Channel
@selfishstory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001547883461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @selfishstory |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/selfishstory |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 173 | -2 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 175 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 174 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 175 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 174 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 173 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 173 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
231 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5224234301427569044 | 50 | 21.6% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5193003154676948658 | 20 | 8.66% | |
| custom 5319224276342055606 | 18 | 7.79% | |
| custom 5222118020716978706 | 17 | 7.36% | |
| custom 5222273021791715113 | 16 | 6.93% | |
| custom 5287228075656898683 | 15 | 6.49% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 6.49% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 6.49% | |
| custom 5231179310789857819 | 13 | 5.63% | |
| custom 5256253694936129912 | 8 | 3.46% | |
| custom 5274011954480975713 | 7 | 3.03% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍁🤍 спокойные будни последний месяц лета ощущается как долгожданная передышка: отключила будильники и перестала выписывать дела на день, следую внутреннему расписанию и нахожу в себе больше сил чем когда-либо прежде
❤11custom 52872280756568986839🥰6🔥4custom 52222730217917151132
🫧☕️🌫️🌟 2 недели без скроллинга устроила для себя челлендж на месяц: полный отказ от коротких видео с каждым днем ощущаю, что в голове становится все тише, а на смену огромному потоку мыслей приходит пустота и тревога (учусь находиться с ней, не убегать, не пытаться заглушить) 📰🖤 // впереди еще 2 недели, посмотрим, к чему меня это приведёт
custom 519300315467694865812custom 52222730217917151137custom 52872280756568986836❤2🔥1🥰1
🌟⭐️ и сколько не пытается сознание в пыль обернуть страдания миг наступает – пелена вокруг от боли в сердце просыпаешься вдруг все это временно, подруга ожоги охладит вода печаль дождем омоет, и тогда рана зацветет и отступит тоска все в жизни временно, поверь и это тоже обязательно пройдет среди туч блестнет радуга солнце снова взойдет 🔮🔥 // чем сильнее шторм, тем ярче радуга после
custom 522423430142756904411custom 51930031546769486588custom 52222730217917151137
🧺🌫️ книжный пикник рецепт приятного летнего выходного: покрывало, книги, свежие фрукты и прохладные лимонады и, конечно же, люди, готовые разделить с тобой этот теплый вечер 🍋 // пришли бы на такую встречу?
custom 522423430142756904417custom 531922427634205560610custom 52221180207169787069❤2🔥1🥰1
🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🌛🌟🌟🌟 чему же, собственно, ты хотел научиться от учителей и из их учений, и чему именно, сколько тебя не учили, они все-таки не сумели научить тебя? сиддхартха герман гессе 🪷🪷🌟 я хотела научиться быть собой
custom 522423430142756904411custom 52221180207169787066custom 53192242763420556066❤4🥰3🔥1
🤩 🤩👌сиддхартха — моя любимая книга настолько путь героя, его мысли, искания, сомнения совпадают с тем, что у меня внутри [теперь содержание книги является частью меня, моего опыта, моей души] ✨☕️ // на этой встрече книжного клуба собрались мои единомышленники, те, кто смотрит на мир похоже, кто чувствует его также... и это так приятно, когда твоих глубоких мыслей не боятся, а разделяют
❤14custom 522423430142756904411🔥6🥰3custom 52221180207169787062custom 53192242763420556062
🤩🤩мы можем выбирать как воспринимать событие ходили на прогулку в дурацкий лес, в котором были уже сотни раз или устроили настоящий мини поход: собрали рюкзаки, взяли покрывало, булочки в пекарне и через лес дошли до карьера, пили воду из родника, а потом лежали на траве, смотря на проплывающие облака 🤩🍃// один и тот же лес, но разными глазами
custom 523117931078985781913custom 52562536949361299128custom 52740119544809757137❤4🔥2🥰1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @selfishstory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лиза | когда-нибудь в кино” (@selfishstory), 173 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selfishstory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.