Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

X-cessive Mastermind

@serpentpwr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

525subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001364151243
TypeChannel
Username@serpentpwr
DescriptionПуть Дурака. Я не Гуру. Я просто ною. Задать вопрос: @Rundeep_bot
Created1 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/serpentpwr

Growth

5255 Aug 2026, 19:55 — 525 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:31 — 525 subscribers5 Aug 2026, 19:556 Aug 2026, 18:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 524–526 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:31525no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:55525first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 525 subscribers
Avg views / post
190
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,423
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,240
Videos
167
Links
302

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4276.4%
🌚916.4%
🤡47.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serpentpwr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC270 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Увидимся в сентябре

❤‍🔥8

5 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,700 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Единственное с чем не согласен, что колобок это «кусок теста». С солярными символами надо аккуратнее. Особенно с хлебно-солярными.

🤡2

5 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @muscaiajenjo

Идёт жаркий спор между сторонниками фильма про то, как спасают мир некрасивые-бебифейс американцы и авторами фильма, в котором Гарик Харламов озвучил говорящий кусок теста. Спор возник вокруг показов фильмов в кинотеатрах: первый начали показывать позднее в угоду второму. Средний возраст лица, участвующего в медийном противостоянии — 34.5 лет. Оба фильма предназначены для аудитории 6-12 лет. Ходит ли кто-то из них

5 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kargspiracyPhoto

👁Жители Москвы приняли за Бафомета статую йога-козы в Парке Горького. Голубую скульптуру с белым цветком во лбу установил производитель детского питания. Жители решили, что она напоминает демонического козла с пугающей улыбкой и прищуром, и отметили, что сатанизм признан экстремизмом и запрещён в РФ. Рекламная композиция, судя по логотипу, принадлежит производителю детских смесей из сухого козьего молока.

🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC84 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @soymemPhoto

Некоторые люди платят от пяти тысяч рублей за сеанс с этими птушницами, которые пошли в психологини из-за слишком кривых для маникюрщицы рук, и людей потом распирает от собственной осознанности.

❤‍🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC121 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Часы на обезьяне

❤‍🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3🌚2

3 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC112 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Напоминание всем клиентам и ученикам, что если будете плохо себя вести то с сентября мы переходим на развитой капитализм где счета будут прилетать за вообще все

❤‍🔥3🌚2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @serpentpwr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 312,395 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“X-cessive Mastermind” (@serpentpwr), 525 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serpentpwr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.