Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Евгений Саргош | Phoenix Project

Channel

Евгений Саргош | Phoenix Project

@seoetc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,739subscribers

+767 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001820444835
TypeChannel
Username@seoetc
DescriptionЕвгений Саргош о системном маркетинге и привлечении клиентов. Кейсы агентства, рост трафика и лидов, управление командами. Заказать услуги: @SalesPhoenix Сотрудничество: @PRPhoenixProject — Отзывы: @evhensarhoshreviews
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/seoetc

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9727,7437,357.57 August 2026 — 6,972 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,992 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,024 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,052 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,320 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,517 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,534 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,536 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,553 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,569 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,600 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,608 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,603 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,587 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,607 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,626 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,688 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,716 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,725 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,727 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,743 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,734 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,732 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,733 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,726 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,731 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,739 subscribers7,7397 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +767. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,856–7,859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:557,739+8
7 Nov 2026, 09:287,731+5
4 Nov 2026, 12:457,726-7
1 Nov 2026, 21:367,733+1
29 Oct 2026, 11:267,732-2
26 Oct 2026, 11:067,734-9
23 Oct 2026, 03:047,743+16
20 Oct 2026, 11:567,727+2
17 Oct 2026, 18:017,725+9
15 Oct 2026, 03:567,716+28
11 Oct 2026, 16:177,688+62
5 Oct 2026, 02:207,626+19
26 Sept 2026, 08:377,607+20
17 Sept 2026, 06:557,587-16
13 Sept 2026, 09:177,603-5
9 Sept 2026, 13:567,608+8
4 Sept 2026, 14:147,600+31
1 Sept 2026, 02:057,569+16
29 Aug 2026, 08:537,553+17
26 Aug 2026, 06:357,536first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 7,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held50 (18 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total21,988
Reactions total446
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
249
Videos
11
Links
348

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,359 reactions across 46 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥55340.7%
❤38028.0%
👍34125.1%
😁372.72%
😱120.883%
👏110.809%
😢90.662%
🎉70.515%
🥰40.294%
💯30.221%
👌10.074%
🙏10.074%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 48 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seoetc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC452 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

11.11 в Phoenix Project: запускаем неделю бонусов 🎁 С 11 по 15 ноября заказывайте услуги Phoenix Project и получайте не только результат от продвижения, но и дополнительные бонусы. Как всё работает? За каждые полные $100 оплаченного заказа начисляем 1 фишку. Накопленные фишки можно обменять на бонусы в специальном магазине или потратить на сундуки. Например: 🔹 3 фишки — кэшбэк $25 на следующий заказ 🔹 10 фишек —…

❤6👍4🔥3😁2

Signed Евгений Саргош

6 Nov 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,050 views19 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

А вдруг вашему проекту вообще не нужен большой линкбилдинг? 😳 О чём это я? Давайте объясню на одном из наших кейсов. 🇺🇦 К нам пришло event-агентство из Украины. Локальный сервисный бизнес, конкретное ГЕО и понятная задача: усилить ссылочный профиль, поддержать органику и посмотреть, как сайт отреагирует на внешнее продвижение. Никакой многомесячной кампании здесь не было. Мы выбрали разовый пакет и всего два форм…

👍11❤5🔥2😁1

Signed Евгений Саргош

5 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC929 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026

📝 Чек-лист: 7 пунктов для качественного линкбилдинга в 2027 году Последние дни мы очень много говорили о том, что в линкбилдинге может пойти не так. А сейчас предлагаю сейчас проверить свой проект. Открывайте ссылочную стратегию, отчёты подрядчика или Ahrefs — и честно отвечайте на 7 вопросов: 1️⃣ Понимаете ли вы, зачем покупается каждая группа ссылок? Не просто: «в этом месяце закупили 30». А зачем именно эти 3…

❤6👍5🔥3🥰1

Signed Евгений Саргош

4 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,080 views35 reactionsread 12 November 2026

💭 Можно ли прогнозировать результат линкбилдинга? Один из самых частых вопросов, который мне задают клиенты: «Евгений, вот мы вложим деньги в ссылки. А когда будет результат и какой?» Вас должно насторожить, если подрядчик сразу отвечает: «Через 3 месяца будете в ТОП-3, не волнуйтесь» Так линкбилдинг не работает. К сожалению. Но это не значит, что прогнозировать вообще ничего нельзя. Можно. Просто прогноз долж…

🔥21👍9❤4👌1

Signed Евгений Саргош

3 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,040 views24 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

5 ошибка, которая съест ваш бюджет в линкбилдинге в 2027 году С этой ошибкой очень легко жить месяцами и даже не замечать её. Представьте: — ссылки закупаются — размещения выходят — отчёты приходят вовремя — RD растёт Вроде бы всё работает как надо. Но проходит месяц. Потом второй... 🤯 Одна группа страниц уже хорошо двигается. Другая стоит почти на тех же позициях. В одном ГЕО всё идёт нормально, в другом резуль…

🔥13❤7👍4

Signed Евгений Саргош

2 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC937 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026

4 из 5 ошибок в линкбилдинге: Одинаковая стратегия в разных ГЕО 🌍 Наверняка вы хоть раз задумывались: «Вот здесь стратегия сработала. Значит, просто повторим её в другой стране» Так делать нельзя. Ведь у каждой страны свои уникальные: — конкуренты — доступные доноры — стоимость размещений — язык — локальные площадки — страницы, которые вообще имеет смысл усиливать НЕЛЬЗЯ просто взять и сделать одну англоязычную …

❤12👍6🔥4😢1

Signed Евгений Саргош

31 Oct 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,090 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Как приятно получать вашу обратную связь 👍 После вчерашнего кейса мне в личку уже прилетел фидбек. И, честно, это очень ценно и важно для нас. Мы старались сделать статью не просто полотном текста с расплывчатыми фактами. Перед написанием мы прошлись по специалистам, которые вели проект, и подробно собрали: — с какой задачей к нам пришёл клиент — почему проект был непростым — как команда распределяла ссылочный бюд…

❤8👍5🔥1😢1

Signed Евгений Саргош

30 Oct 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,210 views21 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Как в 5,6 раз увеличить органику для молодого сайта — за 3 месяца руками агентства 📈 Показываю обещанный кейс, где мы работали с молодым финансовым проектом для рынка США. За 3 месяца мы пришли к таким результатам: 🔥 1 442 → 8 047 органических визитов — рост почти в 6 раз 🔥 ТОП-10: 430 → 1 375 запросов 🔥 ТОП-3: 28 → 447 запросов 🔥 374 → 1 002 ссылающихся домена Чтобы узнать, как всё было в подробностях, читайте с…

👍9❤5🔥4😁3

Signed Phoenix Project

27 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,360 views38 reactionsread 12 November 2026

3 из 5 ошибок в линкбилдинге, на которую вы сливаете свои деньги Продолжим тему из прошлого поста. Допустим, вы нашли конкурента, который стабильно растёт. Открыли Ahrefs, посмотрели его ссылки — всё идеально. И дальше возникает мысль: «Ну вот же рабочая стратегия. Давайте сделаем так же, чтобы точно выйти в плюс» СТОП ✋ Да, вы видите красивый результат, но вы не видите, как, когда и откуда этот сайт к нему приш…

🔥28❤9👍1

Signed Евгений Саргош

26 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,240 views20 reactionsread 12 November 2026

⚡️ ТАКИЕ метрики портят вашу ссылочную стратегию (ошибка 2 из 5) Представим ситуацию. Вы нашли площадку. DR — 70+. Трафик есть. Цена выглядит вполне адекватно. На первый взгляд всё отлично, можно брать. А потом смотрите чуть внимательнее — и выясняется, что трафик вообще не из вашего ГЕО, нужная страница почти не посещается, исходящих ссылок там уже сотни. И вот за такую ссылку вы заплатили деньги 🫥 В Ahrefs она…

👍13❤5🔥2

Signed Евгений Саргош

23 Oct 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,290 views48 reactionsread 12 November 2026

1 из 5 главных ошибок, которые съедают ваш бюджет в линкбилдинге 📉 Начнём с той, которую я вижу постоянно. Приходят клиенты и говорят: «Мы хотим быстрый рост. Значит, давайте закупим больше ссылок» Допустим, мы закупаем больше ссылок. Что происходит дальше? Бюджет увеличили, ссылок стало в два раза больше, а позиции почти не двинулись. Часть ссылок ушла на страницы, которым усиление сейчас вообще не было нужно. Час…

🔥33❤6👏5👍3😢1

Signed Евгений Саргош

22 Oct 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,440 views61 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

Линкбилдинг в 2027 году — как дальше работать с ссылками, чтобы быть в ТОПе? Владея агентством, я очень хорошо вижу, какие изменения происходят в этой сфере. Типичная ситуация: Количество ссылок растёт. Бюджет уходит. Потом начинается классика: «Почему позиции стоят?» «Почему у конкурента это сработало, а у нас нет?» «Почему один рынок растёт, а другой вообще не двигается?» Таких вопросов будет становиться тольк…

❤51🔥8👍2

Signed Евгений Саргош

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @seoetc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTCAnonymous Poll132 voters

А какого контента в канале вам хотелось бы видеть больше? Что вам интереснее читать?

  1. Больше новостей13%
  2. Больше экспертных лонгридов55%
  3. Больше коротких постов15%
  4. Больше кейсов61%
  5. Больше личных историй14%
  6. Больше картинок и юмора11%

The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Oct 2026, 13:25 UTCAnonymous Poll186 voters

Кто ты, Воин? 🗡

  1. Владелец / руководитель бизнеса19%
  2. Маркетолог12%
  3. SEO-специалист41%
  4. Линкбилдер8%
  5. Работаю в агентстве2%
  6. Фрилансер8%
  7. Другое направление10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTCAnonymous Poll138 voters

Что для вас главный ред флаг в партнёрстве?

  1. 💰 Не понимаю, в чём моя выгода18%
  2. 🫥 Боюсь обмана и отсутствия прозрачности23%
  3. 👥 Боюсь, что заберут моих клиентов20%
  4. 🤔 Не доверяю их экспертизе19%
  5. ⚠️ Если они ошибутся, проблемы будут и у меня24%
  6. 🫠 Не хочу добавлять себе лишнюю операционку13%
  7. 🤷 В принципе не интересен такой формат сотрудничества9%
  8. 👀 Просто посмотреть результаты опроса40%

The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SEO HR, digital-вакансии, офис и удалёнка
@seohr · 25,209
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
R2B
@reg2bet · 26,360
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Евгений Саргош | Phoenix Project” (@seoetc), 7,739 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seoetc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.