Channel
@semichevmisha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,286subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001142522627 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @semichevmisha |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/semichevmisha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 1,286 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 1,287 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 1,287 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 18 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
668 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 208 | 31.1% | |
| ❤ | 146 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 137 | 20.5% | |
| 🤯 | 62 | 9.28% | |
| 🍾 | 38 | 5.69% | |
| 🏆 | 27 | 4.04% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 2.54% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 1.50% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 1.20% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.898% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.898% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.449% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 668reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @semichevmisha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 January 2025 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Спаржа - Меня обманули! Я только сейчас узнал, что «спаржа по-корейски» - это вообще не спаржа. Все это время думал, что ем овощ (зеленые стебельки), который как-то экзотично высушивают или готовят, и от него остается только клетчатка. А оказалось - это сушёная соевая пенка. Да-да… Это как та самая пенка от какао, которую никто не любит, но в промышленных масштабах. Так что мы едим не овощ, а соевый белок. Оказал…
🤯47👍12🤔5❤4🔥1
Удивительная вещь… Мне так хочется создавать посты здесь (это какой-то внутренний призыв, Я пытался его не слушать, и чем меньше его слушаю, тем больше он кричит). Но каждый год, вписываюсь в какую-то сумасшедшую авантюру и все… этот канал замирает. С лирикой закончил. Теперь к делу. Продолжаю выкладывать посты в этом канале, когда Мне вздумается, а не вот эти ваши СММ-алгоритмы. Поздравляю всех с наступившем Кита…
🔥23👍15❤9🤯2😁2
Собрал видео, о том как прошел премьерный показ нового «Шурика»! ⚡ ВСЕ В КИНО, поддержим наших!
🔥30❤17🏆6👎3
С сегодняшнего дня, стало возможным создать себе новогоднее настроение и похохотать на расслабоне посмотрев «Невероятные Приклбчения Шурика» ! Зачем ждать Новый год, когда настроение можно себе сделать за 500 рублей! Саша, собрал классный ролик, о том как это было вчера! А вчера был восторг! ❤️
❤19👍8
Очень странное дело — новогодний фильм ТНТ «НЕВЕРОЯТНЫЕ ПРИКЛЮЧЕНИЯ ШУРИКА» в кино показывают с 11 декабря 👀 @TNT_television
❤21🔥12🤯9
Всем, привет! Сегодня последняя смена, большого новогоднего проекта «Невероятные приключения Шурика». Возвращаюсь в онлайн! Накопил много заметок, буду делится ❤️
🔥30❤22👍13
Posted without readable text
🍾25
Книжные Итоги! Впервые делал нечто подобное! Думал будет проще выбрать, но оказалось много новых книг, каждую захотелось прочитать. Прям очень "в тему" многие, чувствуется наш миллениальный вайб)) Принцип выбора был такой. Я прочитал описание каждой книги, которую вы прислали в интернете и думал с мыслью, чтобы сейчас был готов купить и почитать исходя из описания. Получился список, который выложу следующим постом…
🏆16👍10⚡6❤3
По техническим причинам 😴, результаты будут завтра в 15:00! Кто не успел, у вас есть еще немного времени! 😅
❤3
Первые результаты! Ровно 5 комментариев! Как удобно) Спасибо, что не придется долго выбирать) Но если кто еще хочет получить годовую подписку на сервис для чтения и слушания книг - пишите книги, которые повлияли на вас или вы перечитывали несколько раз под постом выше 👆. Достаточно только названия для участия. Я ищу книгу для чтения, параллельно придумал вам подарок 🎁 Осталось 2 дня ⏰ P.s. Надеюсь, что не только …
👍7😁5🤔2
Бесплатное чтение (другой способ) Для всех кому хочется бесплатно читать книги, но не очень нравится предыдущий способ, есть вариант попроще - написать о своей любимой книге/книгах в комментариях и получить сертификат на MyBook. Просто, по-доброму, для своих, без всякой возни с репостами, участвуют все, даже не подписанные. Это не реклама, Я купил за свои деньги сертификат и решил подарить его кому-то из подписчико…
👍7🏆5❤4
Бесплатное чтение. За всеми этими рилсиками, шортсами, клиповым монтажом всего и вся, где кадры длятся не дольше 4 секунд, мы стали забывать про более приземленное и медитативное…долгое чтение (лонгриды в ТГ не в счет). Я остаюсь приверженцем смакования каждого художественного слова в произведении, особенно в книгах, особенно если это бестселлеры. Так вот. Оказывается в Литрес, есть не только покупка книг и подписк…
👍7❤5👌3🔥3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @semichevmisha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 302,358 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки Семичева” (@semichevmisha), 1,286 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/semichevmisha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.