Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 50 days, net +635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,877–7,703 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:37
7,607
+20
17 Sept 2026, 06:55
7,587
-16
13 Sept 2026, 09:17
7,603
-5
9 Sept 2026, 13:56
7,608
+8
4 Sept 2026, 14:14
7,600
+31
1 Sept 2026, 02:05
7,569
+16
29 Aug 2026, 08:53
7,553
+17
26 Aug 2026, 06:35
7,536
+2
23 Aug 2026, 13:16
7,534
+17
20 Aug 2026, 10:23
7,517
+197
17 Aug 2026, 17:25
7,320
+268
14 Aug 2026, 04:57
7,052
+28
10 Aug 2026, 15:45
7,024
+32
7 Aug 2026, 23:43
6,992
+20
7 Aug 2026, 08:47
6,972
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
708 reactions across 25 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
261
36.9%
❤
202
28.5%
👍
184
26.0%
😁
29
4.10%
😱
12
1.69%
🎉
7
0.989%
😢
6
0.847%
👏
3
0.424%
🥰
3
0.424%
🙏
1
0.141%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 25 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seoetc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вторая часть поста про ниши, которые сильнее всего повлияли на мой опыт
В первой были игры и финансы. Теперь переходим к двум направлениям, после которых мои представления о SEO очень сильно поменялись 👇
💱 Крипта
В крипту я зашёл с двух ног.
Логика была примерно такая: ну я же в финансах разбираюсь, в крипте наверняка будет попроще, это же более узкое направление.
Крипта полностью разорвала все шаблоны. Один из …
Ниши, в которые я боялся заходить — и что из этого вышло
За всё время работы у меня было несколько ниш, которые особенно сильно повлияли на мой опыт. Начну с первых двух 👇
🎮 Игры
Самая первая ниша, в которую я ещё будучи абсолютным профаном заходил со стороны SEO и немного маркетинга.
Поначалу это было очень фаново. В те годы единицы понимали, как всё работает: не было огромных монополистов, такого количества рег…
Мне всё не нравится. Трезвая критика как точка роста
Одна из фундаментальных мыслей, которые помогают мне оценивать любой процесс и понимать, нужна ли его доработка, — подходить к нему с точки зрения: «Мне не нравится, как это работает».
Я изначально предполагаю, что это работает плохо, и начинаю глубже вникать, чтобы уже потом сделать выводы.
1️⃣ Нельзя делать это с наскока
Нужно чётко вникнуть в задачу, трезво …
Уже сегодня выступаю на AI SEO Day 2026 🔔
Поговорим о том:
🔺 Как AI использует брендовые сигналы помимо ссылок
🔺 Почему упоминания, цитирования и рекомендации становятся факторами доверия
🔺 Как меняется роль классических ссылочных факторов
🔺 Что происходит с экономикой Digital PR и линкбилдинга
🔺 Как получать брендовые упоминания без переплат за размещение
Конференция будет полезна всем, кто работает или хотя бы м…
В последнее время я всё чаще возвращаюсь к одному вопросу: что будет определять видимость бренда, если пользователь всё чаще получает ответ сразу от ИИ, а не переходит по привычной поисковой выдаче?
Как раз об этом будем говорить 19 августа на AI SEO Day 2026 🚀
Это большая онлайн-конференция про AI Search, GEO и то, как нейросети уже меняют привычный SEO-подход.
🎤 В программе — сильные и известные специалисты из и…
Вопрос ко всем, у кого есть свои клиенты 👇
Представим простую ситуацию.
Вы оказываете услуги своим клиентам — например, у вас SMM-агентство, маркетинговая команда или вы работаете как отдельный специалист.
К вам приходит другое агентство из смежного направления — например, SEO или линкбилдинг — и предлагает запартнёриться: передавать друг другу клиентов, дополнять услуги друг друга и вместе зарабатывать на сотрудн…
🤷 В принципе не интересен такой формат сотрудничества9%
👀 Просто посмотреть результаты опроса40%
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ищем подрядчиков и открыты к сотрудничеству 🔔
Мы активно развиваемся, и сейчас у нас есть желание двигаться по многим направлениям. К сотрудничеству мы открыты постоянно, но периодически хотим напоминать об этом публично.
🤝 Коллаборации и совместные проекты
Мы готовы рассматривать самые разные предложения. Абсолютно не стесняйтесь нам писать: мы честно ответим, готовы ли к сотрудничеству и можем ли сейчас его реал…
Самая большая проблема овнера 🧠
Как по мне, это входящий поток информации, который приходит абсолютно из любых источников:
идеи, фишки, курсы, исследования и предложения от команды. Ты увидел что-то полезное — понимаешь, что это нужно изучить. Кто-то подкинул классную мысль, ты закинул её в ChatGPT или Claude на глубокое исследование и получил ещё десятки или сотни вариаций.
Из всей этой информации нужно вычленить…
Как я потерял свои первые 100 000 долларов 💸
🧾 $1 050 — закупка лимитов на сервисах наперёд: «Ведь мы скоро расширимся в разы»
🎓 $1 500 — на консультациях у инфоцыган и псевдоэкспертов
🤝 $2 900 — на кешбэке клиентам, когда ситуация того точно не требовала. Стоило пойти в суд или в целом сильнее отстаивать свою позицию, но мы переволновались за «репутацию», хотя в тех случаях были точно правы
👻 $5 600 — на заказах…
Я сексист? 🤔
Было это ещё на заре нашей компании, когда мы только начинали работу.
В какой-то момент я заметил одну девушку, которая работала заметно лучше остальных. Во-первых, она была очень системной. Во-вторых, более внимательной. В-третьих, гибче реагировала на все правки, корректировки и замечания. В целом подходила к своей работе очень качественно и ответственно.
И моего тогдашнего опыта понимания людей и р…
🔥28❤18😁13👍6
Signed Евгений Саргош
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @seoetc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤷 В принципе не интересен такой формат сотрудничества9%
👀 Просто посмотреть результаты опроса40%
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SEO HR, digital-вакансии, офис и удалёнка @seohr · 24,951 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
R2B.News @reg2bet · 25,380 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Евгений Саргош | Phoenix Project” (@seoetc), 7,607 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seoetc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.