu.be/V2NjccO_3r4

🤡35😱21🤔14👍8💩7🔥7👀6❤4

14 Nov 2026, 00:49 UTC≈1,490 views118 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣60👀20😱11🤔9🤡7🤬6💩5

14 Nov 2026, 00:46 UTC≈1,380 views130 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Imagínense que el ciberataque sea el 19 de noviembre para que la gente no pueda jugar GTA 6 😬 Al sistema le gusta hacer sufrir a la gente

🤣90🤡17🍾8🖕5😱4👀3😭2🤷‍♂1

13 Nov 2026, 23:51 UTC≈1,590 views122 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤡51👀26🔥13🥱12😱5🤬4🎃3🖕3

13 Nov 2026, 22:21 UTC≈1,710 views152 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Emitido por la FAA hace apenas unos momentos: TODOS los aeropuertos de EE. UU. tienen actualmente una suspensión de salidas. Esto significa que NINGÚN vuelo puede despegar con destino a aeropuertos de EE. UU. Se permitirá que aterricen los vuelos que ya estén en el aire. Esto está relacionado con una avería de los equipos de la FAA.

🔥54🥱27🤔22👀16😨11🤡9🖕5💩4

13 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,750 views154 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Bastante distópico lo de Haití: robots vs humanos

🤬61😡20💩15🤣13🖕12👀9🔥8🤡5

13 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,780 views168 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Haití lo están usando de laboratorio para probar nuevas tecnologías. Lo mismo que Ucrania.

💩54🤬46🤣15👀12🤯9👍8🤡8🤮5

Showing the 12 most recent of 330 posts we hold for @servimatyoutube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@servimatyoutube edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CR NETWORK | CR NOTICIAS - CR NEWS
@concienciaradio · 18,855
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 October 2026
Oliver Ibáñez - Canal Oficial
@oliveribanez · 18,541
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 October 2026
Simon Levy
@simonlevymx · 20,446
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Daniel Estulin
@EstulinDaniel · 20,243
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Mundo Desconocido
@Mundo_Desconocido_Oficial · 27,995
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Alfredo Jalife
@AJalife · 35,390
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
NOTICIAS OCULTAS X
@noticiasocultasxreal · 27,526
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 September 2026
Jorge Guerra - Canal de Historia
@canaljorgeguerra · 21,774
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
@PresidenteAMLO · 48,065
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Servimat” (@servimatyoutube), 10,068 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/servimatyoutube.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.