Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SeoStory

@seostory

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

462subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065556906
TypeChannel
Username@seostory
DescriptionДелюсь опытом продвижения своих сайтов финансовой тематики под США от 0 до 340К+. Тестирую то, о чем говорят сео-гуру, проверяю и делаю заметки об эффективности.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/seostory

Growth

4626 Aug 2026, 17:18 — 462 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:03 — 462 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:186 Aug 2026, 19:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 461–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:03462no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:18462first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.5%
avg views ÷ 462 subscribers
Avg views / post
293
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (12 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,104
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
236
Videos
1
Links
133

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4260.9%
😁1724.6%
🔥68.70%
😱45.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seostory. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Палю тему как индусы / пакистанцы делают DR70 Анализировал один сайт конкурента и случайно нашёл пачку ссылающихся доменов *.shop с ДР70. Да, у нас в беклинках тоже есть такой спам от ТГ-продвигаторов, думаю сейчас нет ни одного сайта, где бы в бэклинках не было бы такого мусора от спамеров или конкурентов (проверили свою сеть ПБН бекордеров - если раньше было реальных 60 сайтов, то сейчас по 450-600 спамных нофолло

🔥2

Signed Isurio

4 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC174 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Где можно посмотреть страницы, которые больше всего просматривались АИ краулерами? В Клаудфлер есть закладка AI Crawl Control - Metrics, в которой есть таблица по страницам. Если разрешить доступ на сайт только полезным АИ ботам (тут писал о настройках - https://t.me/seostory/482), тогда это будут страницы, которые краулеры отдают юзерам при рекомендациях и поиске.

🔥1

Signed Isurio

31 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC243 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда мы просто сёрфим АИ Овервью или мучаем Чаты/Перплексити за 20 баксов вместе с миллиардом индусов и пакистанских сео экспертов за бесплатно, мы не видим обратную сторону этой няшки... На фото один из тысяч АИ дата центров в США, чтобы индус написал в бесплатной версии запрос: "мейк ми супер артикл". Проблема в том, что количество юзеров АИ растет, компаниям нужно ещё больше мощностей, но вот суды США и Европы

👍3

Signed Isurio

28 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC216 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На Медиум пришел пуш о новых статьях по теме СааС и предпринимательства. Перешёл по ссылке - заинтересовал пост "как два 20-тилетних босяка зарабатывают на аппке $500к в месяц". Короче, два парня навайбкодили ИИ-приложение изучения языков Pingo AI (25 языков). Принцип: ИИ говорит слово, ты, как попка, повторяешь 10 раз, он поправляет, если говоришь неправильно. Пока не скажешь как надо, следующего слова не будет. В

😁6

Signed Isurio

27 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC219 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Зашел на Adme, не был там 100 лет. Я его помню как сайт для рекламщиков и креатива. Тогда это был топ из топов. Я, понимаю, что на каждый товар есть покупатель, но... бля. Кто эти 12М идиотов в месяц, которые такое читают? На скрине - главная страница с топ-статьями. Не раздел, а главная 🤦

😱3😁2🔥1

Signed Isurio

27 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC226 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍7😱1

Signed Isurio

24 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC248 viewsread 6 August 2026

Лайфхак по Ютюб Премиум. Просто удивляюсь как люди смотрят без премиума: ни скачать видео, ни оффлайн список треков Ютюб мюзик, ни скорость х3, отсутствие рекламы, особенно при просмотре на телевизоре. У меня был семейный план 8 лет. Часто меняли страну + члены "семьи" в разных странах. Ютюб с начала года стал жёстко контролировать семью по одному адресу и особенно страну регистрации. Т.к. живём в Европе, то Ютюб пр

Signed Isurio

24 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC247 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ютюб добавил "бубну" Джеминай по пересказу и поиску по видео. Нажимаете, он предлагает пересказ видео, ответы на вопросы из видео, потом о чем оно. Красиво. Теперь можно экономить токены на расшифровку видео. У меня Ютюб Премиум, не знаю есть в обычном или нет этой фичи.

👍3🔥2

Signed Isurio

22 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC258 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Обратил внимание, что в Гугл Аналитикс и Клаудфлер Веб Аналитикс выросла доля директ трафика и снизилась органика (2 мес), но общий трафик остался на условном уровне. Начал разбираться, оказывается Гугл АИ Овервью и Чаты (десктоп) остались в органике (но не факт), а все мобильные переходы с Чатов и мобильных приложений перешли в директ. Из-за GDPR переходы из мобильных приложений чата гпт, клода, перплексити, джеми

👍8

Signed Isurio

18 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC286 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кто не знал, в Chat GPT есть режимы общения, предустановленный Default - льстит, восхищается, обманывает - делает все, чтобы тебе понравилось по-дольше общаться и говорит то, что ты хотел бы услышать, но... эта хрень не пригодна для работы. Чтобы получить более-менее реальную картину я ставлю Candid, иногда Efficient (если нужны ответы короче и четче). Запускаете чат и понимаете, что вы, ваш продукт и ваша компания

👍3

Signed Isurio

18 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC262 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Перенастроили Клаудфлер под АИ ботов: 1) поставили АИ Лабиринт тренинговым АИ ботам 2) в настройках оставили разрешение доступа всем АИ ботам (основная настройка Клауда, которая автоматом все треннинговые боты и Гугл ботов блокирует) 3) отключили - "Бот файт мод" (авторежим блокирования ботов - он блокирует оказалось Перплексити и Клод - их боты тупые) 4) заблокировали в настройках АИ клаулеры (тренинговые) и ос

Signed Isurio

17 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC248 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тот случай, когда отзывы клиентов на сайт сеошникам делал бесплатный ИИ рукожоп. 😂

😁9

Signed Isurio

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @seostory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 442,384 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SeoStory” (@seostory), 462 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seostory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.