Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93–95 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 04:40
93
-1
14 Aug 2026, 18:18
94
-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:46
95
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:26
95
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11
36.7%
❤
6
20.0%
😍
6
20.0%
👏
1
3.33%
🔥
1
3.33%
😁
1
3.33%
😘
1
3.33%
🤔
1
3.33%
🤨
1
3.33%
🥴
1
3.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2021 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه تجربهای از قطعی اینترنت قبلی دارم که گفتم شاید به دردتون بخوره ✋
وقتی اینترنت قطع شد، خیلی از سایتایی که هاستشون ایران بود، از خارج کشور بالا نمیاومدن. گوگل هم نمیتونست ببینتشون. کاربرای خارجی هم عملاً هیچی.
از اون طرف هاستهای خارجی هم برای ما که داخل ایران بودیم باز نمیشد.
اکثر شرکتهای هاستینگ راه حلشون این بود که بگن دو تا هاست بخر، یکی داخل یکی خارج، بعدم پول GeoDNS رو جدا بدی تا درست بشه. 😕
با کلی در…
🚨 تجربهی تلخ هک شدن گوشی خودم
تو این روزا که اینترنت قطع بود، برنامههامون آپدیت نبود و همهمون دنبال یه VPN یا راهی برای وصل شدن میگشتیم، بنده رسماً به نمایندگی از همه دوستان هک شدم!
میخوام تجربهام رو باهاتون به اشتراک بذارم، شاید جلوی هک شدن شما گرفته بشه.
🔹 ماجرا از این قرار بود که چند روز پیش یکی از VPNهایی که تو گروهها معروف شده بود (ویپیان شیر و خورشید) رو از یه کانال دانلود و نصب کردم.
چند دقیقه بعد ا…
بالاخره اینترنت باز شد و من اومدم اپلیکیشنهام رو آپدیت کنم که یه چیز عجیب و غریب توی نرم افزار F-Droid دیدم، یه خبری هست که اگه اندرویدی باشی، واقعاً اعصابت رو خورد میکنه 😕
گوگل یه قانون جدید گذاشته که از شهریور ۱۴۰۵ اجرایی میشه. خلاصهش اینه: دیگه نمیتونی هر برنامهای رو راحت رو گوشیت نصب کنی. آره، همون اوپن سورسی که عاشقش بودیم داره از بین میره.
حتی اگه یه دانشجو یه برنامه ساده واسه خودش بنویسه، یا به پروژه اوپ…
حالا فرض کن تو نتیجه دهم سایت تو رو ببینه من باشم احتمالا به دلایل زیر کلیک میکنم:
✔ عکس فوآیکون جذابه
✔ موضوع تایتل مرتبطه
✔ ۵ ستاره ای داره
و به دلایل زیر کلیک نمیکنم:
❌ چرا وقتی جای دیگه ویدئو هست من باید یه کتاب طولانی بخونم
❌ بغل فوآیکون اسم برند نداره
❌ دسکریپشنش جذاب نیست واسم
❌ من اینا رو نمیشناسم اصلا هیچ جا نیستن از کجا بهشون اعتماد کنم میرم مقاله سایت های معروف رو میخونم
چند نمونه از پلاگینهایی که همچین کاری میتونن بکنن:
https://wordpress.org/plugins/block-visibility/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/iq-block-country/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/ip2location-country-blocker/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seoforum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش سئو با مجید عابد (SEO Forum Academy سابق)” (@seoforum), 93 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seoforum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.