Профессиональное сообщество коммерческих директоров ИТ-компаний. Обсуждаем кому и как продавать ИТ-решения, подходы к построению продаж и управлению командами в ИТ b2b enterprise.
Редакция: Надежда Левашова
Контакты: @Levashova_N
Created
Between 1 August 2025 and 3 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 16:01
166
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:37
166
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 166 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026
Posts held
20 (3 October 2025 – 14 July 2026)
Views total
51
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Videos
1
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
40
35.7%
❤
19
17.0%
✍
15
13.4%
👍
13
11.6%
👏
10
8.93%
⚡
3
2.68%
💯
3
2.68%
🤣
3
2.68%
🤝
2
1.79%
🫡
2
1.79%
🍾
1
0.893%
🙏
1
0.893%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Учреждена первая премия за достижения в B2B-маркетинге и PR ИТ-продуктов и услуг «Продвигай ИТ»
Сообщество «Продвигай ИТ», объединяющее более 4500 экспертов в области B2B-продвижения, директоров по маркетингу и PR российских ИТ-компаний, объявляет о старте первой отраслевой премии, призванной выявить и наградить лучшие проекты, руководителей и команды, отвечающие за продвижение в ИТ-компаниях.
Сайт премии >
Премия…
⚡Коммерческим директором MWS стал выходец из Dell, IBM, SAP и Oracle
МТС Web Services (MWS) объявил о назначении Олега Порецкого коммерческим директором ИТ-холдинга. В новой роли Олег сосредоточится на масштабировании продаж собственных продуктов компании, развитии единой коммерческой модели MWS и координации продуктовых направлений холдинга, а также обеспечении устойчивого роста выручки MWS, говорится в сообщении к…
Чего ИТ-бизнесу ждать от 2026-2027 годов в продажах и маркетинге? Напоминаем о предстоящем вебинаре Продвигай ИТ.
Дата: 16 июня 2026
Время: 16:00 МСК
Спикеры вебинара:
⚡Шамиль Муртазалиев, директор по операционной эффективности Cloud.ru
⚡Дмитрий Биге, экс-коммерческий директор системного интегратора «АйТи», экс-IBM
⚡Дария Беседа, директор по маркетингу «Базальт СПО»
⚡Владимир Левин, управляющий партнер Artimate
⚡А…
Продавай ИТ pinned «🩸«Кровавый» 2025-й позади. Чего ИТ-бизнесу ждать от 2026-2027 годов в продажах и маркетинге? «На нашем рынке реально льётся кровь», - говорил в декабре 2025 г. гендиректор группы «Астра» Илья Сивцев, рассказывая о замедлении продаж и снижении ИТ-бюджетов…»
🩸«Кровавый» 2025-й позади. Чего ИТ-бизнесу ждать от 2026-2027 годов в продажах и маркетинге?
«На нашем рынке реально льётся кровь», - говорил в декабре 2025 г. гендиректор группы «Астра» Илья Сивцев, рассказывая о замедлении продаж и снижении ИТ-бюджетов заказчиков.
Основная причина замедления – высокая ключевая ставка. Это, по словам Сивцева, отразилось на бюджетах заказчиков, многие стали сдвигать инвестиционные …
Сразу в трех российских ИТ-компаниях объявили о назначении новых коммерческих директоров 12 мая. И мы подумали, что это тот самый день, когда пора возобновить вещание этого канала.
👉Итак, о назначениях:
Коммерческим директором «Базальт СПО» стал Владислав Животягин. Он сменил Евгению Крынину, которая продолжит работу в должностях заместителя коммерческого директора и начальника отдела продаж. Ранее Животягин работа…
Запись вебинара "Кейсы. Как их собрать? Сколько они стоят? Как убедить продажи и ЛПР в их необходимости"?
Делимся записью вебинара с участием:
Андрея Данкевича, руководителя продуктового маркетинга Positive Technologies NGFW (ранее Лаборатория Касперского, Solar Security, Check Point, Infowatch).
и
Алексея Кирпикова, коммерческого директора ITFB Group, экс-IBS/Luxoft, SAP.
Что обсудили?
❓Почему кейсы нужны всем?
С…
⚡️ ЦБ РФ понизил ключевую ставку до 16,5% годовых. Новость важная для продаж длинных проектов, если в финансовую модель вы закладываете стоимость денег. Закладываете же, надеюсь?😊
Вебинар о кейсах начинается через 15 минут
Вебинар Продвигай ИТ "Кейсы. Как их собрать? Сколько они стоят? Как убедить продажи и ЛПР в их необходимости"?
пройдет сегодня в 12:00 МСК на платформе МТС Линк.
⚡️Что обсудим?
❓ Почему кейсы нужны всем?
❓ Сколько стоит хороший кейс? Нужно ли платить продавцам?
❓ Как убедить клиента поделиться историей успеха? И можно ли что-то сделать, если клиент не вполне доволен резул…
Платят ли в вашей компании продавцам за принесенный клиентский кейс?
Да 💵8%
Нет62%
Кейсов было бы намного больше, если за них платили 😄30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @selling_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Платят ли в вашей компании продавцам за принесенный клиентский кейс?
Да 💵8%
Нет62%
Кейсов было бы намного больше, если за них платили 😄30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2025 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 614,643 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продавай ИТ” (@selling_it), 166 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selling_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
