Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Серийный Человек

Channel

Серийный Человек

@seriesman

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,773subscribers

-469 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001081173922
TypeChannel
Username@seriesman
DescriptionСценарист и продюсер Макс Казанцев. Иногда пишу про сериалы. Реклама и сотрудничество: @arinaefmay Регистрация РКН https://clck.ru/3MSYT2
Created2 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/seriesman

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,77218,35218,0626 August 2026 — 18,242 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,242 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,255 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,257 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,260 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,270 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,352 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,296 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,263 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,238 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,220 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,213 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,206 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,203 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,202 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,189 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,170 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,162 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,154 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,147 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,125 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,118 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,113 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,112 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,101 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,098 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,081 subscribers7 September 2026 — 18,061 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,039 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,030 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,016 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,997 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,983 subscribers1 October 2026 — 17,923 subscribers6 October 2026 — 17,909 subscribers11 October 2026 — 17,869 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,855 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,851 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,840 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,842 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,837 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,832 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,836 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,835 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,826 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,824 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,826 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,813 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,816 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,815 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,808 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,797 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,790 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,794 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,788 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,780 subscribers7 November 2026 — 17,777 subscribers9 November 2026 — 17,772 subscribers11 November 2026 — 17,773 subscribers17,7736 August 202611 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 97 days, net -469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,685–18,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 01:4617,773+1
9 Nov 2026, 11:4517,772-5
7 Nov 2026, 16:5417,777-3
6 Nov 2026, 12:4417,780-8
5 Nov 2026, 10:5917,788-6
4 Nov 2026, 07:0817,794+4
1 Nov 2026, 10:1617,790-7
31 Oct 2026, 11:4717,797-11
30 Oct 2026, 09:4717,808-7
29 Oct 2026, 11:0617,815-1
28 Oct 2026, 10:1017,816+3
27 Oct 2026, 07:2117,813-13
26 Oct 2026, 06:2517,826+2
25 Oct 2026, 07:1017,824-2
24 Oct 2026, 08:3617,826-9
23 Oct 2026, 11:3717,835-1
21 Oct 2026, 08:5017,836+4
20 Oct 2026, 03:2617,832-5
19 Oct 2026, 02:2817,837-5
17 Oct 2026, 02:4917,842first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.4%
avg views ÷ 17,773 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,410
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held32 (31 May 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total37,870
Reactions total702
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 04:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
672
Videos
80
Links
649

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,627 reactions across 32 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,08629.9%
🔥96726.7%
👍85223.5%
💯2095.76%
🎉1133.12%
🤔691.90%
👎671.85%
😁541.49%
👏481.32%
🙏411.13%
🥱270.744%
🥴270.744%
🍌180.496%
👌120.331%
🤯80.221%
⚡60.165%
🌚40.11%
🌭40.11%
🐳40.11%
🤣40.11%
5 further kinds70.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,627 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 32 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seriesman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,620 views66 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Лет десять назад я смотрел разнообразные ютуб-каналы и вдохновлялся. Хотелось тоже сделать что-нибудь такое (в итоге появился «Серийный человек»). Одним из таких каналов был «Кино огонь». И остаётся им до сих пор. Некоторые видео ребят я бы рекомендовал показывать в киношколах, настолько они полезны. Да и помимо пользы, команда «Кино огонь» обладает вкусом и хорошим чувством юмора. Если не подписаны на них, то рекоме…

🔥42👍14❤6🎉2⚡1👏1

1 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC≈5,230 views109 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

В ноябре возвращается «Институт» по Стивену Кингу, «Властелин колец: Кольца власти» продолжает доказывать, что даже плохой сериал можно снимать бесконечно, а «Шершни» наконец-то готовятся к финалу. Из новинок нас ждут отечественный «Тяжёлый люкс» и «Бегущий по лезвию 2099», который вряд ли убежит от гнева зрителей. Ну и «Дорогуша» возвращается, чтобы снова напомнить: тихони бывают очень опасными. Собрал главные сери…

❤63👍32🔥14

31 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC≈5,330 views107 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Критики и обзорщики часто упрекают фильмы и сериалы в штампах и клише. Хотя, чтобы стать штампом, нужно сначала придумать какой-то универсальный ход, который аудитория будет моментально считывать. Одним из таких клише стал слэшер в летнем лагере. И во многом благодарить за это нужно «Пятницу, 13-е». В отличие от Майкла Майерса и франшизы «Хэллоуин», Джейсону Вурхиз как-то не очень везло. После удачного первого фильм…

❤51🔥29👍11💯10👌3⚡1🍌1🤔1

26 Oct 2026, 09:50 UTC≈6,350 views110 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ох, не хотела ничего писать, потому что посмотрела сериал сразу после премьеры (да, залпом), поэтому уже отгорело. Кстати, за релиз Amazon как раз нужно похвалить: Флэнаган сменил Netflix на Prime Video, но мы уже привыкли бинджить его сериалы осенними вечерами. К тому же выход по серии в неделю стал бы для «Кэрри» совсем приговором. О моих впечатлениях сложно говорить без спойлеров, поэтому ниже будет блок для тех,…

🔥43🤔23❤14👎12💯9👍3😁3😱2

26 Oct 2026, 09:50 UTC≈5,360 views33 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👏15❤8👍7👌3

24 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC≈6,520 views193 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, досмотрел я «Кэрри» под негодование соседних киношных и сериальных каналов. Сериал не понравился даже Нине, второму человеку на этом канале. Поэтому смотрел настороженно. И всё, о чём предупреждали, оказалось на месте: затянутость, несоответствие оригиналу, лишние сюжетные линии. Но есть нюанс: я остался в полном восторге. На мой взгляд, это одна из лучших экранизаций Стивена Кинга, местами даже превосходящая…

❤114🔥32👍28🤔9💯7👌2🤨1

15 Oct 2026, 08:31 UTC≈7,460 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Не люблю я все эти громкие ярлыки вроде «главный сериал года», но иногда они действительно оказываются уместны. И «Полураспад», на мой взгляд, как раз такой случай. Я уже писал об этом сериале раньше, а теперь первые две серии наконец вышли в Okko. Поэтому просто приглашаю вас посмотреть их, а потом вернуться сюда и обсудить впечатления в комментариях. Мне правда интересно, что вы скажете. На постере — один из самы…

🔥38👍28❤12🍌6

12 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC≈7,970 views56 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, в октябре будет возможность увидеться живьём! Если вам интересно, как устроена сценарная кухня изнутри, почему одни комедии смешные, а другие не очень, и как вообще придумываются истории, которые мы потом смотрим на экранах, то приходите! 25 октября вместе с замечательными коллегами буду разбирать комедийные сценарии на встрече клуба «Чуткий редактор» Московской школы кино. Будем обсуждать, спорить, искать…

❤30🔥13👍10💯2😁1

11 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC≈8,270 views137 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

В этом октябре нам повезло с хоррорами. Пока я ждал появления всех серий «Кэрри» в нормальном дубляже, решил глянуть «Глубину» и очнулся только на финальных титрах. Давно со мной такого не было. Я, конечно, большой поклонник морских монстров, но тут авторы провернули такой трюк, что невольно восхищаешься их слабоумием и отвагой. Ньюфаундленд, Канада. Жителям маленького острова запретили ловить рыбу, поэтому теперь о…

👍87❤25🔥15🤔5💯2😁2👌1

1 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC≈9,320 views132 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Октябрь. Самый разгар сериального сезона, и в этом месяце есть чего ждать. Выходит долгожданный «Полдень» по Стругацким, Майк Флэнаган представит свою версию «Кэрри», а еще нас ждёт «Хрустальное озеро» — приквел «Пятницы, 13-е». Ну и без возвращения старых знакомых тоже не обойдётся. Собрал главные сериальные премьеры октября в одном видео. Что будете смотреть? Пишите в комментариях. Смотреть на YouTube Смотреть В…

🔥86❤29👍13💯3😁1

29 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC≈9,920 views123 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Пока на Западе снова входит в моду отчетливый авторский голос в сериалах и фильмах («Бухта вдов», «Фонари», «Обитель зла», «Обсессия»), мы только встаем на этот непростой путь. Оно, понятное дело, тяжело дается продюсерам. На кону большие бабки, а зритель же недалекий: ему бы попроще, все разжевать, все максимально усреднить. Благо зритель регулярно доказывает, что не дурак. Особенно сильно под тиски редакторских и …

🔥51❤35👍24👎6🤔3🤣3😍1

26 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈9,130 views108 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Во времена переизбытка фильмов и сериалов продюсеры все чаще стараются искать безопасные пути к сердцам зрителей. IP с уже сформированной фанатской базой — лучшее решение. Когда закончились книги, игры и комиксы, в ход пошли песни и поговорки, а теперь дело дошло до слухов. Почему бы, собственно, и нет. Сериал «Братья» обыгрывает давнюю байку о том, что Мэттью Макконахи и Вуди Харрельсон могут быть братьями. Актеры …

👍64❤27🔥13😐2🎉1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @seriesman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@seriesman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Makar Drimchukov | Woodmark
@drimchukov · 20,578
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
КИНО CLUB
@filmoclub · 22,900
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Серийный Человек” (@seriesman), 17,773 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seriesman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.