Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Seelen-Heil-Berlin

Channel

Seelen-Heil-Berlin

@seelen_heil_berlin13

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

491subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300745051
TypeChannel
Username@seelen_heil_berlin13
Created27 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seelen_heil_berlin13

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

491496493.56 August 2026 — 496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 496 subscribers13 August 2026 — 493 subscribers19 August 2026 — 494 subscribers27 August 2026 — 492 subscribers4 September 2026 — 493 subscribers12 September 2026 — 491 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 490–497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 18:41491-2
4 Sept 2026, 00:41493+1
27 Aug 2026, 08:25492-2
19 Aug 2026, 07:32494+1
13 Aug 2026, 00:18493-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:46496no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:02496first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13761.4%
🔥229.87%
👍208.97%
❤‍🔥104.48%
🥰73.14%
💯62.69%
👏52.24%
🕊52.24%
🙏41.79%
🤔31.35%
😢20.897%
🤝20.897%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 26 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2026, 16:04 UTC505 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahnen_Ursprung

🤍 🩶 🖤 Das bedeutet nicht Konflikt um des Konflikts willen. Es bedeutet die Bereitschaft, eine Verletzung zu riskieren, um die Möglichkeit von Reparatur zu haben. Denn in der Reparatur entsteht Vertrauen. Wenn du sagst: „Das hat mich verletzt“, und der andere sagt: „Ich höre dich“, verschiebt sich etwas. Wenn du wütend bist und er nicht geht, lernt dein Körper: Vielleicht ist es hier sicher, echt zu sein. Jede Rep

7👍4🔥4👏2🤝1

26 Jan 2026, 15:59 UTC379 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahnen_UrsprungPhoto

🤍 🩶 🖤 Intimität kostet etwas. Sie verlangt, dass du jemanden dich sehen lässt. Wirklich sehen. Die Teile, die zusammenzucken. Die Teile, die sich verteidigen. Die Stellen, an denen du noch roh bist von etwas, das vor Jahren passiert ist. Und wenn du jemanden so nah an dich heranlässt, wird er unweigerlich auf etwas Zartes treten. Er wird das Falsche sagen. Dich missverstehen. Vergessen, was wichtig ist. Dich verle

6🔥4🥰2👏1

26 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC282 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Beziehung (Liebe) triggert das Thema Nähe, das löst tief verborgene Ängste aus. Wenn Bindung in der Kindheit nicht verlässlich war oder gar nicht stattgefunden hat, bildet die Psyche ein Schutzprogramm. Das bleibt zeitlebens, wenn es nicht am (Ur) Grund geheilt wird. Dann werden Beziehungen/Partnerschaften eher auf Funktion geführt, als auf Herzensverbindung.

💯4🔥3

22 Jan 2026, 16:14 UTC347 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahnen_UrsprungVideo

🤍 🤍 🤍 Beziehung ist der Spiegel, in dem wir uns selbst sehen, wie wir sind. Bedingungslos oder egozentrisch? Dienend oder konsumierend? Quellbewußtsein oder Mangelbewußtsein? Die Frage, die man sich stellen sollte lautet, auf welchen Ebenen besteht die Verbindung zwischen zwei Menschen. ❣Je mehr ein Mensch die oberen Chakren oder die oberen Zentren entwickelt hat und darüber auch mit einem anderen Menschen verb

3👍2🥰2❤‍🔥1

10 Jan 2026, 08:46 UTC477 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11🔥2🥰1

10 Jan 2026, 08:46 UTC484 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Verwechsle Lieben nicht dem dir bekannten Verliebtsein.... Oft erkennst du die Liebe nicht, da du dich immer noch an der Vorstellung und Erfahrung des Verliebtseins festhältst, alles davon abhängig machst und es in einen Topf mit der Liebe wirfst. Doch wirklich Lieben hat so gar nichts mit Oberflächlichkeit, Abhängigkeit, Euphorie, rosaroter Brille usw. zu tun. Liebe, lieben ist ruhig, tief, innere Wärme, voller K

13👍3🔥3🥰2

21 Dec 2025, 15:08 UTC479 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRj60M3DU6H/?igsh=MjRsOTd0a2luampv

3👍2🤔2

Signed Ivančica

9 Dec 2025, 23:33 UTC578 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

4🙏3🕊2👍1🤔1😢1

Signed Ivančica

30 Nov 2025, 11:03 UTC635 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3

Signed Ivančica

30 Nov 2025, 10:56 UTC609 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahnen_UrsprungVideo

🤍 🩶 🖤 Die Wahrheit über Begehren und sexuelle Anziehung Teil 4 Die Anziehung als Spiegel der Seele Karl Jung sagte: ,,Alles, was uns am anderen irritiert, kann uns zu einem besseren Verständnis unserer Selbst führen." Diese Einsicht gilt in noch größerem Maße für die Anziehung, denn das, was uns magnetisch zu einem Menschen hinzieht, ist oft weniger über ihn als über uns selbst. Die sexuelle und emotionale Anzie

3👍3👏2

Signed Ivančica

29 Nov 2025, 20:24 UTC427 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5

Signed Ivančica

29 Nov 2025, 20:23 UTC442 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Das Tor zum goldenen Zeitalter Wenn du die Welt verändern möchtest, liebe einen Mann. Liebe ihn aufrichtig. Wähle den einen, dessen Seele klar die deine ruft, der dich sieht und mutig genug ist, ängstlich zu sein. Empfange seine Hand und führe ihn sanft zu deines Herzens Blut, dass er deine Wärme auf sich spüren kann und Ruhe findet, dass seine schwere Last verbrennen kann in deinem Feuer. Schau in seine Augen, sc

13❤‍🔥1👍1🔥1😢1

Signed Ivančica

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seelen_heil_berlin13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seelen-Heil-Berlin” (@seelen_heil_berlin13), 491 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seelen_heil_berlin13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.