Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐁𝐒 закрыт.

@serbbs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

390subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002407571380
TypeChannel
Username@serbbs
Created11 March 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/serbbs

Growth

390391390.58 Aug 2026, 02:19 — 391 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:02 — 391 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:42 — 390 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:198 Aug 2026, 09:42
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 390–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:42390-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:02391no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:19391first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 11 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.8%
avg views ÷ 390 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (11 March 20257 August 2026)
Views total237
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53799341673519704774423.9%
custom 53774036714054134393519.0%
custom 52017207314019974102915.8%
custom 54339863951966437992714.7%
custom 5238181937138389889179.24%
custom 5377821919615667282158.15%
custom 541588153179101738273.80%
custom 543154008490405611463.26%
custom 530577631712644355631.63%
custom 524699895524126197710.543%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC237 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

завтра будет 30.

custom 52381819371383898892custom 54315400849040561142custom 52469989552412619771custom 53057763171264435561custom 54158815317910173821

Signed Sandler

28 May 2025, 13:19 UTC≈6,920 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 🤍 🤍𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐓 ✅ 🤍𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 ✅ 🤍𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐄𝐒 ✅ 🤍𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐒𝐓 ✅ 🤍𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐓 ✅

custom 537993416735197047722custom 543398639519664379917custom 537740367140541343916custom 52017207314019974107custom 52381819371383898896custom 53778219196156672826custom 53057763171264435562custom 54158815317910173822

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐄𝐒 рест

28 May 2025, 13:17 UTC≈6,050 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍 𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 🤍 @G7sles – owner ✔️

custom 537993416735197047715custom 520172073140199741010custom 53774036714054134398custom 54339863951966437996custom 52381819371383898895custom 53778219196156672824custom 54158815317910173822custom 54315400849040561142

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐄𝐒 рест

28 May 2025, 13:16 UTC≈5,100 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍 𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐓 🤍 14.09.2024 название 𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐁𝐒 принадлежит данной конференции

custom 520172073140199741012custom 537740367140541343911custom 53799341673519704777custom 53778219196156672825custom 52381819371383898894custom 54339863951966437994custom 54158815317910173822custom 54315400849040561142

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐄𝐒 рест

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @serbbs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 701,598 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐁𝐒 закрыт.” (@serbbs), 390 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serbbs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.