3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 340–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:15
340
-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:02
341
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
341
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
628 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
313
49.8%
🔥
69
11.0%
custom 5208442406759841558
45
7.17%
custom 5226484078311645103
42
6.69%
🎉
32
5.10%
custom 5922281639395726253
28
4.46%
😍
19
3.03%
☃
15
2.39%
👍
13
2.07%
custom 5208507260766011396
11
1.75%
🤗
10
1.59%
🤩
10
1.59%
custom 5208771749147069796
9
1.43%
🎄
7
1.11%
🙏
4
0.637%
🥰
1
0.159%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 628reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sergey_laoshi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 November 2025 to 18 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Новая лекция онлайн-лектория ИИЯ LingvoSphere: «Стихи о пограничных заставах и военных походах эпохи Тан (618–907)»✏️
⚡️Онлайн-лекторий ИИЯ LingvoSphere представляет лекцию доцента кафедры восточных языков, кандидата философских наук Марии Владимировны Анашиной.
📖Новая лекция откроет золотой век китайской поэзии с неожиданной, героической стороны. Мы привыкли представлять поэзию Тан как изящные пейзажные зарисовки …
ДЕСЯТЬ ЗНАМЕНИТЫХ ТРАДИЦИОННЫХ ЦВЕТОВ КИТАЯ
Китай знаменит своими цветами. Но какие из них наиболее почитаемы? Трудно ответить на этот вопрос.
С 20 ноября 1986 года по 5 апреля 1987 года в Шанхае состоялись выборы десяти самых знаменитых традиционных цветов Китая (中国传统十大名花评选), в которых приняли участие 22 растения.
В результате было отобрано десять цветов: слива, пион, хризантема, орхидея, китайская роза, азалия, …
Сегодня по китайскому лунному календарю наступает Канун Нового года 除夕 chúxī, а завтра вся Поднебесная будет отмечать Новый год - Праздник Весны 春节 chūnjié. В этом году в месяце Лаюэ 腊月 làyuè только 29 дней, поэтому канун Нового года придется на 29-е число. Завершатся новогодние дни Праздником фонарей 元宵节 yuánxiāojié в 15-й день первого месяца, который в этом году наступит 3 марта.
В Канун Нового года идут последние…
哈利·波特
hālì bōtè
Гарри Поттер 🚂🧹✉️
Фильмы на китайском 🎥
1️⃣哈利·波特与魔法石
«Гарри Поттер и философский камень»
2️⃣哈利·波特与密室
«Гарри Поттер и Тайная комната»
3️⃣哈利·波特与阿兹卡班的囚徒
«Гарри Поттер и узник Азкабана»
4️⃣ 哈利·波特与凤凰社
«Гарри Поттер и Орден Феникса»
#看电影 #китайскийязык
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sergey_laoshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Китайский лаоши 🇨🇳 汉语” (@sergey_laoshi), 340 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sergey_laoshi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
