Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

selliara

@sell847

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

554subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001993722752
TypeChannel
Username@sell847
Descriptionhttps://t.me/boost/sell847
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sell847

Growth

5546 Aug 2026, 22:48 — 554 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:01 — 554 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:486 Aug 2026, 23:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 553–555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:01554no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:48554first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 554 subscribers
Avg views / post
205
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
36.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held7 (17 May 202627 July 2026)
Views total410
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
399
Videos
3
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

636 reactions across 7 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52539837016409691747912.4%
custom 5372834195569653966457.08%
custom 5348511173002162061446.92%
custom 5188622227905462986436.76%
custom 5915822335000058455416.45%
custom 5215170593288119138406.29%
custom 5389118581252314641365.66%
custom 5242395678012896758355.50%
custom 5377804632372299989264.09%
custom 5193095779941643375253.93%
custom 5330439784571619501243.77%
custom 5188449879457808556233.62%
custom 5456460700631193226223.46%
🦄213.30%
💘203.14%
custom 5359544510193889173182.83%
custom 5291971158365724840152.36%
custom 5381932731598938352152.36%
custom 5465370906639492368121.89%
custom 5330320358710989333111.73%
14 further kinds416.45%

Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 636reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 7 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sell847. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC196 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я оч ценю ваши комменты но можете реакты мне тоже иногда ставить пж 😭😭 я дизморалюсь пиздец

custom 537283419556965396622custom 529197115836572484013custom 546537090663949236811

27 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC214 views102 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 | реквесты парт ван и тонидрЮРИ для контраста ну тут не грех поставить лосяру моим шедеврообработкам 👍🏻 можете еще писать кст

custom 518862222790546298643custom 519309577994164337525custom 537283419556965396623custom 51973392763495729106❤‍🔥2custom 52919711583657248402custom 54653709066394923681

9 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC444 views92 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вот такой вимси коммишн для @f4n74sm 💖 🤩

custom 534851117300216206144🦄21💘14custom 53483579199791041455custom 52894991985284396503👾2custom 53778046323722999892custom 53931711320042017601

1 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC647 views94 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

в честь лесбиюля беру реквесты на влв пары 🌟🌟картиночк (честно постараюсь отрисовать хоть чета) фем версии мейл пейров тоже считаются ай гес

custom 591582233500005845541custom 533043978457161950124custom 545646070063119322622custom 54358636566822547484custom 51930827533058364372💘1

13 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC681 views86 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️ ⚔️⚔️ когда твой муж ебака демон но ты добрый гражданин крестьянин и решаешь его закопать а перед этим устроить нежный пикник на кладбище как говорится я и кто 🌫️ полгода не рисовала на графическом планшете оказывается я даже полноценки могу делать и да это снова тонидрюшки

custom 521517059328811913840custom 518844987945780855623custom 535954451019388917318custom 54654803252263181372💘1custom 53796629573471034051custom 54358636566822547481

7 Jun 2026, 14:27 UTC700 views70 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

наскребла контентик очень вовремя я вернулась в идв фд конечно остальное это осы (лор однажды будет) гориллз деточки и поупвит (больница питт)

custom 524239567801289675835custom 538193273159893835215custom 533032035871098933311custom 53078495279049805224custom 53278110970827439503💘1custom 53055114593781873821

17 May 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,460 views146 reactions23 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

mwah

custom 525398370164096917479custom 538911858125231464136custom 537780463237229998924custom 53437135914533150344💘3

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sell847. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,758 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“selliara” (@sell847), 554 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sell847.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.