Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SergeCore Life

Channel

SergeCore Life

@sergecoreLIFE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

514subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002122484291
TypeChannel
Username@sergecoreLIFE
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sergecoreLIFE

Growth

51419 Aug 2026, 20:30 — 514 subscribers20 Aug 2026, 19:45 — 514 subscribers19 Aug 2026, 20:3020 Aug 2026, 19:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 513–515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 19:45514no change
19 Aug 2026, 20:30514first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.0%
avg views ÷ 514 subscribers
Avg views / post
267
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held16 (31 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total1,603
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 57s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7963.7%
❤‍🔥1612.9%
💋86.45%
😍54.03%
🤷‍♀43.23%
👀32.42%
💯32.42%
🤣32.42%
🙈21.61%
🙏10.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC340 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Танец сам по себе — прежде всего искусство и практика, а не наука. Но его возможно изучать только научно, и поэтому существует отдельное направление — танцевальная наука / dance studies: она исследует историю, культуру, эстетику, способы восприятия и развития танца. Где же в танце Наука? Танцор постоянно применяет закономерности нескольких наук, даже если не называет их так: ☑️Биомеханика и анатомия: как распредели

9💋1

11 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC240 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Танец - это Наука, но частично 😉 Сейчас уже понемногу начинаю готовиться к предстоящему танцевальному году, работаю с музыкой , прорабатываю концепцию будущего концерта , идеи и все сопутствующие. Ну и в процессе помимо само собой практики ( курс Зуба полным ходом, но сам Зуб очень «долгий»😁), работаю и изучаю теорию, мысли и факты, которые часто очень важны для понимания. Чтобы было не вот это эмоциональное руковод

6

7 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC324 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

☝️⭕️Решил поднять сеть и вуаля: Танец из клубов нулевых — вероятнее всего, hakken / hakkûh, по-русски часто «хаккен» или «хакка». Это быстрые повторяющиеся переступания, выбросы и «рубящие» движения ногами под hardcore/gabber: выглядит как бег на месте, пинки по воздуху или попытка растоптать пол. Он возник в нидерландской габбер-сцене 1990-х и был связан с очень быстрым хардкор-техно. В 2000-е его и родственные дви

7💋1🙏1

7 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC219 views16 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @slava_bershVideo

Класс СЕРЖ ГАББА К такому я ещё не притрагивался😁🔥

🤷‍♀4😍4👀3❤‍🔥2🙈21

7 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC292 views8 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Блин, я конечно все понимаю , тренды и все такое. Но…… чет как то больше на избиение диких собак похоже в лютом угаре 🤣 P.s. ноль претензий к танцору ( так тоже нужно суметь ) , никакого хейта. Даже не к танцору тут мое мнение. Просто мой язык еле поворачивается назвать это танцем ( простите если кого-то цепляют мои слова). Это Просто мое отношение к увиденному. Но практически уверен, что это тот самый тренд у нас ,

4🤣3❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC339 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @volgachampVideo

«Тренироваться больше даже если сил нет» Маша здесь делится

8💯1

2 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC329 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Сегодня прям классный состав жюри был😍: Влад Туйнов, Валерия Клычкова, Заместитель Мэра ( простите не помню имени ) , Балашова (супруга очень давнего и хорошего моего товарища) и известная фигура в мире юмора. Интересный Факт - с Владом теоретически знакомы давно, хотя обстоятельства знакомства мы с ним никогда не обсуждали ибо оно было ну прям оооочень специфичным. Сейчас именно на КВН всегда с ним встречаемся и си

7❤‍🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC284 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Пожать руку Клычкову - DONE✅😁

6

2 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC288 viewsread 19 August 2026

Ну тут прям сегодня серьезная движуха . Конгресс-холл , КВН Кубок Чемпионов 🤟🔥Как думаете рассмешат ?😁

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sergecoreLIFE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГОРОД ОРЁЛ 🦅
@gorodorel57 · 101,874
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SergeCore Life” (@sergecoreLIFE), 514 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sergecoreLIFE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.