Channel
@seoproduct
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
304subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001709909914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seoproduct |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seoproduct |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 304 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 304 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 December 2025 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 115 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 41.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 8.33% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Китайцы догнали американцев — уровень Kimi K3 где-то между Claude Opus 4.8 и Fable 5 В воскресенье на странице Moonshot AI в X появилось сообщение: «За последние 48 часов рост спроса заставил нас приблизиться к пределу существующих мощностей. Наши GPU ощущают это». Компания временно приостановила предоставление [платного] доступа к своим ИИ-моделям для новых подписчиков. Moonshot AI 27 июля планирует раскрыть информ…
На заметку. Китайский MiniMax c флагманской моделью MiniMax M3. Не Fable, конечно, а где-то уровень Opus 4.6 (рабочая лошадка)
👏1
Bing начал выкатывать обновление отчета AI Performance: в нем появились интенты, темы, кол-во цитирований и доля цитирований.
🔥3
Суд Мюнхена завершил рассмотрение дела о фейковой выдаче в разделе AI Overview при использовании поисковой системы Google. Компанию признали виновной в распространении заведомо ложной информации. Разбирательство началось после того, как AI Overview причислил два немецких издательства к нечестным компаниям, которые обманывают своих клиентов и используют манипуляции для получения выгоды. При этом сайты, на которые ссы…
👍4
КО: Картинка снижения влияния ПФ попутно с ростом Антифрода за последнее время. pf.bar / ТГ
👍2
В Алисе (alice.yandex.ru) появился режим "Исследовать", визуально агрегирует порядка 150 источников. В узких темах за счет базы Яндекса получаются интересные ресерчи, например, для "быстрый ужин" понимает, что срок приготовления должен быть менее 30 минут, а ингредиенты доступны в российских магазинах
Обновление Google Trends - справа опорные запросы потенциальных кластеров от Gemini (работает без VPN)
Гуглоиды заявили об обновлении страницы "Trends Explore": "Мы переосмыслили страницу Trends Explore, чтобы журналистам, создателям контента, исследователям и всем, кто интересуется поисковыми трендами, было еще проще находить полезную информацию, вдохновляться и глубже изучать интересующие их темы. При изучении какой-либо темы в разделе «Тренды» часто возникает необходимость сравнить данные по связанным запросам, что…
Предпразднично-учебное... N8N-автоматизации в SEO (Perplexity)
🔥4
Запросы с вхождением "алиса" в Я.Метрике. ПС. Отфильтруются также запросы, содержащие "алиса" в качестве части слов ~(алиса)( [^ ]*){2,}$
✍1🔥1
Для использования в Я.Метрике надо поменять "^" (в начале регулярного выражения) на "~". В основном попадаются обычные инфо-запросы "как" / "что", из нейро-запросов — паттерны типа "алиса покажи ...", "алиса подскажи ...", "алиса скажи ...", "алиса привет ...". ПС. О фильтрации в Я.Метрике по AI-источникам
Адаптированный вариант для русскоязычных запросов — порог длины снижен от 5 слов, общая длина регулярки не должна превышать 3500 символов, добавлять в Google Search Console ("Эффективность"->"Результаты поиска"->"Добавить фильтр"->"Запрос"->"Специальные запросы (регулярные выражения)"). Правда, в выборку попадают в основном обычные информационные запросы. ^(напиши|создай|сделай|придумай|сгенерируй|составь|подготовь|р…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @seoproduct. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продуктовое SEO” (@seoproduct), 304 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seoproduct.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.