Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "Magnetic Vaxx" 💉🤔 Transhumanism, Nanotechnology, Robotics, A.I.

Channel

"Magnetic Vaxx" 💉🤔 Transhumanism, Nanotechnology, Robotics, A.I.

@magneticvaxx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,137subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425078911
TypeChannel
Username@magneticvaxx
Created31 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/magneticvaxx

Growth

1,1371,1431,1407 August 2026 — 1,143 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,143 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,138 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,136–1,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:061,137-1
12 Aug 2026, 22:431,138-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:331,143no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:151,143first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.47%
avg views ÷ 1,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total318
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @servimatyoutubePhoto

🚨🚨 ¡BOMBAZO! Bill Gates lo confiesa sin filtro: “Los humanos serán innecesarios… y NOSOTROS decidiremos si aún hacen falta” En una entrevista que pone los pelos de punta, el multimillonario se quitó la careta y soltó la verdad cruda sobre el futuro: “Gracias a la inteligencia artificial, los humanos YA NO serán necesarios para casi nada…” Cuando le preguntaron directamente: “¿Seguiremos necesitando personas?” Gates

3 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sntx_cosmicVideo

🏛️💉🇺🇸 El exdirector de los CDC, Robert Redfield, confirma – bajo juramento – que ocultaban los efectos secundarios de las vacunas contra la Covid-19: "Se tomaron decisiones inapropiadas por parte de algunos para intentar subestimar cualquier efecto secundario, porque argumentaban que esto reduciría la probabilidad de que el público se vacunara". "Uno de los mayores errores que se cometió fue imponer la obligatoried

3 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @talmudyschulchanaruckVideo

La audiencia de Fauci es circo, maroma y teatro. No contesta nada, porque tendría que seguir mintiendo, no es ningún virus ni es ganancia de función. Es nanotecnología que te introdujeron en el cuerpo, además de 56 elementos de la tabla periódica de los elementos descubiertos por la Dra., Marcela Sangorrin y Lorena di Blasi de Argentina. Los descubridores del grafeno en la inoculaciones son Ricardo Delgado y José Lui

3 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC14 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarceloDanielOteroCDSVideo

Al igual que el Dr. Luis Miguel Benito de Benito, muchos nos dimos cuenta desde el inicio de que todo era un gran engaño. Al principio no sabíamos su objetivo, pero con nuestras escasas herramientas tratábamos de descubrirlo y de alertar a nuestros conocidos para que vieran más allá de lo que informaban los medios. Lamentablemente, muy pocos lo hicieron y, aún hoy, esa gran mayoría persiste en seguir durmiendo. Pero

3 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GeneracionIAPhoto

✳️ Adobe convierte tu iPhone en estudio de fotografía con un tutor de IA Adobe lanzó AI Playground, una herramienta que lleva asistencia inteligente directamente a la cámara del iPhone. A diferencia de los editores tradicionales que solo procesan la foto después de tomarla, este sistema actúa en tiempo real: analiza la composición, la iluminación y la técnica mientras encuadras, ofreciendo sugerencias instantáneas p

31 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC26 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarceloDanielOteroCDSVideo

La censura tuvo nombres y apellidos. Horas después de que Fauci se negara a responder más de cien veces ante el Senado, el secretario de Salud de Estados Unidos apuntó contra quienes lo blindaron durante cinco años. Ese mismo día, el gobierno prohibió la ganancia de función. Terminada la audiencia, habló Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Y apuntó menos al funcionario que a las redacciones. "Cualquiera que cuestionara al Dr. Fa

31 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @talmudyschulchanaruckVideo

Fauci es un narcisista, megalómano y mentiroso: Dice el SenadorJosh Hawley (Sic). https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DSyTu1VZm/

31 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC25 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @talmudyschulchanaruckPhoto

Un descaro el de Fauci... un completo pendejo!.... Antes bien que habría la boca para decir estupideces, hoy ni siquiera dijo de qué color era su corbata! Cobarde! Rechazó contestar 111 preguntas… ¿no que él “era la ciencia”? ¿Cuál es el miedo? ¿Que oculta? Preguntas sobre las mascarillas, el distanciamiento, el origen del COVID, ocultamiento sobre la seguridad y eficacia de la Ivermectina y la Hidroxicloroquina, im

30 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sntx_cosmicVideo

🏛️👁💉🇺🇸 El Dr. Fauci admitió en su diario que, en realidad, no consideraba que el mercado de Wuhan fuera el origen del coronavirus chino Las notas del diario de Fauci revelan que, ya en enero de 2020, sostenía una versión diferente sobre el origen del virus, que contradecía la opinión que más tarde ayudó a promover públicamente. "Según los datos epidemiológicos y genómicos, el primer brote se produjo a principios de

30 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sntx_cosmicVideo

🏛👁💉🇺🇸 ACTUALIZACION: Anthony Fauci invoca la Quinta Enmienda y se niega a testificar en una audiencia del Senado sobre el COVID-19 El senador Moreno confronta a Anthony Fauci sobre el trato que se le dio al público durante la pandemia de COVID: "¿Quién demonios crees que eres para hacer eso?" @disclosetv t.me/sntx_cosmic 😏

30 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPregoVideo

El Dr. Anthony Fauci se negó a responder 111 veces, a las preguntas que le hacían los senadores en una audiencia del Senado de EE. UU. celebrada el 29 de julio de 2026. El profesor de derecho Ryan Goodman, experto en seguridad nacional y derecho constitucional, coeditor de Just Security y profesor en New York University argumenta que la estrategia del Dr. Anthony Fauci de no responder a las preguntas d ellos senado

30 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPregoVideo

El senador Ron Johnson critica duramente al Dr. Fauci por obstruir el uso de la hidroxicloroquina y la ivermectina durante la pandemia de covid, en lugar de promover una "vacuna" con efectos adversos enormes. "Usted dijo que no había evidencia de que fuera útil... ¡había todo tipo de evidencia! Los seres queridos tuvieron que demandar a los hospitales solo para poder probar esos medicamentos. Me gustaría saber, ¿h

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @magneticvaxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 973,786 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"Magnetic Vaxx" 💉🤔 Transhumanism, Nanotechnology, Robotics, A.I.” (@magneticvaxx), 1,137 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magneticvaxx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.