Channel
@senseofmoney
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
219subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002967338620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @senseofmoney |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/senseofmoney |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 219 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 223 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 223 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 63.7375 GRAM (115.2$) Inside cheque: 5099 activation(s) for 0.01 GRAM (0.02$) with referral reward 0.0025 GRAM (0.005$) 💬 🎮 Добавь Поигрульки в свой чат Запускай мини-игры, собирай участников и играй со своими подписчиками прямо в Telegram. Больше активности, больше общения, больше движухи в чате. @xrockgame_bot
❤3
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 63.7375 GRAM (116.0$) Inside cheque: 5099 activation(s) for 0.01 GRAM (0.02$) with referral reward 0.0025 GRAM (0.005$) 💬 🎮 Добавь Поигрульки в свой чат Запускай мини-игры, собирай участников и играй со своими подписчиками прямо в Telegram. Больше активности, больше общения, больше движухи в чате. @xrockgame_bot
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 1.65 GRAM (2.7$) Inside cheque: 110 activation(s) for 0.01 GRAM (0.02$) with referral reward 0.005 GRAM (0.008$)
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 551.25 DFC (2.6$) Inside cheque: 105 activation(s) for 3.5 DFC (0.02$) with referral reward 1.75 DFC (0.008$)
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 47.4875 GRAM (74.3$) Inside cheque: 3799 activation(s) for 0.01 GRAM (0.02$) with referral reward 0.0025 GRAM (0.004$) 💬 🎮 Добавь Поигрульки в свой чат Запускай мини-игры, собирай участников и играй со своими подписчиками прямо в Telegram. Больше активности, больше общения, больше движухи в чате. @xrockgame_bot
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 102.95 USDT (103.0$) Inside cheque: 2059 activation(s) for 0.04 USDT (0.04$) with referral reward 0.01 USDT (0.01$) 💬 💸 Do you want to make money by creating accounts? Earn $0.27 for registering each account! Do you want more? Just invite referrals and get 20% for each account of your referral created. 🚀Just launch the bot and start earning right now 👉 @Gmailfaremrv2_bot
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 10.72 USDT (10.7$) Inside cheque: 536 activation(s) for 0.02 USDT (0.02$)
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 100 USDT (100.0$) Inside cheque: 5000 activation(s) for 0.02 USDT (0.02$) 💬 Чек на 50 активаций по 1$ на стриме - https://kick.com/kush25
❤2
🎁 Join the giveaway together with me and share 🪙 5,000 USDT ($4,997.63).
❤1
🎁 Join the giveaway together with me and share 🪙 500 USDT ($499.44).
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 100 USDT (100.0$) Inside cheque: 2500 activation(s) for 0.02 USDT (0.02$) with referral reward 0.02 USDT (0.02$) 💬 BITNEST 2.0 НА СМАРТ КОНТРАКТЕ: https://t.me/twinex_bot/app?startapp=5155531271
❤1
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 78 TON (101.1$) Inside cheque: 2080 activation(s) for 0.03 TON (0.04$) with referral reward 0.0075 TON (0.010$) 💬 AI is giving away crypto here.👇 Аи разыгрывает крипту здесь👇 @wewinfree @wewinfree @wewinfree
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @senseofmoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 476,998 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Money💰” (@senseofmoney), 219 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/senseofmoney.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.