8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,226–18,369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:37
18,352
+82
11 Aug 2026, 13:35
18,270
+10
10 Aug 2026, 10:17
18,260
+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:33
18,258
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:56
18,257
+2
7 Aug 2026, 07:14
18,255
+13
6 Aug 2026, 02:16
18,242
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:31
18,242
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.6%
avg views ÷ 18,352 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,900
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
14 (31 May 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
62,090
Reactions total
1,023
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
644
Videos
79
Links
634
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,709 reactions across 14 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
477
27.9%
🔥
400
23.4%
👍
372
21.8%
💯
172
10.1%
🎉
110
6.44%
👎
37
2.17%
👏
31
1.81%
🙏
29
1.70%
🥴
23
1.35%
🤔
20
1.17%
🥱
10
0.585%
😁
7
0.41%
🤯
7
0.41%
⚡
4
0.234%
🌭
3
0.176%
🐳
3
0.176%
🌚
2
0.117%
🤣
1
0.059%
🤩
1
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,709reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 14 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seriesman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Недавно вышел второй сезон прекрасного сериала «Соперники». У нас он большой популярности не сыскал, а зря. Во времена пуританства, цензуры и всевозможных запретов это настоящая жемчужина крепкой драматургии, смелого юмора и довольно пикантного содержания.
В наше время ничего нельзя, а если что-то можно, то это ненадолго. Поэтому творцы все чаще устремляют свой уставший от цензуры взор в прошлое. Наши сериалоделы ко…
Усы! Мяч! Игрушка!
Сегодня с 4 сезоном вернулся лучший и всеми любимый усатый футбольный тренер Тед Лассо.
По такому случаю дарим коллекционную арт-игрушку Теда от художника Макса Елисеева.
Для участия в конкурсе нужно:
• подписаться на трех Максов — Театр Русской Игрушки, Макс и сериалы, Серийный человек — и на одну Юлю the bingewatcher
• пнуть воображаемый мяч
• нажать на кнопку «участвовать»
• забить воображае…
Сериалов выходит много, и выделиться на фоне этого потока сложно. А ведь так можно и крутой проект пропустить - например, «Максимальное удовольствие гарантировано». Если описывать сюжет без спойлеров, всё может показаться довольно вторичным: женщина средних лет в разводе становится свидетелем убийства вебкам-модели и оказывается втянута в череду неприятностей. Вроде бы всё по отдельности мы уже видели, но в этом прое…
Я достаточно давно веду блог, и хейтом меня не удивить. Но только начав работать в киноиндустрии, понял, что до этого были цветочки. Не знаю, в чем истинная причина - менталитете или общей напряженности последних лет - но отечественная аудитория порой считает своим долгом обрушить на очередную жертву все возможные оскорбления и угрозы, а заодно устроить падение рейтинга на всех агрегаторах. Зачастую даже не ознакомив…
В августе нам опять предстоит путешествие по мирам «Темной материи», шайка снова будет зажигать в «В Филадельфии всегда солнечно», а усатый тренер «Тед Лассо» вновь будет причинять всем добро и любовь. Среди новинок — «Осколки» от автора «Американского психопата» и «Большая фарма», которую написал Олег Маловичко — автор «Трассы» и «Хрустального». В общем, август обещает быть интересным — давайте разбираться, какие се…
Чак Лорри не только создатель крутых сериалов («Два с половиной человека», «Майк и Молли», «Теория большого взрыва»), но и мастер спин-оффов. «Детство Шелдона» и «Первый брак Джорджа и Мэнди» не паразитируют на оригинале и что еще важнее — предлагают зрителям новые миры и героев, в которых сложно не влюбиться.
Тем любопытнее выглядел анонс «Стюарт Блум не смог спасти Вселенную», комедийного фантастического ситкома о…
Окко — 15 лет🎉
Онлайн-кинотеатр встречает этот возраст в отличной форме. Мы тут попытались выбрать всего пять любимых сериалов — и это оказалось неожиданно сложно!
До сих пор бегут мурашки от шедевральной «Трассы». С героями «Волшебного участка» я бы с удовольствием пропустил по пинте. «Ласт Квест» так и остается для меня одним из самых сильных визуальных впечатлений среди российских сериалов. «Ира» — редкий случай…
Героями нового выпуска Серийного подкаста стали Андрей Липов и Макс Максимов. Возможно, вы не слышали их имена, но эти парни из Минска запускают самые успешные франшизы в стране и, кажется, открыли секрет популярности зрительского кино. Поговорили про киноиндсутрию, поиск идей для фильмов и много чего еще.
Смотреть на YouTube
Смотреть ВК Видео
«Холод» начинается мрачно. Над затянутой тучами Москвой пролетают два вертолета. В них не менее мрачные люди явно задумывают что-то нехорошее. Мрачный — ключевая характеристика «Холода». Но мрачный не значит плохой.
За сценарий и режиссуру тут единолично отвечает Алексей Казаков, ворвавшийся в индустрию с легендарным «Горько» (лично мне у него нравится «Бешенство»). И для меня это была главная причина для просмотра:…
Последний месяц оказался настолько насыщенным, что я почти выпал из сериалосмотрения. Но лучше поздно, чем никогда. Давайте же обсудим «Паука-Нуара» с Николасом Кейджем. Скажу сразу: смотрел в чёрно-белой версии и считаю это единственно правильным вариантом.
Что это, если не проект мечты? Одно из самых оригинальных прочтений известного супергероя (привет мультивселенным) в эстетике «Мальтийского сокола» и без оглядо…
1 июля - особенный день! Не только из-за традиционного календаря премьер, но и потому, что у меня сегодня день рождения😎 Поздравления можно оставлять в формате лайков и комментариев под новым видео - это правда очень ценно в наше время. Рад быть с вами сегодня и каждый день🎉🥂
Месяц богат на яркие, хоть и не громкие проекты: приквел «Блондинки в законе», спин-офф «Рика и Морти», очередной «Призрак в доспехах». Оригин…
❤122🎉105🔥25
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @seriesman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@seriesman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 86,718 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Серийный Человек” (@seriesman), 18,352 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seriesman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
