Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

МЕЛП

@melphere

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,691subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001227297920
TypeChannel
Username@melphere
DescriptionВеду Кино Огонь. Пишу нечеловечески длинные рецензии. Коммерческое сотрудничество: @vera_melp Творческое сотрудничество: @melllpet
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/melphere

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

10,500 average views per post against 9,691 subscribers — an engagement rate of 108.7%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled115,840
Mature posts only108.7% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers9,691 measured 8 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8%
Position in cohort99.205th percentile · 7.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.044% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,6919,6959,6936 August 2026 — 9,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,695 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,691 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,690–9,696 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:149,691-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:309,695no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:529,695first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.7%
avg views ÷ 9,691 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held14 (4 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total115,840
Reactions total6,199
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
973
Videos
26
Links
343

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6,933 reactions across 14 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,72353.7%
❤‍🔥75910.9%
🔥5648.14%
😁5127.38%
🎉3725.37%
👏2673.85%
👍2213.19%
🤯941.36%
🍾741.07%
🥰640.923%
💯500.721%
👎380.548%
😭350.505%
🤔350.505%
200.288%
😢140.202%
🥱130.188%
💅120.173%
💔110.159%
😱90.13%
10 further kinds460.663%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,933reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈4,430 views318 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тед Лассо вернулся как-то внезапно, несмотря на все анонсы, и я так от этого опешил, что решил почему-то не ждать, а сразу присесть в онгоинг. Не думаю, что будет повод собираться после каждой серии, но по первой есть, что сказать... Собственно, все хорошо? Всегда, когда запускаешь новый сезон сериала, есть риск поймать "о-оу" эффект, и такой даже слегка был в третьем сезоне, но тут его нет. Разгрузили качественную

235👍49🔥28❤‍🔥3👎2👏1

1 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈16,200 views734 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Одиссея — прекрасное кино, и я не перестаю о нем думать с момента просмотра. К сожалению, это не означает, что у него нет проблем. Есть два слона в комнате, которые не дают мне сразу перейти к восторгам. Во-первых, объем — первоисточник настолько грандиозен, что впихнуть его даже в 3 часа получается только через жесточайше спрессованный монтаж и периодические экспозиционные стенки текста. Мне кажется, некоторые эпиз

454🔥138💯49👎26🤔24👍12😁11🤯9

29 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC≈8,950 views511 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

IMAX vs Обычный экран: Еще по одной (реж. Т. Винтеберг)

😁361109🔥21💅9👍4👀3🌚2👏1

27 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC≈9,650 views269 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

История игрушек 5 — первый фильм серии, который не оставил после просмотра какой-то яркой эмоции. Нет, он не плохой — но что-то и хорошего, за которое я люблю первые четыре части, в этот раз особо не завезли. #БР26 Для меня История игрушек — это 1. Грандиозное приключение, 2. Обилие плотнейших кеков и 3. Доля здоровой сентиментальности. Вот по какой-то причине пятая часть вдруг сменила вектор и оказалась в основном

178🔥45👍14🤔10🤯10😭72👏2

26 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC≈8,260 views294 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Хейтеры говорили, что День разоблачения не вывозит, и были правы. К сожалению, отличная аналитика от хейтеров. #БР26 Я очень, очень ждал новый развлекательный фильм Спилберга. Его ностальгические заходы, конечно, были ничего и кому-то прям нравятся, но глубокой связи с ними я не прочувствовал - а вот последнее на данный момент развлекалово гения все ещё вспоминаю с теплом. А тем более триллер, тем более, про иноплан

135👏58👍31😭2718💔11🌚4👌3

25 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC≈6,250 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📚 Алексей Конаков — Табия 32 🤔 1. Современная российская антиутопия? 2. Напечатанная?? 3. Про шахматы?!? Услышал это и дальше ничего не помню, побежал-купил. Ну и... оно как бы норм... но как бы и могло быть лучше. Сюжет: через полвека в РФ уничтожено все отечественное литературное наследие (типа в нем корни империализма), а замена — шахматы. Завязка необычная, и как шахматисту читать оч занятно: концентрация отсылок

121❤‍🔥47👍15🔥6🌚2😱2👎1👏1

22 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC≈22,400 views2,265 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Петр Мельников перевдохновился бомбардирской статистикой прошедшего Чемпионата мира по футболу и решил оформить, так сказать, дубль. В настоящий момент мы по-прежнему ожидаем дополнительный комментарий от Яны Петровны Мельниковой, которой теперь с этим разбираться. Ее первый и основной комментарий к данной минуте уместился в многократное повторение буквы А В настоящий момент команда уже проходит сонные сборы, отраб

1,240❤‍🔥430🎉371🤯75🍾73🥰37🔥21😱7

20 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC≈9,900 views303 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Последний пост по Чемпионату мира! Это закончилось, и, с одной стороны, как всегда немного грустно — с другой, мозг прям порадовался, что можно на что-то переключиться, и к кино вернуться поосновательнее, и по клубам что-то соскучился. Но давайте напоследок по итогам! Франция — Англия 4:6 Лучший матч турнира, обожаю расслабленность бронзовых каток, в которых происходит какая-то чушь. В этот раз команды еще и особенн

223👏43👍23👎6🔥4🎉1👌1🤡1

18 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC≈9,450 views978 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Петр Мельников в объективе Нины Петровны Мельниковой. Стиль и образ: Нина Петровна Мельникова

606🔥206😁100❤‍🔥32🥰18👍7👏5💋4

16 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC≈11,100 views160 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну, второй ЧМ подряд я точно угадываю финалистов по принципу "Худший по-болельщицки финал из возможных". Радует ли это меня больше, чем который подряд финал Эскобара? Абсолютно нет, но имеем, что имеем. Лучшего просмотра в этот раз не было, так что просто про оба матча: Франция — Испания 0:2 Был очень очарован атакующей игрой французов и уверовал в их фаворитство — хотя знаки против были. Испания оставила сильное вп

👏6653😁22👍9💩4❤‍🔥2🤡2🍾1

14 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈9,250 views172 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну, два денька передохнули и полетели к полуфиналам! 1/4 уже ощущалась более-менее проложенными рельсами к большим столкновениям, а теперь-то пойдет самая драма. Лучший просмотр: Норвегия — Англия 1:2 В целом, порадовался бы проходу любой из команд, так еще и персонально болею за Беллингема, так что просмотр получился исключительно приятный. Заруба была огненная, норвежцы красавцы, не хватило совсем чуть-чуть. Прито

👏7165🔥14😢10🤮7🥰3👎1🥴1

9 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC≈10,400 views166 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1/8 вновь напомнила про обратную сторону Чемпионата мира — неизбежную воронку неироничной депры ближе к финалу 😅 Спасибо дню перерыва, хоть чутка перевел дух, готов к новым ударам! Лучший просмотр: Бразилия — Норвегия 1:2 Как же обидно, что Англию и Мексику унесли на 4 часа ночи! Приходится довольствоваться этой неплохой зарубой, вытащенной лютой аурой Холланда. Худший просмотр: Португалия — Испания 0:1 По факту, к

115🔥24👍13🥱9👏4😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @melphere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 383,202 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МЕЛП” (@melphere), 9,691 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/melphere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.