Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

另一角度看世界👁

@seethe_world

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002287691974
TypeChannel
Username@seethe_world
Description解读社会现象、关注人的情感与尊严,偏心理/人文分析,冷静理性,适合喜欢柴静式“从个体看社会”的人。 Telegram最全RSS自动推送,一键订阅全网热点: @TGRSS
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/seethe_world

Growth

585958.56 August 2026 — 58 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:3159no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:2559+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:5258first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.6%
avg views ÷ 59 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.4
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total187
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
166
Links
165

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 皇冠... 📢VIP资源 📢代推🫥 📢开云体育 亚博体育 NB... 📢私密视频合集 📢AG直营-BG真人视讯-... 📢腾龙赌场|菲律宾马尼拉赌... 📢🏮TGMAX|一站式增... 📢瑞森老哥Reason|人... 📢🇹🇭泰国曼谷/芭提雅... 📢动漫|讲解|新番 📢极品嫩模 秀人网 📢墨镜先生 📢合肥全区中高端 📢【盛世数据】国内外数据源... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢专业Telegram账号交易平台🔥热门社交媒体账号交易 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢 全网最全面、最便宜的自助引流服务 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员,即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光,实现订阅快速增长。

10 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤️欢迎来到 TGRSS —— Telegram 上最智能、最全能的 RSS 自动内容矩阵! 在这里,你不需要手动刷新网页、不需要下载 App、不需要错过任何热点。 TGRSS 通过实时 RSS 订阅 + 自动化推送,为你打造了一个“内容永不缺席”的私人信息流: 实时全球新闻:科技、财经、国际大事,一秒不落 成人专区(18+):精选故事、幽默、亲密建议与行业动态(纯链接推送,安全隐私优先) [❤️‍🔥赞助商]TGFOX矩阵机器人 👩🏻‍⚕️广告投放: @TGRSS123 🚀支持200+频道同时投放,所有频道每天推送一次

6 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

【自我同一性系列】为什么独处反而让人精疲力竭?怎样走出强迫性思考?真正折磨你的,是那个无法逃离的内在客体|精神分析|依恋关系|Fonagy| 大家好,我是Anthony,欢迎来到我的频道,今天我们继续来聊一聊扩散逃避风格,尤其是想和大家聊一聊独处与强迫性的思考。 —————————————————— 您可以采用以下方式支持我的频道: 1.接受付费的语音咨询,预约请发邮件至【FreeHarbor2022@gmail.com】 2.点击视频下方的“感谢”或“thanks”的按钮打赏,也可以通过revolut, visa和master卡支付(可联系我的邮箱) 3.加入基础会员可查看文字稿,会员链接:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxN_H2tFQD-0B4d9wGdAVuA/join Anthony看世界 | youtube​.com • Aug 6, 2026

3 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

29 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

【自我同一性系列】扩散逃避风格:为什么最激烈反抗父母的孩子,往往最难走出家庭?如何判断人生是否陷入停滞?|Berzonsky |心理学|自我决定论|扩散逃避风格| 大家好,我是Anthony,欢迎来到我的频道。今天我们继续聊聊自我同一性的话题,也就是扩散逃避风格,diffuse avoidant style。这个系列的视频都会在标题开头加上一个标签,但相信有朋友能感觉到,我们频道许多的视频,其实也仍然是在围绕着自我同一性的发展这个话题来谈的。 —————————————————— 您可以采用以下方式支持我的频道: 1.接受付费的语音咨询,预约请发邮件至【FreeHarbor2022@gmail.com】 2.点击视频下方的“感谢”或“thanks”的按钮打赏,也可以通过revolut, visa和master卡支付(可联系我的邮箱) 3.加入基础会员可查看文字稿,会员链接:https://www.youtube.com/cha

27 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

21 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC48 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

中国文二代的翻车:贾浅浅为什么如此抽象?解读贾浅浅的病态父女关系|心理学|精神分析|文学|艺术| 大家好,我是Anthony,欢迎来到我的频道。咱们频道很少谈论文学话题,最近也是和一位热爱文学的朋友聊天,所以想和大家谈一个这两天中国文学圈的热点新闻,就是两位作家的翻车,蒋方舟和贾浅浅。那这期视频,我并不打算去挖掘她是如何抄袭的,因为这个话题在网上已经有大量讨论了。我们这个频道不是时事热点频道,我更想做的是挖掘一下贾浅浅和她的父亲贾平凹之间那种畸形的父女关系,以及她们自身的心理状态和精神世界。 —————————————————— 您可以采用以下方式支持我的频道: 1.接受付费的语音咨询,预约请发邮件至【FreeHarbor2022@gmail.com】 2.点击视频下方的“感谢”或“thanks”的按钮打赏,也可以通过revolut, visa和master卡支付(可联系我的邮箱) 3.加入基础会员可查看文字稿,会员链接:ht

20 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

14 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC60 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

【自我同一性系列】专业会过时,但只有一样东西永远不会贬值|在经济下行的时代,如何成为跳出统计规律的人?|同一性资本|心理学|哲学|中国社会| 大家好,我是Anthony,欢迎回到我的频道。今天我们继续来聊聊Côté的同一性资本理论。我们说了,这个理论在我成长过程中深刻地启发了我,所以值得我们多聊一聊。在上期视频,我们说中国社会有一种很常见的思维,就是说穷人就应该放弃自己的个性和理想,优先保证生存,任何对这种思维的反驳,都很容易被说成是高高在上和脱离现实。这种想法的确非常符合某种朴素的直觉,我们很容易能感到一个人放弃了自己的内在和个性,优先选择最能赚钱的行业,的确可以换来一种短期优势,比如说,如果你不那么讲自尊和个性,你的确能容忍更多工作和更多类型的人。然而我们通过对同一性资本的解释,指出对于一个普通人而言,最经济和最现实的做法,恰恰是坚持自己的个性和挖掘自己的内在。 —————————————————— 您可以采用以下方式支持

13 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC45 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

10 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

【自我同一性系列】为什么穷人才更应该坚持理想?张雪峰对普通人最大的误导是什么?坚持投资这件事的人都会收获回报|同一性资本|心理学|哲学|教育| 大家好,我是Anthony,欢迎回到我的频道,今天我们继续来聊聊自我同一性的话题,而且我会介绍一个新的理论,也就是社会学家James E. Côté的同一性资本理论,identity capital。值得一说的是,这个理论在我的成长过程中是起到了重大作用的,我第一次读到这个理论大概是在十九岁的时候,那时候我还有很多迷茫感,但也有很多模糊的直觉,而这个理论很精确地把我的那些直觉清晰地总结和论证出来了,当时就感到非常有共鸣,所以这期视频在咱们的频道里会成为核心内容之一。我会把这期视频放在《心理与教育》这个列表内,如果你有任何想找我探讨和咨询的话题,都可以联系我的邮箱预约。 —————————————————— 您可以采用以下方式支持我的频道: 1.接受付费的语音咨询,预约请发邮件至【Fre

6 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seethe_world. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,343 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“另一角度看世界👁” (@seethe_world), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seethe_world.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.