Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for .

Channel

.

@serdsemy

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2subscribers

-13,789 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004471557908
TypeChannel
Username@serdsemy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/serdsemy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@serdsemy was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@abadiylikmi
held 12 August 2026 – 28 September 2026

Growth

127,34013,670.512 August 2026 — 13,791 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,619 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,887 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,906 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,783 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,731 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,233 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,515 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,329 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,638 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,405 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,401 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,856 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,523 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,611 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,774 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,481 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,069 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,111 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,183 subscribers19 September 2026 — 27,340 subscribers26 September 2026 — 24,675 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1 subscribers4 October 2026 — 23,378 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,887 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,643 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,432 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,265 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,392 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,400 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,550 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,487 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,348 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,325 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,259 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,279 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,256 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,377 subscribers27 October 2026 — 22,338 subscribers28 October 2026 — 22,468 subscribers29 October 2026 — 22,474 subscribers30 October 2026 — 22,493 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,457 subscribers1 November 2026 — 22,445 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,325 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,130 subscribers4 November 2026 — 22,073 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,893 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,708 subscribers7 November 2026 — 2 subscribers212 August 20267 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 87 days, net -13,789. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 16:052-21,706
6 Nov 2026, 14:3121,708-185
5 Nov 2026, 14:1521,893-180
4 Nov 2026, 13:0822,073-57
3 Nov 2026, 15:2622,130-195
2 Nov 2026, 13:0622,325-120
1 Nov 2026, 14:2822,445-12
31 Oct 2026, 14:5622,457-36
30 Oct 2026, 11:4022,493+19
29 Oct 2026, 10:3022,474+6
28 Oct 2026, 06:1922,468+130
27 Oct 2026, 09:3722,338-39
26 Oct 2026, 08:4022,377+121
25 Oct 2026, 05:1822,256-23
24 Oct 2026, 04:2022,279+20
23 Oct 2026, 04:2722,259-66
22 Oct 2026, 00:5022,325-23
20 Oct 2026, 18:0822,348-139
19 Oct 2026, 14:1022,487-63
18 Oct 2026, 13:5822,550first reading

Engagement

172 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
581490.6%
avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,600
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.677%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 172 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held172 (1 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total616,380
Reactions total4,094
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 53s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

30,420 reactions across 142 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528986238955291915412,28940.4%
❤8,08326.6%
custom 52558135595725080655,01816.5%
custom 52018754103542040311,9386.37%
custom 59134484550359493341,7605.79%
🕊5861.93%
custom 53551250919255195783811.25%
❤‍🔥3651.20%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
972
across the posts below
Posts paid on
103
of 172 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
202
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serdsemy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 172 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (1.89%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,650 viewsread 5 November 2026
Voice message

Бунчалар тез сўнди ишқимизнинг чўғи...🥹💔

4 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC257 viewsread 4 November 2026

Кушилган хаммани метка кламан😁

Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @serdsemy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 17 posts on @serdsemy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
21 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.” (@serdsemy), 2 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serdsemy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.