Channel
@servbest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
481subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002046262605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @servbest |
| Description | Канал Маркетолога-Сервисолога о маркетинге, клиентском сервисе и метасообщениях Консалтинг БизнесСкан @softskill_rules Сотрудничество @softskill_rules |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/servbest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 481 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 481 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (16 November 2025 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 31 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 38.9% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5224199078400775063 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5411102349882052523 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Реальность сейчас такая Переизбыток информации, знаний уже до фига, голова - "Дом советов" Принимаем решения, исходя не из того, что происходит на самом деле. А из того, как объясняем себе происходящее. Хотя достаточно изменить способ смотреть на нее. И тогда следующий шаг становится очевидным.
🔥4
Ты управляешь или тобой управляют? И так во всем...
Вот где весь снег! Последнюю декаду декабря частый вопрос: как у тебя настроение, новогоднее? От того, что Ёлку в центре города поставили ещё в конце ноября, настроение новогоднее не появится. Без снега....никакого волшебства...а всем так хочется сказки. Да ещё и китайцы даже тут нас обогнали. Товарищи, цените зиму! Чтобы гулять при +13°С 20го декабря, мы (южане) платим зимой в марте и новым годом в тумане (не пут…
🔥6
"Извините меня за это!" или зыринг-тыринг и другие чудеса заимствований. "Извините нас за ..." - тренд забугорного рынка услуг. Здесь упонимание о тренде https://youtube.com/shorts/jq7DxDrPAcc?si=v4pGaWZnBMC7b9sk Ниже мой комментарий по этому поводу. 1. Классно, когда бизнесы адаптируют креативные и/или вирусные идеи из других ниш/рынков под свою модель. 2. И как будто везде живут люди со схожими страхами, чаяниями…
👍6🔥2custom 54111023498820525232
Скоро во всех каналах, блогах, пабликах... Ну конечно, итоги года. Благодаря ИИ у нас ещё хошь/не хошь итоги года в Яндексе, на YouTube и других платформах. Типа не только ты взаимодействуешь с ними, но и они с тобой через такую обратную связь. Когда уже будут рассылать advent календари...ну хотя бы виртуальные?)))))
👍8👏2custom 52241990784007750632
Брендинг на диджейском пульте Оказалось, что бренд может быть в центре вечеринки не только за счет лайтбокса и экрана. Изящное решение 💛 Это закрытие сезона 2025 от Станции метро Горьковская @metrogorkovskaya в эти выходные в Нижнем Новгороде при поддержке Т-Банка.
🔥6
Маркетологи, конечно, креативные ребята, но... Вроде бы акция на привлечение-вовлечение, а получается сами в ногу себе стреляют. Кто тоже принял 10 за 1% скидки?
👏5
QR-коды чернее черного Мы уже привыкли, что qr-коды - удобный и быстрый вид контакта: по нему ты сразу переходишь в соцсети, мессенджер или на сайт, можно быстро оплачивать услуги, получать нужную информацию. Теперь через qr-код мошенники пытаются получить доступ ко всем вашим аккаунтам (фин. организации, госуслуги и тп) в телефоне. Противоядие только одно - бдительность. Конечно, гарантий нет нигде, но если вы…
👍3👀2
Ты точно не знаешь этого о конструкторе LEGO И это не какой-то секрет. Они решили не выпячивать в рекламе свой жест доброй воли и ответственности перед покупателями. Помнишь, конструктор состоит из мелких деталей, порой менее 1 см? Часто дети просто их проглатывают. У родителей паника, травмпункт, неизвестность. Врачи же могут рассмотреть на рентгене даже самую маленькую деталь благодаря добавлению в краску сульфа…
🔥6custom 52241990784007750631
Или как выглядит заигрывание с аудиторией)))) В лифте
👍6custom 52241990784007750631
Маркетолог озабочен...🤔 Да не тем🤭😂😂
👍5👀3🍓2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @servbest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сЭмпатичный Маркетолог | Yelena K” (@servbest), 481 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/servbest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.