Channel
@seriy_kardinal_telegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,060subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001670775491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seriy_kardinal_telegram |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seriy_kardinal_telegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 4,060 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 4,061 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 4,058 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 4,072 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 4,077 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 4,077 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,621 |
| Reactions total | 103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 31.1% | |
| custom 5370719521176846568 | 29 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 16.5% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 15.5% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 7.77% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.971% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Смертельный бой. Кто выживет? 12 и 13 августа на онлайн-шоу-форуме «ЭЙВА: Деньги и Система» сойдутся два клана. 🌿 Клан Леса доказывает, что бизнес растёт через быстрые деньги, сильные офферы и продажи. 💧 Клан Воды отстаивает системы, воронки, автоматизацию и масштабирование. Каждый уверен, что его путь сильнее. Вот это меня и зацепило. Обычно спикера зовут выступить. Тут зовут биться за сторону. Я выступаю за…
❤3👍2
Настя, честно говоря, я просто в шоке, сколько всего ты делаешь для нас! Даже такие бездельники (в своих соцсетях), как я, начинают шевелиться и получать результаты😅 Я рада, что я в СТАЕ♥️
❤2🔥1
Расскажу, как устроен август в Стае 🐦⬛️. Интересна прежде всего конструкция Такую систему я раньше не стала бы собирать: слишком много связей, слишком долго. Сейчас между идеей и запуском стоит вечер работы с нейросетями, поэтому упрощать замысел не пришлось. Тема августа — контент, который работает. 1️⃣ Четыре эфира по вторникам — 4 августа. Анатомия поста: что и зачем ты пишешь. Разобрали виды постов и структу…
👍4custom 53707195211768465684❤3
🤦🏻♀️ Посмотрите, что они со мной сделали. Да, с лицом всё нормально. Хотя после последних пары месяцев я уже не уверена. 😂 Ловлю себя на мысли, что рынок стал одинаковым. Каждую неделю запуски, конференции, вебинары — открываешь программу, а там те же темы и те же советы. И тут мне пишут: — Хотим пригласить вас спикером. Я почти отказалась, на автомате. Потом открыла концепцию и поняла, что ребята поехали 😂 Он…
🤩8❤6👍4
Фотографии с офлайн-тренинга готовы 🐦⬛ 25 июля разбирали ниши, придумывали инструменты под конкретные проекты и считали, как на этом заработать. 13 человек, четыре часа и полный зал идей. Отдельно: на платформе Стаи появился новый раздел — галерея. Туда выгружаю фотографии со всех мероприятий. Больше не нужно искать ссылку на Яндекс.Диск в переписке трехмесячной давности. Заходишь в галерею — находишь себя, забир…
👍5🔥3custom 53707195211768465682❤1
Моя жизнь изменилась, когда Кардинал🐦⬛ посмотрел на меня Сегодня последний день когда вы можете присоединиться к Стае с сохранением доступа ко всему архиву за 9 месяцев. Это не манипуляция, а техническая особенность. Помните что я запустила свою образовательную платформу? Так вот доступ как раз этим и связан. Смотреть 36 эфиров не станет никто. А вот воспользоваться интеллектуальным поиском по всему архиву Стаи —…
custom 53707195211768465688
Posted without readable text
🔥9custom 53707195211768465683❤2
В Стае🐦⬛ завершился второй поток мастермайндов. Показываю, что участники сделали за 7 недель — и почему это вообще работает. Формат простой: группа из 6–8 человек, каждую неделю встреча, задача на неделю и отчёт перед своими. Те же самые задачи, которые в одиночку откладываются месяцами, в группе просто делаются. Ведь никто не хочет прийти на встречу и сказать: а я ничего не сделала. Три группы, около 20 экспер…
custom 53707195211768465685❤4👍2😍1
Пришли все 13 человек. Кто хоть раз собирал офлайн — знает, что такое редко бывает. Обычно треть отваливается в последний момент: заболел, не рассчитал время, «в следующий раз обязательно». А тут полный состав, и я до сих пор в хорошем смысле не отошла. Собирались на Знаменке. Я редко выбираюсь в центр, всё больше онлайн, и каждый раз забываю, как это заряжает: идёшь по городу к месту встречи и уже настраиваешься н…
❤11custom 53707195211768465687🔥3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @seriy_kardinal_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 127,666 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Серый кардинал маркетинга” (@seriy_kardinal_telegram), 4,060 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seriy_kardinal_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.