Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дигибрид

Channel

Дигибрид

@selevgenius

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001112311713
TypeChannel
Username@selevgenius
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/selevgenius

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6268657 August 2026 — 67 subscribers10 August 2026 — 67 subscribers8 September 2026 — 68 subscribers15 September 2026 — 65 subscribers29 September 2026 — 64 subscribers9 October 2026 — 62 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 63 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 23:4162-2
29 Sept 2026, 05:0264-1
15 Sept 2026, 10:3865-3
8 Sept 2026, 03:5968+1
10 Aug 2026, 01:0267no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:4367first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2619.4%
❤‍🔥139.70%
🌭96.72%
🗿85.97%
🔥75.22%
🙈64.48%
🦄64.48%
💔53.73%
🤔53.73%
⚡42.99%
🍾42.99%
👍42.99%
💊42.99%
💩42.99%
😁42.99%
🌚32.24%
👏32.24%
💘32.24%
🙉32.24%
🙊32.24%
7 further kinds107.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @selevgenius. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC32 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Убаюканные воспоминания имеют свойство воспламенения - хоть рук и не обожгут, но память подпалят. Принято мумифицировать прошлое, заталкивая его в самый конкретный, простецкий угол. Но если дать волю мысли, ребята... Ловишь в сачок разлетевшихся по коридорам флегматичных шахматистов, анархистов и языковых профессоров. Они из номера в номер порхают, гундят, брюзжат, ноют и оборачиваются, теряя ключи. А ты - хоп! И дал…

🤔4👍3❤2

3 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC59 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Бабуля вяло елозит тележкой по рыхлой ноябрьской колее. Застревая в снежных ложбинках она беспрестанно кряхтит и охает, продолжая свой путь. Наконец, добредя до светофора, она глухо выдыхает. Подняв уставшие глаза в ленинградское небо, махровой варежкой стирает морось с лица. Запускает другую руку в карман фуфайки, проверяя наличие ключей. Неожиданно для себя, нащупав что-то знакомое внутри, она улыбается.

❤6👏3❤‍🔥2🌭1

31 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC63 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Иной раз ныряешь в сумрачную тьму придорожных кустов. Наугад, как в акацию - авось обойдется! А потом стоишь, шатаясь слюнявым флюгером, бесконечно нарезая огурец по памяти. Казалось бы: вот попка, колечко, колечко, ещё колечко ну и...где пёстрый желтушный гогеновский кончик? Весь пульсируешь, зыркаешь зазря туда-сюда в этой сухупутной качке между кизилом и шелковицей, подняв ахавское копьё. Но постой, вот же, совсем…

☃2❤2❤‍🔥2🔥2🌭1🍌1💔1🦄1

25 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC103 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

"Простенькая программа. Интерфейс - строчка кода с условиями из разряда "if". Кстати, так думаю и назову, лаконично. С помощью этого алгоритма переписывается вся прошлая и дальнейшая история. Ага, весьма иронично. Визуальная новелла, но без лишний удобрений. Чистая фантазия на тему. Ты понимаешь? Как бы объяснить... Допустим формируешь запрос на удаление негров или скажем - сострадания ближнему. В чём минусы? Резонно…

🙈4🙉3🙊3❤‍🔥2

13 Jul 2026, 22:33 UTC100 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Надеюсь в этом форде не будет назойливых попутчиков ❤️‍🩹

💔4🌭2🗿2

25 Jun 2026, 08:48 UTC143 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Юра, а вы ещё не всё проебали!

🔥2❤‍🔥1🌚1🍾1🤮1

6 Jun 2026, 23:46 UTC203 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Хотел написать о том, что литература это всегда выбор между содержанием и формой, изяществом и силой, искусством и вандализмом, сложно-тонкой Машей и приятно-тухлой Катей, о природе и фальши, методоксиле и мелатонине, пустоте и цельности, а всё опять пришло к писькам!

⚡3❤‍🔥1🌭1💩1

20 May 2026, 12:15 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @IzgoyProstorVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🌚2❤‍🔥1

20 May 2026, 12:15 UTC146 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мы стояли на тротуаре. Поблизости майский ветер качал ещё не раскрывшиеся одуванчики. Вытянувшись, они как будто подслушивали наш разговор: - Нет, ну почему они все меня бросают? Что я делаю не так?! - Это свойство человеческой натуры... - Да иди ты нахуй со своей философией! - Ребята, ну что вы попусту заряд тратите. Так и останетесь тут стоять. - А может я хочу разрядиться! Всяко лучше чем снова где-то валяться, бр…

⚡1❤‍🔥1🌭1

9 May 2026, 20:49 UTC148 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Коля, ты же на эти ступни ссылался, говоря о картине Джованни Беллини? Признавайся, шалунишка! Тот самый уязвленный баланс требует тонкой поддержки и вот мы уже бьёмся об лёд северного берега Обводного канала.

❤2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @selevgenius. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дигибрид” (@selevgenius), 62 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selevgenius.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.