Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

sepezho.log

@sepezho_log

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

622subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001864216864
TypeChannel
Username@sepezho_log
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sepezho_log

Growth

622625623.56 August 2026 — 625 subscribers6 August 2026 — 625 subscribers13 August 2026 — 622 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 622–625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:37622-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:33625no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:04625first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 6 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5339.8%
2619.5%
🔥2317.3%
🍌53.76%
🌚43.01%
🤪32.26%
🥰32.26%
🍓21.50%
👌21.50%
💊21.50%
😢21.50%
🙉21.50%
🙏21.50%
💩10.752%
🕊10.752%
😈10.752%
🤮10.752%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 14 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sepezho_log. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2026 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 May 2026, 15:47 UTC802 views10 reactions8 Starsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/-X6YzlY_8tM?si=kpqG3zbaBW9c6z5_ афигенно! гениально! илон разгрузится в ретейл и заберет ликвидность из пенсионных накоплений целой страны прям на самом пике пузыря! это выглядит настолько хорошо и гениально что похоже на сюжет фильма. хотя нет не так, даже в фильмах до такого не додумались бы! в общем к чему это я. ждем рецессию в июле и возможно стоит открыть шорты вообще на все что касается ии с

7🥰3

8 May 2026, 13:57 UTC901 views22 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вышел из дома и за пять минут оказался на пражском эфир хакатоне

🔥164👍2

4 May 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,040 views14 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

не удивлюсь если один из шагов мтонг-и будет запуск тгбтс который они хотели запустить год назад и переносили раза четыре. и в конце концов залили софт обнову на валики в маиннет, но потом в последний момент по мистической причине решили не запускать и отложить запуск (когда уже написали весь софт залили в маиннет и осталось просто включить рубильник!) думаю что еще в сентябре этот план "мтонги" уже был сформирован

10🔥4

26 Apr 2026, 10:17 UTC929 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍125🔥3🕊1

19 Apr 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,110 views50 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

открыл реакции

👍28🍌5🌚4🤪3🍓2💊2🙉2🙏2

19 Apr 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,080 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

после хака rsETH все люди вывели бабки из aave, в итоге у них на 3B usdt supplied НО ликвидности всего 4к т.е. в протоколе лежит 3ярда на бумаге и три ярда занято на бумаге. по факту на контракте лежит всего 4к долл все очень сильно хотят вывести деньги из аве но на ск закончились токены. на какое-то время там застряло три ярда юзеров. теперь люди (и вероятно боты) ловят моменты когда кто-то репеит долг чтоб пойма

👍11👌2😢2😈1

13 Apr 2026, 11:53 UTC831 viewsread 6 August 2026

(4/4) еще из интересного иногда нет доступа к пк я с телефона могу что-то запустить или попросить. как-то раз мне нужны были скрины аппки в определенном стеййте на определенной странице на определенной ширине экрана. я с телефона ему сказал сделай такие-то скрины и от мне их отправил! просто сказка. пока ехал в машине решил вопросик в целом чем больше обкладыавешься аи агентами, тем больше учишься менеджерить их. я

13 Apr 2026, 11:36 UTC647 viewsread 6 August 2026

а тут же нет коментов, пиши тогда в наш чатик @sepezho_chat или мне в лс @sepezho

13 Apr 2026, 11:33 UTC653 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

(2/4) последнние несколько месяцев много балуюсь с клавдботом и аи в целом. поставил себе макмини дома, поставил на него клавдбот. подключил антропик подписку и тд. больше всего я боялся за безопасность. но в итоге узнал что можно просто ничего ему не давать, не создавать почту не давать доступ на личный тг и тд. засетапил его очень ограничено с ремоут конектом через на машину чтоб смотреть че там происходит с пк + о

13 Apr 2026, 11:33 UTC670 viewsread 6 August 2026

(3/4) сначала я не понимал зачем делать сабагентов если это одна и та же модель аи. а потом понял когда поднял клавдбота своего. рассказываю - у любой модельки есть контекст окно. где-то оно 100к токенов где-то 200 где-то лям. чем больше контекста тем дороже каждый запрос. плюс есть лимиты после которых он начинает сжимать контекст и галлюцинировать. так вот поднимая сабагентов (я пока ограничился 5 саб-агентами) ты

13 Apr 2026, 11:33 UTC593 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(1/4) пикчи самплы. первое это полик бот второе это дашборд агентов (обрезал чтоб не показывать их контекст с их тасками, там ниже текст от них)

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sepezho_log. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 594,334 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

EVAA
@evaaprotocol · 274,195
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sepezho.log” (@sepezho_log), 622 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sepezho_log.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.