Posted without readable text
👍3

Channel
@seeking_x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,841subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001923318180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seeking_x |
| Description | Ищу иксы и инсайды для вас, друзья! Всё бесплатно и открыто! По рекламе @evasaturnia Приглашайте друзей: https://t.me/+cpLu4VrpHH41YzEy РКН: https://clck.ru/3N47kY |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seeking_x |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 11,841 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 11,849 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 11,859 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 11,862 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 11,869 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 11,870 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 11,881 | -14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 11,895 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 11,899 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 11,906 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:20 | 11,912 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 11,916 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:09 | 11,923 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 11,928 | first reading |
86 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 79 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 86 (3 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,610 |
| Reactions total | 536 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
536 reactions across 79 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 131 | 24.4% | |
| 🤝 | 100 | 18.7% | |
| 🔥 | 75 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 74 | 13.8% | |
| 👏 | 61 | 11.4% | |
| 💯 | 57 | 10.6% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 3.54% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 1.12% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 1.12% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.187% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
👍3
🐻 Паттерн «Медвежий захват за пояс» (Bearish Belt Hold) «Медвежий захват за пояс» – это односвечный разворотный паттерн, который появляется на вершине восходящего тренда. Модель показывает момент, когда продавцы резко перехватывают инициативу после роста. 🥋 Анатомия Захвата: как распознать силовой импульс • Отсутствие верхней тени: свеча открывается на самом пике или очень близко к нему. Верхнего хвоста практическ…
❤3👏2🔥2😁1
Posted without readable text
Рубрика "Вопрос-ответ"🤝🤝🤝 Жду ваши вопросы по активам📊 ➖Тикер. ➖Направление движения. ➖Точка входа под интерес. Если вопросы не связаны с активами, попрошу тоже больше конкретики. В комментариях под публикацией жду до воскресенья ⏰ Давно не было, возобновим рубрику. 👉 Я в Телеграм | MAX
🔥3❤2🐳1🤝1
Posted without readable text
🤝2
Берём за ориентир эту отметку📈 🇷🇺#IRUS2 2130 пунктов на текущую/предстоящую неделю. Закроемся выше, потенциал порасти будет больше, ниже - скорее пойдем в коррекцию. Один из маркеров для рынка, также пробежимся по тяжеловесам, все равно пятница и заняться на рынке нечем. Неделя меня устраивает, много идей было и много реализацией🤝🤝🤝
🔥4❤2👏1
Posted without readable text
🤔1
Это самое важное на сегодня, с остальным разберемся позже, по фонде есть пару идей🤝
🔥4💯1🤝1
Признаю свою ошибку❌ Золото я закрыл, т.к движение уже выходит за рамки ожидаемого сценария. Убыток -3,5% по позиции, к депозиту -0,6%. Благо, это все балансируется хорошо отработанными Лонгами по акциям🤝 Работаем дальше, неудачи случаются, главное идти дальше. Больше идей в Trade Premium подписаться
🔥6❤2👍1👏1
Posted without readable text
👍1
Двоякая картина, в которой мы находимся по фонде⁉️ Пока для меня здесь сугубо боковик над уровнем 2130, где мы не можем выйти ни ниже, ни выше. 🗣Можно тут сказать о том, что сегодня день уже носит другой окрас, нежели вчера, но однозначно говорить о том, что рост захлебнулся - думаю нет. Пока и опорная точка отрабатывает, и по основным активам ничего кроме боковика и внутридневной волатильности. Завтра еще разберу…
👍5❤1
Когда мы уже будем спокойно идти без таких выкидонов?!🤷 🗣Песков: •Из-за позиции Киева предпосылок для оптимизма на треке мирного урегулирования на Украине сейчас нет. •Точных дат визита Уиткоффа и Кушнера в Россию пока нет. Потенциал идей из-за этого я не закрываю, такие проливы структуру не ломают, ровно то же самое и вчера наблюдали📈 В общем, разберемся🤝
🤝4❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @seeking_x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,051,222 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ищу иксы” (@seeking_x), 11,841 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seeking_x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.