Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 993–1,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:01
995
+1
10 Sept 2026, 10:41
994
-1
2 Sept 2026, 05:45
995
+1
25 Aug 2026, 19:22
994
-2
18 Aug 2026, 07:22
996
-3
10 Aug 2026, 11:08
999
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:34
1,000
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:41
1,000
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
42
39.3%
❤
32
29.9%
👍
19
17.8%
👏
6
5.61%
💯
6
5.61%
😁
2
1.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎙 Подкаст состоялся!
Спасибо всем, кто был с нами в эфире!
Вместе с Олесей Мельник мы подробно разобрали, как сегодня зарабатывать на недвижимости Юга России.
В ходе разговора Олеся поделилась своим опытом работы с брокерами и риелторами, рассказала, как выстроена работа команды, как проходит взаимодействие с застройщиками, почему важно делать качественные просчеты объектов и как этот подход помогает уверенно рабо…
Почему одни брокеры закрывают сделки легко, а другие месяцами ждут клиентов?
За годы работы коучем я понял одну важную вещь.
Большинство людей упираются не в отсутствие возможностей.
Они упираются в собственное мышление.
Страх отказа.
Страх поднять чек.
Неуверенность в себе.
Ожидание идеального момента.
Именно это чаще всего мешает выйти на новый уровень дохода.
В этот понедельник мы с инвест-брокером Олесей Мельни…
В запрещенной это видео привлекло много внимания, так что считаю важным и с вами поделиться.
Сначала посмотрите видео, а потом можете свериться с собой по пунктам.
Люди этого типа личности:
❗️часто сравнивают себя с другими и чувствуют себя хорошо, только если сравнение в их пользу (однако чаще бывает наоборот)
❗️ощущают в себе огромный потенциал, но почему-то никак не могут начать (или достаточно долго продолжать)…
Всем привет! 👋🏻
Планирую провести подкаст с экспертом по брокерству, у которого сейчас более 20 инвестиционных объектов вработе.
Поговорим о том, как правильно считать доходность и преподносить её инвесторам, как проводить консультациии вести соцсети.
Как вам такое? Ставьте огонь 🔥 в реакциях и пишите «+» в комментариях, чтобы я понял, что вы ещё здесь. 😁
Это видео я пересмотрела уже миллион раз 🥹
Миша случайно нажал на запись аудио в чате с другом, и так получилось зафиксировать наши настоящие отношения
Вы спрашивали - отвечаю: запись вебинара будет 🥳
(Точнее, уже есть)
Если вы не смогли участвовать сегодня, напишите мне в личные сообщения, и я пришлю вам ссылку.
🤫 По секрету скажу, что ближайшую неделю для всех посмотревших действует крутой бонус!
Я такого ещё не делала 😉
П.с. Так выглядит закулисье и нижняя часть ведущей вебинара 😂
Доброе утро всем кто ещё здесь))
Поставьте пожалуйста + в комментариях кто сегодня будет на эфире в 14:00 ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @seleznevspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 29 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Михаил Селезнёв” (@seleznevspace), 995 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seleznevspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.