Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ÆQUITAS VERITAS

@sensusveritas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

229subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658060992
TypeChannel
Username@sensusveritas
Created28 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sensusveritas

Growth

2298 Aug 2026, 00:30 — 229 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:16 — 229 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:308 Aug 2026, 10:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:16229no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:30229first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 February 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
65
Videos
9
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13m 07s
Average length
6m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13546.6%
👍7024.1%
6823.4%
😁134.48%
🎉10.345%
👏10.345%
💩10.345%
😢10.345%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2022 to 18 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2022, 06:28 UTC≈2,510 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Oy vey, Eric what is you doing with your legs?

😁3

17 Apr 2022, 12:18 UTC≈2,410 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Happy Resurrection Day, to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. “I am the resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me, although he be dead, shall live: And everyone one that liveth, and believeth in me, shall not die for ever.“ John 11:25-26 DR

11👍1💩1

6 Mar 2022, 08:47 UTC≈5,610 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“There are faithful Shepherds who care for the flock of Christ, but there are also mercenary infidels who seek to scatter the flock and hand the SHEEP over to be devoured by ravenous wolves. It is not surprising that these mercenaries are allies of the children of darkness and hate the children of light” - Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò to T45 Drop 4541

👍18🔥71

24 Feb 2022, 08:23 UTC≈3,020 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

10🔥7👍5

24 Feb 2022, 08:16 UTC≈2,330 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ATROX MELIOR DULCISSIMA VERITAS MENDACIIS

👍4

19 Feb 2022, 21:12 UTC≈4,640 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥345👍2🎉1

18 Feb 2022, 10:19 UTC≈7,820 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

OH NO, Nate Salvatore Burrito aka Castelli aka QFrogman aka SpecOperator baby, who is you scammin’?

🔥20👍41👏1😢1

18 Feb 2022, 04:13 UTC≈1,220 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShellShQckPhoto

STOLEN VALOR This is serious shit. You know who you are. Brave men and women sign a blank check, willing give their life for a cause that they believe is bigger than themselves. If you masquerade as an Active duty/Veteran/Operator, and you never served in the military a day in your life, you are the scum of the earth. Active duty SEALs/MARSOC/Green Berets/Rangers/Combat controllers etc., are NOT ALLOWED social me

🔥255👍1

17 Feb 2022, 21:13 UTC≈1,070 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

35👍15🔥8

17 Feb 2022, 07:01 UTC≈1,940 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

These people really are stupid. 💀

👍19🔥6😁1

17 Feb 2022, 06:49 UTC≈1,340 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @NewSavageDawg

One thing I know. I have Never accepted money. I have never taken advantage of people. HAVE YOU?

🔥9😁5👍1

17 Feb 2022, 04:17 UTC≈2,480 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👆🏼If you had any doubts…here is further confirmation > via the Anon who originally contacted Dianna, Ryan’s wife. Anon also reached out to Spec directly. These are their responses.

🔥12

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sensusveritas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ÆQUITAS VERITAS” (@sensusveritas), 229 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sensusveritas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.