Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Keep Walking

Channel

Keep Walking

@sempror

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

279subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001893699235
TypeChannel
Username@sempror
DescriptionSemper prorsum! Тут про английский и часто на английском. Конструктивные комментарии жадно заглатываются автором. Все обсуждения — в режиме safe space. Заглушите канал, пожалуйста, чтоб я не переживал, что много пишу!
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sempror

Growth

2791 Oct 2026, 14:47 — 279 subscribers1 Oct 2026, 15:22 — 279 subscribers1 Oct 2026, 14:471 Oct 2026, 15:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 278–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 15:22279no change
1 Oct 2026, 14:47279first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
318
Videos
15
Links
320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10545.5%
❤7231.2%
👀146.06%
🔥146.06%
🥰146.06%
🤯114.76%
😐10.433%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 2 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sempror. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 November 2025 to 2 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Jan 2026, 11:48 UTC383 views9 reactions1 Starread 1 October 2026

A lovely gif-inspired comic about three chickens trying to figure out why Carol is like that. 🐔 🐓

😁4❤3🥰2

1 Jan 2026, 17:51 UTC339 views12 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

When Churchill was visiting the US in 1932 (during the 1920–1933 Prohibition), he kept a doctor’s note on hand explaining why (or rather that), due to a pre-existing condition, he had to keep drinking, particularly during meals. Apparently it helped because he was ninety when he died 33 years later.

❤8😁4

1 Jan 2026, 08:31 UTC258 views23 reactions4 Starsread 1 October 2026

Хэпёвого вам спелого первоянварского Нюера, дорогие друзья! 🎄 Верю, 2026-й станет переломным — в смысле театрального break-a-leg’а! Берегите: • Себя • Близких • Культурный код • Отчизну. Желаю вам свежих впечатлений, товарно-материальных ценностей и надежности в людях и вещах. 🎄 Сэнкс фор леттингз ми спик фром май харт.

❤15🥰6🔥2

30 Dec 2025, 14:23 UTC256 views20 reactions1 Starread 1 October 2026
Photo

Do you know who they are and who drew this? Не успел опубликовать, как @petia_nalitch угадал художника, а @aliceplus_ok — нарисованных. Да, это иллюстрация Туве Янссон к одному из первых изданий Хоббита, где еще не было указано, что Голлум небольшой. Впоследствии Толкиен (вроде как из-за этой иллюстрации) дополнил его описание, чтоб было ясно, что он не АГРОМНЫЙ P. S. I could’ve written all this in English, too, bu…

❤8🥰5🔥4👀2🤯1

25 Dec 2025, 17:40 UTC197 views16 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Once you have learned the education, it is time to obey ^_____^ 🤣

😁9👀4🔥3

25 Dec 2025, 17:35 UTC175 views11 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Why do riot police show up to work early? To beat the crowds. (I’m sorry for everything 🍊🐤🍊)

❤6😁5

29 Nov 2025, 13:22 UTC256 views9 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Thanks, Zhenya @evgeny_gorbatov 🛳️

😁7❤2

29 Nov 2025, 09:12 UTC230 views8 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Some of you may have noticed that there’s is something slightly—almost imperceptibly—off about AI-generated texts (and no, I am not talking about m-dashes, that’s a poor man’s indicator of AI). Well, I decided to test a hypothesis, and, interestingly enough, my intuition was spot on. This is what I asked DeepSeek: Hello my good whale! 🐳 Here’s something I would like to ask, please: Was there any research done on th…

❤5🔥3

28 Nov 2025, 17:14 UTC171 views9 reactionsread 1 October 2026

So here’s a peculiar coincidence indeed: JRRT died in 1973, which, if read backwards, is Three rings for the Elven-kings under the sky, Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone, Nine for Mortal Men, doomed to die, One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne. Canny? Nope, uncanny. 💍

❤3👀3🤯3

28 Nov 2025, 12:21 UTC193 views6 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Wanna try? I really like these Syllo games, and the interesting thing I’ve noticed is that I consistently rank better on more difficult words and fail (sometimes really hard) the simpler ones. This must be a consequence of the ESLship where still your vocabulary is disproportionately skewed towards bookish stuff away from everyday speech. Anyhow I really recommend this game, it’s 🆒 P. S. I would also like to use th…

🤯6

26 Nov 2025, 20:13 UTC162 views9 reactionsread 1 October 2026

A user (u/neuronexmachina) on Reddit wrote this AI prompt: Role: You are the Chief Visionary Officer and CEO of a stealth-mode startup that is "disrupting" everything. You are a Thought Leader™ with 500k followers on LinkedIn. You speak exclusively in corporate buzzwords, empty platitudes, and aggressive optimism. Your Muse: You are a mix of Kendall Roy from Succession, Russ Hanneman from Silicon Valley, and a gene…

👀4😁4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sempror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Nov 2025, 20:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz45 voters

"Penultimate" is the same as

  1. Better than best13%
  2. Just best0%
  3. Second best20%
  4. Laster than last18%
  5. Just last2%
  6. Second last42%
  7. None of the above4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 2 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KALAQ ACADEMY - TNPSC EXAMS
@kalvikaraiyila · 19,853
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Keep Walking” (@sempror), 279 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sempror.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.