4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:49
125
+24
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
101
no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:29
101
+96
7 Aug 2026, 13:40
5
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
171.0%
avg views ÷ 125 subscribers
Avg views / post
214
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.255%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
8 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
1,496
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2
66.7%
❤
1
33.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎬 هلسینگ: آلتیمیت (Hellsing Ultimate)
🩸 وقتی یک خونآشام افسانهای، آخرین امید انسانها در برابر ارتشی از هیولاها میشود...
اگر عاشق انیمههای اکشن، ترسناک و فانتزی تاریک هستی، Hellsing Ultimate یکی از بهترین انتخابهاست. داستان درباره سازمان هلسینگ به رهبری «اینتگرا» است که وظیفه مقابله با موجودات ماورایی را بر عهده دارد. سلاح اصلی این سازمان «آلوکارد»، خونآشامی فوقالعاده قدرتمند است که در کنار «سراس ویکتوریا» …
🎬 هلسینگ (Hellsing)
🩸 وقتی قدرتمندترین هیولا، سلاحی برای نابودی هیولاهای دیگر میشود...
اگر عاشق انیمههای اکشن، خونآشامی، ترسناک و فانتزی تاریک هستی، Hellsing یکی از آثار ماندگار این سبک است. داستان درباره سازمان «هلسینگ» است که وظیفه مقابله با موجودات ماورایی را بر عهده دارد و قدرتمندترین سلاحش، خونآشامی به نام «آلوکارد» است؛ موجودی که برای نابودی دشمنان سازمان وارد میدان میشود.
✨ ویژگیهای این انیمه:
🩸 خون…
🎬 کلیمور (Claymore)
⚔️ در دنیایی که هیولاها میان انسانها زندگی میکنند، تنها امید بشر جنگجویانی نیمهانسان هستند...
اگر عاشق انیمههای فانتزی تاریک، اکشن و مبارزات خشن هستی، Claymore انتخابی فوقالعاده است. داستان درباره «کلیر» است؛ یکی از جنگجویان کلیمور که برای نابودی هیولاهایی به نام «یوما» میجنگد و در مسیر خود به دنبال انتقام مرگ ترزا، جنگجوی قدرتمند گذشته، است.
✨ ویژگیهای این انیمه:
⚔️ مبارزات حماسی و هیجا…
🎬 عشق در کنار بیماری چونیبیو (Chuunibyou demo Koi ga Shitai!)
🌙 وقتی گذشته خجالتآور دوباره وارد زندگی میشود...
اگر عاشق انیمههای عاشقانه، کمدی و مدرسهای هستی، این اثر یکی از دوستداشتنیترین انتخابهاست. داستان درباره «یوتا توگاشی» است؛ پسری که میخواهد دوران خیالی و عجیب گذشتهاش را فراموش کند، اما با «ریکا تاکاناشی» دختری با باورهای فانتزی و قدرتهای خیالی آشنا میشود و زندگی آرامش تغییر میکند.
✨ ویژگیهای ا…
🎬 (Seishun Buta Yarou wa Bunny Girl Senpai no Yume wo Minai)
🌸 وقتی یک دختر مرموز دیگر توسط هیچکس دیده نمیشود...
اگر عاشق انیمههای عاشقانه، مدرسهای، درام و داستانهای رازآلود با چاشنی ماورایی هستی، این انیمه یکی از بهترین انتخابهاست. داستان درباره «ساکوتا آزوساگاوا» است؛ دانشآموز دبیرستانیای که روزی در کتابخانه با «مای ساکوراجیما»، بازیگر مشهور و محبوب مدرسه، روبهرو میشود؛ دختری که لباس خرگوشی پوشیده، اما ع…
🎬 اورلرد (Overlord)
👑 وقتی پایان یک بازی، آغاز حکومت یک پادشاه میشود...
اگر عاشق انیمههای ایسکای، فانتزی تاریک و شخصیتهای بیش از حد قدرتمند هستی، Overlord یکی از بهترین انتخابهاست. داستان درباره «مومونگا» است؛ آخرین بازیکنی که پس از خاموش شدن سرورهای بازی، به دنیایی ناشناخته منتقل میشود و در قالب پادشاه جادوگر آینز اول گون ماجراجویی خود را آغاز میکند.
✨ ویژگیهای این انیمه:
⚔️ داستان جذاب و متفاوت
💀 شخصیت اصل…
🎮 No Game No Life
♟ در دنیایی که همهچیز با بازی تعیین میشود، فقط نابغهها شانس پیروزی دارند!
«سورا» و «شیرو» دو خواهر و برادر نابغه هستند که در دنیای بازیهای آنلاین هیچوقت شکست نخوردهاند. یک روز، خدای بازیها آنها را به دنیایی به نام دیسبورد احضار میکند؛ جایی که جنگ، سیاست، پادشاهی و حتی سرنوشت انسانها فقط با انجام بازیها مشخص میشود. حالا آنها باید با هوش و استراتژی، دنیا را به چالش بکشند.
✨ چرا باید ببی…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sekaianimeir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 341,075 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سکای انیمه” (@sekaianimeir), 125 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sekaianimeir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
